24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2860  |  回复: 22
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

leighcl

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] Materials Letters拒稿,帮我看看回信的意思!谢谢

Dear XX,

Thank you for submitting the above paper.

We have now received comments on your paper and regret to say that we must turn this paper down.

For your guidance, comments from the review/s are appended below.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. We will be happy to receive other contributions from you.

Yours sincerely,

Editor-in-Chief

Materials Letters

Editor's/Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer #1: The contents of the paper made to give the following comments:
。。。。。。
To summarize, though the paper has some scientific merits, the authors have exclusively presented experimental results and lack of sufficient discussion can be observed. Therefore, the paper is not acceptable in its present form and the reviewer suggests this manuscript be revised substantially and resubmitted.


这好像是说我按照comments修改后,还可以重新投,是不是?但是如果重新投的话,有希望没?

[ Last edited by leighcl on 2011-6-5 at 03:41 ]
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

专业

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nkb_hit

木虫 (正式写手)

重投的话就如果文章状态是reject and resubmittion的话,就跟正常审稿后大修一样,审稿人也应该不变。
如果文章状态是其他,可能就不是原来的审稿人了。
6楼2011-06-05 14:30:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 23 个回答

crystal215

木虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

leighcl(金币+1): 2011-06-05 12:18:41
审稿人让你重新修改后,可以再投,编辑根据审稿人的意见给拒稿了,好好修改后可以重投,楼主加油!
2楼2011-06-05 06:45:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

James_ever

金虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

引用回帖:
Originally posted by leighcl at 2011-06-05 03:34:12:
Dear XX,

Thank you for submitting the above paper.

We have now received comments on your paper and regret to say that we must turn this paper down.

For your guidance, comments from the re ...

lack of sufficient discussion ......................





合作写写??
Take few risks early, the bonus following!科研MSN群:FutureChina@groups.live.com
3楼2011-06-05 08:04:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nkb_hit

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

leighcl(金币+1): 2011-06-05 12:19:31
建议按照要求改改,重新投稿,还是很有希望的!
审稿人认为你的文章有创新性,就是文章只有数据的罗列,数据分析太少,你按照要求,分析多一点问题,很有希望!
4楼2011-06-05 11:20:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +14 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 15/750 2026-09-02 19:35 by liumei0601
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +7 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 14/700 2026-09-02 17:33 by ma0526
[基金申请] 要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够 +9 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 17/850 2026-09-02 14:04 by anjeeshine
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 10/500 2026-09-02 11:35 by 大不刘6
[基金申请] 学科评审组评审是指会评吗? +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 5/250 2026-09-02 10:13 by 雨冰共舞
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +5 myrtle 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-09-02 02:42 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +6 ssyjh 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-09-01 20:01 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 面上函评意见出来了,像什么等级? 20+4 Tsingking1 2026-08-27 17/850 2026-09-01 19:51 by 超级无敌华子
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +7 gdd2018 2026-08-28 12/600 2026-09-01 08:32 by 尼古拉斯小虫
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +7 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 11/550 2026-08-31 23:16 by hittle2008
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
信息提示
请填处理意见