24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

pyms23

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 56.1
散金: 90
帖子: 66
在线: 22小时
虫号: 1140276
注册: 2010-11-06
专业: 计算机应用技术

[交流] 第一次投稿被拒了，大家帮我看看还有没有希望修改后重投。谢谢！！！！！已有6人参与

审稿96天被拒，编辑的意思是：
I am the manging editor in charge of your submission.
Your paper was sent to two referees who have worked extensively on this topic. Both have now responded.

As you can see from the reports, both referees felt that the paper is not rigorously written and it looks more like notes for an article than a completed paper. While Referee 1 is a little more positive, Referee 2 recommended rejection. As a result of this, I am sorry to inform you that we are unable to
publish your paper.

主编所说的第一个审稿人
This paper is potentially interesting for the readers of XXXXXXXXXXX
because it contains some original research. However, I have comments on five major
points that I think should be clarified or improved in order to better understand the
messages from the paper, namely: 1) highlighting the originality of the research; 2) the
clearness of the presented methodology; 3) the data sources used for the empirical
analysis; 4) the very poor quality of citations and references; 5) the quality of the
English used in the paper.

这个审稿人所提的问题大多比较容易解决，后面还有大概两页的审稿意见，这里不多累述，感觉好像没有直接把我拒了。

第二个审稿人只给了短短一页的意见：
This is an applied piece of research that tries to measure XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, and make comparisons with other XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.
To some extent, the paper is still at a preliminary stage, in what refers to the
presentation and explanation of the results.
On the one hand, the authors refer to different XXXXXXXXXXXXXX measurement proposals
(which are not new to this paper and are not used in this paper) that are presented in a
not rigorous way:
- They do not use a homogeneous nomenclature when they present different
“models of XXXXXXXXXX”
- They give expressions for a continuous and a discrete variable in an
unspecified way.
- Some expressions for XXXXXXXXXXXX are not correct.
- They designate XXXXXXXXXX as Di(x), where i refers to
AAAAA and x to BBBBBBBBBB should not appear none of them.
- They state that “the relation between AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA and BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB is like “S” shape” without stating any reference….
From the beginning the authors talk about the XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
without giving any intuition of the concept until its definition in page 6.
The authors should make an effort to provide the motivation of the study of XXXXXXXXXXXXX and to improve the discussion of the results, as it is very cursory
in its current version.
Finally, the articles mentioned through the text are not correctly referenced. In many
cases the name of the author is referred together with the surname

麻烦大家帮我看一下编辑以及审稿人的态度。这篇文章花了我很多心血，我搞不清楚按审稿人意思修改以后重投还有没有希望。还应不应该投这个杂志.....

回复此楼