应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » Materials and Design给的修改意见，算是大改还是小改？？？
201/2返回列表12下一页
查看: 2519  |  回复: 19
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

cai05330

金虫 (小有名气)

[交流] Materials and Design给的修改意见，算是大改还是小改？？？ 已有15人参与

Dear Mr ****,

The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form.

However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript.

Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments.

If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also:

a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments
   
  AND/OR

b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed


To submit your revision, please do the following:

1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jmad/

2. Enter your login details

3. Click [Author Login]
This takes you to the Author Main Menu.

4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision]

When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication.  If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.

I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Yours sincerely,

K.L. Edwards
Editor in Chief
Materials and Design

Reviewers' comments:
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼 2010-10-08 12:37:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yensh

金虫 (文坛精英)

优秀版主
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
状态栏应该有标明的~~~
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
ID已经更换，此ID作废
2楼2010-10-08 12:57:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cai05330

金虫 (小有名气)
问题在于没有，状态栏只有个revise
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2010-10-08 12:59:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nanopony

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀区长
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
不管它大改小改，你认真改就是了
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
欲取其中，必求其上；欲取其上，必求其上上。
4楼2010-10-08 13:03:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wwmwwm

银虫 (正式写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
要好好改,

一般地修改稿还要送到原审稿人手中，稍不如意，有可能毙掉。

我就有惨痛教训。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
i_come_from_the_village
5楼2010-10-08 14:39:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhiyongwang

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
给你机会修改就有戏呢，好好改！！！祝福好运
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
6楼2010-10-08 14:59:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liyugui2008

木虫 (小有名气)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
审稿人有他的见解，按照他的一见会有好处的
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
7楼2010-10-08 15:16:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

陈小婷

铜虫 (小有名气)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
给机会改就是好事，祝你的文章早日被接受
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
8楼2010-10-08 15:19:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaoyaobang

木虫 (著名写手)
审稿意见呢？这是主编的套话，返修的都是这些话。
赞一下 回复此楼
9楼2010-10-08 15:27:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cai05330

金虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
Originally posted by zhaoyaobang at 2010-10-08 15:27:43:
审稿意见呢？这是主编的套话，返修的都是这些话。

以下是审稿意见，各位给鉴定一下吧
Reviewer #1:

1)    The paper studies the "Constitutive analysis to elevated temperature flow stress in Ti-6Al-4V alloy" Overall, the paper is not well introduction & discussion. But the date of Ti base materials is is worth publication.
2)    The paper should be clear explain to the microstructure of & + VS. different treatment & plastic deformation. Add to 3.1 : the microstructure Ti6Al4V
3) The authors mentioned that " ..in Fig.7. It could be seen that predicted flow stress values from the developed constitutive equation could track the experimental flow stress throughout the entire strain rate range (particularly at the temperature of 1000 and 1050?). Only in some deformation conditions (i.e. at 800? in 1s-1, 900? in 0.001s-1 and at 950? in 1s-1), a remarkable variation between experimental and computed flow stress data could be observed ", why is "the good prediction capabilities of the developed constitutive equation considering strain compensation." , Please explain the reason in more detail. How the authors reach to the conclusion?
4) The authors mentioned that " effect of strain on the material constants (i.e. ??, n, Q and lnA).. " Please explain a degree of effect factor and the reason in more detail?
   

Reviewer #2:

In this manuscript, studies on the constitutive analysis to elevated temperature flow stress in Ti-6Al-4V alloy are reported. It's very important to study the theoretical simulation about this alloy. Some interesting results were obtained. However, I recommend the authors correct or show some opinions for the following points.

1. In P1L23, the preterite should be selected firstly. e.g., "The importance of this alloy is testified from the fact..", It should be "The importance of this alloy was testified from the fact..". There are many errors in the same. Please check all the paper carefully.
2. Minor errors, such as "It is usually assumed that influence of strain on flow stress...." should be "It is usually assumed that the influence of strain on flow stress.." ; Please check all the paper.
3. Please explain why the experimental data is higher than the simulated data in the temperature of 800,850,900?.
4. I suggest the authors should revise the title which can not match the whole content.
赞一下 回复此楼
10楼2010-10-08 17:00:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 cai05330 的主题更新
201/2返回列表12下一页
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭