24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zjrhust

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 690
帖子: 119
在线: 112.1小时
虫号: 579975

[交流] 请看下这个是大修还是小修

二审编辑意见：The reviewers and the editor believe that the paper requires a major editing effort to qualify. The Abstract contains numerous use-of-English errors as does the rest of the manuscript, which need to be corrected. The second reviewer has indicated several errors throughout the paper. The authors are advised to seek expert help in revising their manuscript as far as the use of English is concerned.

In addition, please respond to the following editor comment:

The STHS problem formulation (1) - (11) neglects the thermal unit commitment. The mathematical formulation (1) - (11) implies that all thermal units on-line during the entire scheduling period, which is nor correct. In addition, several standard thermal unit constraints, such as minimum up / down times, ramp rate limits, as well as system reserve requirements are missing from the STHS formulation. Please, rectify.
二审审稿人意见：新增的审稿人提了一大堆的语法、语句错误（接近30条）。其他审稿人没讲什么了。
这个意见是不是应该算小修啊？

另外，编辑的第二条意见不想修改。不想修改问题模型，因为一旦修改，问题由连续型优化变为混合连续、离散型优化，所提的算法（文章的主要工作在于算法）肯定要做大量修改，且肯定要补一些实验。如果不做修改，该怎么回复编辑？会不会把编辑给惹火了？非常感谢。

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

审稿意见：一个大修，两个小修已经有34人回复
我的第一SCI投稿返回意见了，这个算大修还是小修？ Physica A 已经有11人回复
PRB这样的审稿意见算是大修还是小修？已经有6人回复
大家帮我看看，我这种情况属于大修还是小修？已经有3人回复
第一篇SCI接受的曲折过程：2次大修+1次小修+4次送审。已经有223人回复
一个说据，一个说小修，结果裁定为大修已经有28人回复
主编意思含糊，大家帮着看一下是大修还是小修已经有21人回复
一篇论文大修后小修让改英语。导师要求和我边讨论边修改结果改完后居然出现中文了已经有40人回复
ChemComm从小修变成大修－悲哀阿，痛心阿，百感交集已经有18人回复
大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修？希望大吗？（散50B，每人2个）已经有68人回复
小修变大修，大哭一场！该怎么办？已经有82人回复
帮我看看啊:编辑是要大修还是小修？已经有15人回复
大修之后的小修，怎么办呢？已经有11人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2011-04-07 16:53:57

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

zjrhust

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 690
帖子: 119
在线: 112.1小时
虫号: 579975

引用回帖:

Originally posted by zjrhust at 2011-04-07 16:53:57:
二审编辑意见：The reviewers and the editor believe that the paper requires a major editing effort to qualify. The Abstract contains numerous use-of-English errors as does the rest of the manuscrip ...

这该怎么修啊，是二审，就两个审稿人
第一审稿人：The authors have responded to my points.
第二审稿人：讲了一大堆我的贡献，然后however, the paper needs lot of editing. some are indicated below. 然后下面列了29条我的语法、语句的错误。