| 查看: 429 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
xxwd银虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
【求助/交流】Unstable A260/A230 value in RNA extraction已有2人参与
|
||
|
HI, I am using QIAGEN RNaeasy Mini kit isolate RNA form rats kidney, sometimes the RNA isolated has a low A260/A230 value because of the high 230 absorbtion. (wavelength scanning with Nanodrop(Thermo Fisher) shows a absorption peak near 230nm). I am sure it is not because of my disruption or homogenization problem because using the same homogenate did RNA extraction, sometimes got a low A260/A230 while sometimes absolutely normal. What's more, if the A230 high, then the A260 will be low. I want to know why and what can I do to solve this problem? Thanks! Both Chinese and English responses are welcome. |
» 猜你喜欢
Bioresource Technology期刊,第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了
已经有7人回复
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果
已经有4人回复
真诚求助:手里的省社科项目结项要求主持人一篇中文核心,有什么渠道能发核心吗
已经有8人回复
寻求一种能扛住强氧化性腐蚀性的容器密封件
已经有5人回复
论文投稿,期刊推荐
已经有6人回复
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。
已经有4人回复
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷
已经有14人回复
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢
已经有5人回复
请问有评职称,把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗
已经有5人回复
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
RNA提取A260/A230低,不到1
已经有4人回复
提取椎间盘髓核组织RNA,A260/208<1.5,A230峰值远高于A260、A280峰值,
已经有9人回复
RNA A260/280>2 是神马情况?
已经有20人回复
jhu132llh
荣誉版主 (知名作家)
大洪
- BioEPI: 25
- 应助: 63 (初中生)
- 贵宾: 1.07
- 金币: 11622.1
- 散金: 796
- 红花: 30
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 5128
- 在线: 317小时
- 虫号: 1095066
- 注册: 2010-09-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生殖生物学
- 管辖: 动植物

3楼2011-04-01 10:39:27
★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
amisking(金币+1): 鼓励发帖交流。 2011-04-01 20:20:22
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
amisking(金币+1): 鼓励发帖交流。 2011-04-01 20:20:22
|
What's A230? So far as I know, we use A260/A280 value to judge the conc. of RNA. And , if you realy use A230 and is sure about that, A230 varying with A260 together shows there maybe some phase or structure changes. so your "sometimes" is detect at the same time(I mean duplicate) or at different time? If at different time, maybe your stock situation makes the RNA change its structure, e.g. parts of double strand unwinded to single strand or some. |
2楼2011-04-01 09:04:40













回复此楼