24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2753  |  回复: 15
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

springs111

银虫 (正式写手)

[求助] material and design的修改稿格式问题

各位大侠,最近投了一篇material and design,要求修改,但不知道到时候要提交些什么文件,修改稿加Detailed responses to Reviews是否可行,还需要什么东西吗?谢谢!另外,看看我这Reviewers' comments,是算大修还是小修。接受的机会大吗?我补上拉伸性能的数据( tensile test)。谢谢

Reviewer #1: 1. In general, hardness measure has large error. How can the authors ensure the accuracy of measured hardness? Only hardenss data cannot indicate strength properties completely. If the authors can obtain yield strength and ultimate strength of the fire-resistant steel, your experimental data will be full.
> 2. The authors have not further prepared low Mo content (below 0.3 wt%) class fire-resistant steel ant tested its strength properties. This will not support the authors' conclusions well.
> 3. Some metallographic images are not clear, which cannot clearly show different phases.
> 4. There are some spelling and grammatic mistakes.
>
>
>
> Reviewer #2: The authors investigated the effect of Mo addition to the fire resistant steel and discussed different strengthen mechanisms based on the hardness data, however, the most important characteristic of fire resistant steel is that the yeild strength at 600 degree, usually this vale should be obtained using high-temperature tensile system.  unfortunately I can not find such information in the present work. The value of high temperature hardness provided in the present work is not a suitable variable to evaluate the materials properties, it is necessary to conduct similar tensile tests to demonstrate the properties more clearly.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

springs111

银虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by 20020824 at 2011-07-09 22:06:34:
楼主这篇文章从投稿到给消息花了多长时间啊?

送审之后10天就给消息了!
3楼2011-07-09 22:10:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 16 个回答

20020824

金虫 (正式写手)


zhenghaiw(金币+1): 感谢参与 2011-07-09 22:16:28
楼主这篇文章从投稿到给消息花了多长时间啊?
2楼2011-07-09 22:06:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jiamaolee

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

springs111(金币+10): 谢谢! 2011-07-10 15:41:19
应该算小修吧。第1个审稿人的第2点也比较重要,要有低含量Mo的有关强度数据,更好的支持你的观点。其它的好像没什么的
4楼2011-07-10 05:49:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mzooen

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

springs111(金币+10): 很详细,谢谢,金相放倍数大点的就问题不大吧! 2011-07-10 15:42:58
应该算大修吧,第一个审稿人有些问题说的不太明确用的都是some,没有具体指出是那个,第二个说的和第一个的第一条差不多。重新磨磨金像补个热拉伸应该没有问题。
5楼2011-07-10 09:04:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见