应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 投了一篇letter在synthetic metal上被退回来了，编辑的信大家帮我看看。
81/1返回列表
查看: 1532  |  回复: 7
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

阿秋

金虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 投了一篇letter在synthetic metal上被退回来了，编辑的信大家帮我看看。

Dear Mr XXX,

The reviewers have commented on your paper entitled 'XXXXXXXXXXX'. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form.

However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript.

Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments when revising your manuscript. Should you choose to send a revised version of your paper, please do so within two months; otherwise, it may be considered by this office as a new submission.

Also, if you are submitting a revised manuscript, please enclose the following:

a) A letter fully addressing the changes you have incorporated into the revised manuscript in accordance with the referee's recommendations.

b) A copy of your revised manuscript showing the changes highlighted. The highlighting can be done in bold, underlined or highlighted font. Please write "highlighted" in the top right corner of this document.

c) A copy of the un-highlighted revised manuscript.

To submit your revision, please do the following:

1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/synmet/

2. Enter your login details

3. Click [Author Login]
This takes you to the Author Main Menu.

4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision]

Bear in mind your revision should be submitted by Apr 05, 2011.

Please note, the revised manuscript is also subject to additional review. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Sincerely,
XXXXXX
Regional Editor
Synthetic Metals

Reviewers' comments:

Your manuscript contains ample places where the English language is not very well understood; or that have grammar mistakes and spelling faults. I therefore recommend you revise the manuscript; please check it thoroughly before we even send it to potential reviewers.
Also please suggest three potential referees for your manuscript.



大家帮我看看  我特别是对中间的a) b) c)三条不是很懂
还有 Bear in mind your revision should be submitted by Apr 05, 2011 这句是让你的4月5号投还是在4月5号之前投啊
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼2011-02-19 15:13:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cai05330

金虫 (小有名气)
★
猪会飞(金币+1): 鼓励交流 2011-02-19 16:41:30
阿秋(金币+10): 2011-02-19 17:35:03

什么吗，审稿结束，你的文章要求修改，而不是编辑给你退回来了。要求你单独写一个letter表明你修改的部分，很多期刊是detail revise to reviews，里面回答你对审稿人给出的意见，小木虫有很多模板可以供使用。b和c要求你上传两份修改稿，一份要求将修改的地方高亮，另一份不需要高亮以用于录用后排版
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
2楼2011-02-19 16:29:26
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ocnzhao

木虫 (正式写手)
阿秋(金币+2): 2011-02-19 17:35:11
阿秋(金币+1): 2011-02-19 17:35:43
Apr 05, 2011是2011年4月5号
修改后符合出版要求即可

[ Last edited by ocnzhao on 2011-2-19 at 16:33 ]
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2011-02-19 16:31:12
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
阿秋(金币+4): 2011-02-19 17:35:32
阿秋(金币+1): 2011-02-19 17:35:50
引用回帖:
Originally posted by cai05330 at 2011-02-19 08:29:26:
什么吗，审稿结束，你的文章要求修改，而不是编辑给你退回来了。要求你单独写一个letter表明你修改的部分，很多期刊是detail revise to reviews，里面回答你对审稿人给出的意见，小木虫有很多模板可以供使用。b和 ...

"please suggest three potential referees for your manuscript" 应该还没有审稿。主要是语言问题，需要先好好改一下。

[ Last edited by visitor958 on 2011-2-19 at 19:19 ]
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2011-02-19 16:33:28
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cai05330

金虫 (小有名气)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
引用回帖:
Originally posted by visitor958 at 2011-02-19 08:33:28:
"please suggest three potential referees for your manuscript" 应该还没有审稿。主要是语言问题，需要先好好改一下。

The reviewers have commented on your paper entitled 'XXXXXXXXXXX

这句话表明应该是审过了
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
6楼2011-02-19 17:56:33
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

前面是系统信件的模板，后面才是编辑的话。“please check it thoroughly before we even send it to potential reviewers.”，还要推荐审稿人。 当然，编辑看了就算审，我也无话可说了。
赞一下 回复此楼
7楼2011-02-19 19:17:47
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

rapidtest

捐助贵宾 (正式写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
尽管reviewers建议拒稿，但编辑可能觉得文章有价值，所以给了一次修改机会，而且不算新投；再投后编辑打算让新的reviewers评审，所以让再推荐reviewers。

[ Last edited by rapidtest on 2011-2-19 at 23:19 ]
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
8楼2011-02-19 23:17:07
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
angelkiss5楼
2011-02-19 16:52   回复  
阿秋(金币+2): 2011-02-19 17:36:06
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 阿秋 的主题更新
81/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭