| 查看: 2077 | 回复: 7 | |||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||||
enola捐助贵宾 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
【转帖】半芯太电子 Semi-Core electron 已有5人参与
|
||||
|
半芯太电子。。。 When we build a pseudopotential (psp), we froze the inner core states and treat only the valence electrons due to the fact that the properties of materials are largely determined by the outer-layer valence electrons. In order to obtain a psp with good transferability, there should be very small overlap between core and valence electron distributions which is true for most light elements. For most the elements, the overlap between core and valence electron can be so large that the psp built in the usual way cannot lead to the correct properties of materials composed of that element (e.g., Na, K). There are two methods to solve the above problem. 1) Nonlinear core correction, we use an artificial core charge distribution to replace the real core charge distribution. When building psp, we substract the contribution to Vxc and VHartree, which comes from the artificial core, and when using the psp, add the corresponding ones (see PRB 26, 1378). When doing nonlinear core correction, we don't increase the number of valence electrons but only increase the cutoff energy for plane-wave calculations due to the added core. 2) Semicore states, which means including some states that you usually treat as core states when you build a pseudopotential. For example, when building a psp for Ca, we not only include 4s, 4p, 3d but also include 3s, 3p in the valence states. For this method, we include a lot more electrons (e.g. 8 more e/atom for Ca), and also need a much large cutoff energy because we have included much more localized 3s, 3p electrons. So including semicore states will result in much harder calculations. In fact, for most cases, nonlinear core correction is already enough for a good psp and including semicore states is kind of overkill. So my suggestion is: use the nonlinear core correction when you need it, use semicore states unless you have to. |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 VASP | vasp应用 |
» 猜你喜欢
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有11人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有8人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 网管和黑客都必须知道的命令!看了不要做坏事!【原创】
已经有8人回复
- 好看的小说：媚公卿 已搜索无重复
已经有22人回复
- 王羲之圣教序（高清全彩珍藏版 ）【转载】
已经有102人回复
- 【求助】离子注入与电子辐射的区别
已经有7人回复
- 【分享】《这才是中医》罗大伦【已搜索无重复】
已经有206人回复
enola
捐助贵宾 (正式写手)
- 1ST强帖: 2
- 应助: 13 (小学生)
- 金币: 1485.9
- 散金: 1549
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 847
- 在线: 102.5小时
- 虫号: 947564
- 注册: 2010-01-24
- 专业: 半导体光电子器件
4楼2011-01-10 08:56:01
zhangguangping
木虫 (著名写手)
- 1ST强帖: 23
- 应助: 71 (初中生)
- 贵宾: 0.031
- 金币: 1974.1
- 散金: 9059
- 红花: 79
- 帖子: 2681
- 在线: 2128.8小时
- 虫号: 529624
- 注册: 2008-03-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 原子和分子物理
3楼2011-01-09 20:39:34
zhangguangping
木虫 (著名写手)
- 1ST强帖: 23
- 应助: 71 (初中生)
- 贵宾: 0.031
- 金币: 1974.1
- 散金: 9059
- 红花: 79
- 帖子: 2681
- 在线: 2128.8小时
- 虫号: 529624
- 注册: 2008-03-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 原子和分子物理
5楼2011-01-10 11:17:27
enola
捐助贵宾 (正式写手)
- 1ST强帖: 2
- 应助: 13 (小学生)
- 金币: 1485.9
- 散金: 1549
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 847
- 在线: 102.5小时
- 虫号: 947564
- 注册: 2010-01-24
- 专业: 半导体光电子器件
6楼2011-01-12 08:51:22
30