24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ferretl

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 1993.8
帖子: 401
在线: 98小时
虫号: 575656

[交流] 有经验的帮忙看看PRL的这封意见如何回复

给PRL投稿，审稿审了1个月零10天，然后收到编辑这样一封回信，请有经验的帮忙给点意见吧。

Editor的回信：

Dear Dr.XXX,

The above manuscript has been reviewed by our referees.

The resulting reports include a critique which is sufficiently adverse that
we cannot accept your paper on the basis of material now at hand. We enclose
pertinent comments.

If you feel that you can overcome or refute the criticism, you may resubmit
to Physical Review Letters. With any resubmittal, please include a summary o
f changes made and a brief response to all recommendations and criticisms.

Yours sincerely,

共有两个审稿人，都是很正面的意见，都认为很重要且有创新。其中一个搞理论的审稿人认为三个细节问题上小修后应该发表。另一个实验方面的审稿人却在审稿意见的最后给出了下面一段话，认为不应该发表：

However, I consider that a publication in Phys. Rev. Lett. demands other typ
e of results and their analysis. In my opinion, this work is very important
for applied physics and should be published in other journals such as Appl.
Phys., Appl. Phys. Lett., Appl. Surf. Science and others. I don't recommend
publishing this manuscript in Phys.Rev.Lett.

这种情况还有希望吗？

回复此楼