24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2468  |  回复: 9

dewhjr

银虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 论文被拒~大家看看问题出在哪儿呢 已有8人参与

在投稿系统显示论文“Required Review Complete”一个月零一天后的今天收到了主编的拒稿邮件(曾在7月10号左右发过邮件给主编希望他能尽快的返回审稿意见)。邮件中主编说是根据审稿人意见作出的拒稿决定,但我看审稿人意见,除了英语需要修改外,其它没啥大问题,比如增加实验。但主编直接就拒了,还拒的很彻底。个人觉得他拒的很牵强,感觉应该给个修改后再审的机会。我把主编的邮件和审稿人的意见附在下面,大家看看问题出在哪儿了呢。

主编:
Thank you for submitting your manuscript for possible publication in ×××.

Following are the reviews for your paper referenced above.  Based on the reviews, I regret that I cannot accept or further consider it for publication in ×××.  

Thank you for your interest in ×××.
Sincerely,
Dr. ×××
Editor-in-Chief
×××

主编返回的审稿人意见:

Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #1: First, English should be improved, many errors and sentences are too long that lead to a misunderstand. This paper was presented a methud that its name is ×××. this methud Does not change much with the previous methud. But There is little innovation, Where used from two-dimensional ××× in conjunction with the ××× image denoising algorithm. Formula 7 in page 10, is not a new formula of estimators. This formula was used previously. Finally this paper With a small change can become a good article.
Sincerely,

Reviewer #3: In the paper, ××× is used for denoising images. ×××(对论文方法的描述). It is claimed that "The comparative experimental results for natural images and medical images show that the method introduced in the paper achieves better denoising performance, and that  the accuracy and computational cost of the ××× image denoising algorithm are all improved."
1. As far as I can see, the formulations used in the paper seem to be O.K.
2. But the language used in the paper needs to be highly corrected.  To show the locations of the linguistic mistakes, I attached a Word document in which the problematic  words and phrases are colored into yellow.  And probably there are more mistakes that I missed throughout the paper.
3. Instead of having a fixed 21x21 pixel search window, it would be interesting to see the effects of changing the window size.
4. In Table 1, as the author confessed, the method introduced in this paper does not outperform all other state-of-the art methods, but it still gives comparable performance results. Similar results are valid for Table 2.
5. It would be good to add the computation times of the method in Table 3 since it outperforms other denoising methods in PSNR every now and then.
6. Finally the last sentence in the "Abstract" should be corrected maybe by writing it as
"Finally, the comparative experimental results show that our method achieves better denoising performance in some  of the well known images and outperforms other methods in computational time in all images."

顺便提一句,审稿人2说他提供了一份指出我论文中语法错误之类的word文档,但主编咋个没有把这个文档返回给我呢...
回复此楼
从负开始。
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lele0131

金虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
应该给次修改的机会,充其量为大修,不妨申诉一下。祝愿好运!
无限风光在险峰!
2楼2011-07-20 18:56:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

永不放弃123

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
难道是楼主催稿的缘故吗?我只是猜测呵呵,楼主好好跟编辑沟通下,争取下吧,祝好运,同时也祈祷我的论文能有好的结果
3楼2011-07-20 19:43:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

永不放弃123

新虫 (正式写手)

难道是楼主催稿的缘故吗?我只是猜测呵呵,楼主好好跟编辑沟通下,争取下吧,祝好运,同时也祈祷我的论文能有好的结果
4楼2011-07-20 19:43:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liunahan

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
第一个认为 认为你的文章新意不足,第二个人如果确实有专门的word提出语法问题,可见问题之严重。严重的语法和写作问题影射数据问题,第三是否和催稿有关系不好说。

[ Last edited by liunahan on 2011-7-20 at 19:59 ]
生活终究多彩
5楼2011-07-20 19:58:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaocy8903

木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
There is little innovation
这个很致命。如果是 a little还好点
6楼2011-07-20 20:17:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

fansire

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
There is little innovation,意思就是说只有很少的(这在英语里是否定句啊楼主)创新点……这才是要命的!
7楼2011-07-20 20:28:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kingsong

银虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
估计申诉也够呛。
改改重投吧。
8楼2011-07-20 20:40:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

shiningboy

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by dewhjr at 2011-07-20 18:22:00:
在投稿系统显示论文“Required Review Complete”一个月零一天后的今天收到了主编的拒稿邮件(曾在7月10号左右发过邮件给主编希望他能尽快的返回审稿意见)。邮件中主编说是根据审稿人意见作出的拒稿决定,但我看 ...

猴急的后果,编辑掌握着生杀大权!
9楼2011-07-20 20:45:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

pcec

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
第一个reviewer 的意见很致命,创新性不足是直接reject的主要原因。
10楼2011-07-20 21:39:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 dewhjr 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 哪位高人中了,把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看,让我长长见识 +4 yuleib84 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 13:40 by yuleib84
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +4 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 13:12 by qingmu1201
[基金申请] 科研孤儿太难了 +21 我4大白菜 2026-08-20 22/1100 2026-08-26 11:29 by nlgza
[基金申请] 国合里面能看到了 +7 一怀馨秋 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-26 11:23 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战 +6 process2012 2026-08-23 8/400 2026-08-26 11:03 by zjlp
[基金申请] 项目信息和经费信息在系统里都可以看到了 +6 wittyboy 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-26 10:55 by wittyboy
[基金申请] 怎么看青基中了没有啊 +4 叶九微 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 10:52 by xiacongxu
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 牛来!米来!面来! +8 beefly 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-08-26 08:37 by xuzhipiao
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +24 木水思豆 2026-08-25 27/1350 2026-08-26 08:26 by yanchen918
[基金申请] 2026国自然函评费到账 +21 羊腰板 2026-08-21 24/1200 2026-08-26 07:20 by finnigan
[基金申请] 有没有大神帮我看看基金代码 28+4 1234567wang 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 19:15 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 放榜前的不淡定 20+4 snowwithsea 2026-08-19 19/950 2026-08-25 17:57 by chick875
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
[基金申请] 今日不放榜?网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果 +17 医学老男孩 2026-08-20 22/1100 2026-08-25 15:36 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] 如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑,不妨来听听这首《基金之外》 +8 scalable 2026-08-24 8/400 2026-08-25 12:52 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 没有任何消息-是不是就凉了 +9 图啦图啦 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 11:59 by 南海小哥
[基金申请] 人气不行了 +11 fansofjerry 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-25 11:04 by 孤独的英雄6
[教师之家] 导师吐槽:我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生! +3 苏东坡二世 2026-08-23 3/150 2026-08-25 10:35 by shisan1313
[基金申请] 让我中一个面上吧! +13 大萍1987 2026-08-20 16/800 2026-08-24 10:23 by 太傻了
信息提示
请填处理意见