24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 500  |  回复: 2

cupflysea

铜虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 请大家帮我看看这个审稿人意见 已有2人参与

投了一篇分析方法的文章,被拒了,审稿人反馈意见如下:
The RSD values that can be calculated from the data on table 3 showed that the variability of the measurements are not consistent or easily explained even for the same storage conditions. Especially, the precision for the three freeze-thaw cycles varied between 5.6% (4.56) to 0.084% (121.6). This very narrow interval makes the real value out of the data given by the method. They must consider that the method as proposed is subjected to an interference that clearly affects the reproducibility of the measurements.
请大家帮我看看,我感觉是说方法精密度变异过大,重现性不好。但这句又不知道是什么意思,“This very narrow interval makes the real value out of the data given by the method”,到底是说太大还是太小呢?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jwfu

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

好好修稿i,再投
某某某,有朝一日,一定要你跪下给我添脚~~~
2楼2011-02-25 15:08:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ydniu

铜虫 (正式写手)

祝楼主好运!
3楼2011-02-25 15:09:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 cupflysea 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见