| 查看: 462 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 zoudujian 的 8 个金币 | |||
[交流]
请大家帮忙看一下审稿意见，提提意见拍拍砖。。。
|
|||
|
刚收到自己稿件的审稿意见，第一次投国际期刊的文章，各方面很不给力，请大家帮忙看一下，看看稿件现在处在什么样的状态，还有审稿意见可以从那些方面修改，欢迎大家拍砖。 Ms. Ref. No.: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Title: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Construction & Building Materials Dear Mr. %%%%%, Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/conbuildmat/ and login as an Author. Your username is: %%%%%% If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/CONBUILDMAT/automail_query.asp On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there. Yours sincerely, M Ohtsu Regional Editor Construction & Building Materials Reviewers' comments: The research is conducted on the strain-rate effect of sulfar-damaged concrete. Without good discussion, the paper looses the research significance.（这个被我加粗了，第一次投国际期刊的文章，英文水平实在跟不上，改了很多次了，也按照论坛上发过多篇SCI的牛人们的SCI攻略修正了几遍，结果还是很伤心） In addition, the following corrections are to be made prior to peer review. 1. On page 2 reference is made to Dongming Yan as well as Forquin and Safa - should these contributors not be referenced by way of number? （这一条我实在不明白重点在哪？原文中参考文献引用如下“Dongming Yan studied the strain rate dependent behavior of concrete considering initial static loading history and the influence of temperature and moisture content on the strain rate sensitivity [6-7]. P. Forquin and K.Safa explained the influence of free water on the quasi-static and dynamic strength of concrete in confined compression tests. The dissimilarity between saturated and dried specimens was mainly attributed to an increase of pore pressure inside the saturated concrete during fast experiments [8]”） 2. Page 2 - 2nd paragraph - line 2 - reference is made to "bearing more or less durability failure" - do you mean "resulting in durability failure"? （我承认我又中国英语了一把，本来的意思是“遭受或多或少的耐久性破坏”，看来审稿人没怎么读懂。） 3. On page 3 reference is made to "many structures currently in service will unavoidably suffer from sulphate attack". Why is this the case? Were not sulphate resisting cements available and were they not specified for use? （审稿人比较较真，我写的比较马虎，对于这个意见的解释还能应付的了） 4. Conclusion 4 could be usefully expanded on justifying studying the sulphate phenomenon at higher strain rates and linking it to relevance in practice. In addition what is the likely engineering benefit of strain rate sensitivity being improved by sulphate attack? |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
刚刚收到科研之友邮件
已经有34人回复
-
怎么萃取出锡盐内包裹的化合物
已经有5人回复
-
博后面上和特助今天出吗？
已经有17人回复
-
药学硕士找不到工作，打算去做科研助理了
已经有25人回复
-
国自然青年基金，1A4B能上会吗？青年和面上的上会标准是一样的吗？
已经有12人回复
-
青年和面上，哪个上会难度更大
已经有4人回复
-
怎么带研究生？
已经有13人回复
-
难道我真的要放弃吗？
已经有20人回复
-
在国内某高校做全职博士后2年，现在找到新的单位，出站或退站对新工作有什么影响？
已经有6人回复
-
这个博士要读吗
已经有30人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 帮忙看一下审稿人意见,谢谢
已经有6人回复
- 【交流】在医院药剂科工作，想考药学的博士！大家给提提意见吧~
已经有6人回复
- 【求助】刚拿到了offer的初稿，欲申请CSC的博士奖，请各位给offer提提意见！急！！！
已经有13人回复
- 【求助】我的套磁信和CV，真心希望有人提提意见
已经有12人回复
- 【交流】自己设计的实验室布局图，大家给提提意见
已经有27人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
招保研硕士-化学材料专业-北京交通大学2024年全国优秀大学生暑期夏令营通知
+1/190
-
电力系统虚拟电厂专业领域实习生招聘-广州黄埔
+1/181
-
法国 雷恩大学 CNRS 招收化学方向改派生
+1/175
-
法国 雷恩大学 CNRS 招收化学方向CSC改派生
+1/172
-
信阳师范大学建筑节能材料河南省协同创新中心诚聘光伏方向专家学者和博士研究生
+1/87
-
【专业EPR】：自由基(超氧、羟基、单线态氧)，空位缺陷；定量计算，VX: 761711562
+1/85
-
模糊、破损老照片修复，静态老照片变成动态图片视频
+1/52
-
帮朋友征女友
+1/46
-
博士后招聘（高薪40+）
+1/37
-
天津大学宋照亮教授课题组博士后招聘启事
+1/35
-
天津大学宋照亮教授课题组博士后招聘启事
+1/34
-
浙江大学陆俊/温州大学袁一斐联合招聘二次电池材料方向博士后
+1/33
-
[求助贴]哪位大拿认识河海大学水文水资源学院的老师呀
+1/32
-
Nanomaterials IF=5.3 SCI期刊特刊征稿_宽禁带半导体 Wide-Bandgap Semiconductor
+1/22
-
天津大学宋照亮教授课题组博士后招聘启事
+1/8
-
山东大学化学与化工学院元素有机化学课题组诚聘博士后2名
+1/5
-
中山大学招聘肥胖及糖尿病治疗与纳米医学交叉学科方向博士后
+1/4
-
25申博—材料方向—目前有两篇IF大于15分的一区—硕士课题是阻燃隔热材料
+1/3
-
25年春天博士申请
+1/3
-
作为审稿人，如何评价一篇论文的novelty？
+1/2
+1/190
2楼2011-03-08 16:42:26
3楼2011-03-08 18:56:57
