24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 3874  |  回复: 37
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zhangtetsu

铁虫 (小有名气)


[交流] 请有经验人士看看这个审稿意见是怎么回事?

我前一段时间投了Pattern Recognition Letters. 我的第一篇期刊。
技术审查让我改了一次参考文献格式和语言问题。

重新提交后过了不到一个礼拜就回来了这个审稿意见。就一个审稿人,意见也没有关于技术问题的。编辑说大修,给两个月,但是deadline又是4个月以后。

这个算是什么啊,很迷茫。是不是我的文章审稿人就没看?

下面是审稿意见,总感觉是技术审查被退回来了一样。

The Editorial Office has received the decision on your article.

The Reviewers' comments are as follows:

***********************************************************

Dear Authors,

Thank you for telling us about your previous publication of a conference paper with contents linked to your PATREC submission. When you are extending a conference paper for journal publication, it is absolutely essential that you list the conference paper in the References, which you do not. In the Introduction the conference paper should be cited and you should explain what further developments are presented in the current paper. Otherwise the reviewers cannot judge the originality of the paper.

Also note that Pattern Recognition Letters is a Letters Journal, publishing short papers, with a maximum of about 5000 words and about seven figures plus tables. You should try to limit the number of figures in your paper.

***********************************************************

In view of the comments made, the Associate Editor responsible for your article has decided that the paper can be reconsidered for publication after major revisions. Therefore we look forward to receiving the revised version of the article as soon as possible, but WITHIN TWO MONTHS, together with a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised.

If we do not receive your revision within the 2-month period (deadline: 08-06-2011), your paper will be considered withdrawn. Any revision after this will be treated as a new submission and subject to a new review cycle.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangtetsu

铁虫 (小有名气)


引用回帖:
Originally posted by zhangtetsu at 2011-02-04 23:14:16:
我前一段时间投了Pattern Recognition Letters. 我的第一篇期刊。
技术审查让我改了一次参考文献格式和语言问题。

重新提交后过了不到一个礼拜就回来了这个审稿意见。就一个审稿人,意见也没有关于技术问题的 ...

补充一下,其实我的会议文章引用了,不过没在introduction里。审稿人就说我没引。。。。
2楼2011-02-04 23:15:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangtetsu

铁虫 (小有名气)


引用回帖:
Originally posted by paperhunter at 2011-02-04 23:36:36:
审稿人看了楼主的文章,并查阅了相关的文献,估计是发现楼主的会议文章没有引用(其实是引用了),所以终止了审稿,要求楼主说明所投文章在会议论文的基础上做了多少扩展。

实际上是我投稿时候就说明了我的文章曾经发表在会议上。
看来我需要改改introduction,阐述一下进行的改进。

其实第二条更让我头疼,我现在有14个图,要减到7个左右。。。。
6楼2011-02-04 23:54:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangtetsu

铁虫 (小有名气)


引用回帖:
Originally posted by visitor958 at 2011-02-04 23:24:09:
就是要你修改后重投,然后送审。会议文章要引用,现在很多杂志要求这样,特别是会议和杂志不属于一个系列。

谢谢!
7楼2011-02-04 23:54:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zhangtetsu 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见