| 查看: 2190 | 回复: 5 | ||
[求助]
Materials Letters大家看看修改提交后两次返回这样的
|
|
我的邮箱地址换了,收不到邮件,在系统看到的信应该是一样的吧,我已经按照要求提交了,怎么还是这么返回来啊。 The reviewer(s) and editor have evaluated your manuscript "XXXXXXX" (Prof. xxxx). As you will see from the comments below and on http://ees.elsevier.com/mlblue/, moderate revision has been requested. Given that the requested revisions are moderate the new version is required within one month (30 days). To submit a revision, go to http://ees.elsevier.com/mlblue/ and log in as an Author. You will find your submission record under Submission(s) Needing Revision. Please note that resubmissions not received within 30 days may be withdrawn, unless you contact me to extend the deadline. With your resubmission, explain how and where each point of the reviewer's comments has been incorporated. For this, use submission item "Revision Notes" when uploading your revision. Also, indicate the changes in an annotated version of the revised manuscript (submission item "Revision, changes marked" . Should you disagree with any part of the reviews, please explain why. To facilitate further review, add line numbers to the text of your manuscript.Please present any figures, tables etc. as separate files. See the Artwork Guidelines on the home page right menu for further file naming conventions, referencing and format issues. Please upload source files (e.g. Word or LaTeX) of the text and figures. PDF files of the text cannot be handled by the typesetters. Please strictly follow the formatting requirements as presented in the Guide for Authors at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/mlblue. As regards the figures: The cost for colour printing should be met by the author. In order to reduce the cost you may choose to redraw those figures where colour can be substituted by using different graphical shapes. I hope that you will find these comments to be of use to you and am looking forward to receiving your revision. Thank you for submitting your work to this journal. Kind regards, xxxxxxxxx Editor Materials Letters ........................................................... Important note: If a reviewer has provided a review or other materials as attachments, those items will not be in this letter. Please ensure therefore that you log on to the journal site and check if any attachments have been provided. COMMENTS FROM EDITORS AND REVIEWERS |
» 猜你喜欢
有没有人能给点建议
已经有5人回复
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有12人回复
实验室接单子
已经有7人回复
全日制(定向)博士
已经有5人回复
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法,现在跑or等等看?
已经有4人回复
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
参与限项
已经有3人回复
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
所感
已经有4人回复
要不要辞职读博?
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
请问修改稿要求延期提交,是写给主编还是编辑
已经有4人回复
论文修改后一个多月,催稿木有回音
已经有8人回复
materials studio6.0出来了
已经有13人回复
求大家帮我看看什么意思啊
已经有6人回复
materials letters投稿Required Reviews Completed的状态快一个月了
已经有14人回复
Materials Letters 修改稿投稿问题
已经有11人回复
Materials Letters投稿后返回修改
已经有10人回复
修改稿提交后,一般多久有消息?
已经有16人回复
Materials Letters拒稿,帮我看看回信的意思!谢谢
已经有22人回复
materials letters修改稿还送审吗
已经有8人回复
投过Materials Letters的虫友,求助技术审查的修改!
已经有16人回复
杯具--materials letters 两次格式审查没通过 怎么办?
已经有11人回复
croninszl
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
★★★★★★★★★★★
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 22 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.001
- 金币: 6191.8
- 散金: 7530
- 红花: 27
- 帖子: 4446
- 在线: 543.2小时
- 虫号: 131510
- 注册: 2005-12-12
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机合成
2楼2011-05-07 16:48:20
mingminglili
铜虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 23.3
- 散金: 82
- 帖子: 353
- 在线: 95.5小时
- 虫号: 1050986
- 注册: 2010-07-02
- 专业: 电工材料特性及其应用

3楼2011-05-07 17:06:08
4楼2011-05-07 17:20:33
gxp-dhu
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1539.6
- 散金: 600
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 319
- 在线: 202.2小时
- 虫号: 1253220
- 注册: 2011-04-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 纤维
【答案】应助回帖
|
感觉这个期刊要求不高,只要有新意即可 eceived at Editorial Office: 16 Mar 2011 Article revised: 24 Apr 2011 Article accepted for publication: 25 Apr 2011 Received at Elsevier: 26 Apr 2011 Journal publishing agreement sent to author: 28 Apr 2011 Offprint order form sent to author: 28 Apr 2011 PDF offprint: Yes Expected dispatch of proofs: 6 May 2011 |

5楼2011-05-12 21:23:20
hitfujw
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4610.3
- 散金: 81
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 864
- 在线: 22.2小时
- 虫号: 1249599
- 注册: 2011-03-30
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 金属材料的凝固与结晶学

6楼2011-05-13 09:26:41












. Should you disagree with any part of the reviews, please explain why. To facilitate further review, add line numbers to the text of your manuscript.
回复此楼
