应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 化学化工区 » 电化学 » 电分析测试 » 【讨论】我投analytical letters 审稿人说我？？？ 求大家帮我分析怎么改进？？？急
21/1返回列表
查看: 395  |  回复: 1
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

pies112

铁虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 【讨论】我投analytical letters 审稿人说我？？？ 求大家帮我分析怎么改进？？？急

首先感谢大家！
但是我很着急， 我过年的心情都没了， 大家帮帮我，审稿人的意思是要和其他相似的传感器做比较么？
从覆盖度和电子转移速率方面，对过氧化氢的催化校正曲线都是从0开始的么？？？
匮乏的分析内容指的是？？？
The work is well carried out but has very little analytical content, merely a few measurements of hydrogen peroxide to demonstrate electrocatalysis giving an analytical curve with non-zero intercept. No comparison is made between the merits of this peroxide sensor with others in the literature and should be. I therefore cannot recommend it for publication in this journal.

Referee: 2
My main problem with the manuscript is that there is no experimental evidence shown about the applicability of the electrode. No real analytical application has been tried. No comparison with other methods or electrodes in solving special tasks. There are very many paper dealing with the electrode reactions of hemoglobin, similarly about response of hydrogen peroxide in different electrodes. The only novelty- I can guess- can be structure, and preparation procedure of the polymer film. (The detailed preparation procedure has been reported elsewhere). I hope the revised copy will be extended that direction

I agree withthat it will be necessary to enhance the novelty and analytical content of the paper. It will be necessary to employ the device for practical analysis of real (not spiked) samples, and to compare the device to previously described similar devices.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼 2011-02-08 19:40:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

pies112

铁虫 (正式写手)

看来都过年呢啊

顶起
回复此楼
2楼2011-02-09 08:54:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 pies112 的主题更新
21/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭