| 查看: 1228 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
[交流]
英译汉已翻译，请求润色。
|
|||
|
It is the locus of this practice, the institution itself, that is the thing most lacking from Bowman’s analysis. The ivory tower, a solid, if lofty, metaphor for the academy, seems here to have melted into air. The matter of institutional context is absent. That disciplines are textual, that the institutional is textual, is not in doubt. There is, how-ever, a reluctance to read these texts as anything more than published scholarship. The greater fabric of the institution, of the contemporary university, the bodies, the buildings, the stuff ideas inhabit and are inscribed within, appears tangential to Bowman. His few remarks about pedagogy, specifically about teaching cultural studies, are disparaging. He mocks the notion that “teaching can consciously educate others and that these others might somehow ‘do something’ with the knowledge cultural studies has given them” (191). 制度本身正是这次实践的原因所在,这是鲍曼（氏）分析中最缺乏的东西。从象牙塔里走出来，一个坚固、高雅的隐喻学问，似乎在这里已经融化了到空中。体制方面的问题不存在。这学科的制度是文本，这是是毫无疑问的。有不愿读作任何事情比公布这些文本奖学金更多。对当代大学机构，建筑物，内在的思想都与鲍曼的观念看起来似乎很远。他很少评论教育学，特别是关于教学中的文化研究，这是一种蔑视。他嘲笑这个概念，即“教育教学能自觉他人，这些人可能会以某种方式来做他们的知识文化研究”(191)。 It is, however, these others, the student body, who usually end up leaving the “cloistered privacy of academic institutions” (125).Bowman is correct to query whether the effects of teaching can be guaranteed, but he appears to underestimate its political potential: the power of the contingent. The things that occur in lectures and seminars can “go unrecognized and are unpredictable in their effects” (McQuillan, 53), but this does not mean we should deny their possibility. Post-Marxism versus Cultural Studies teaches the reader many things. The theorization it offers of post-Marxism’s current failings, for instance, is a tour de force. It does not, however, afford enough attention to pedagogy as a textual practice of freedom, as a form of articulation and an act of intervention. It does not start to do justice to teaching. 学生们最终会离开“与世隔绝隐私的学术机构”(125)。鲍曼的质疑是正确的，教学的效果是否可以得到保证？但他似乎低估了其政治潜力：意外的力量。在讲座和研讨会上发生的事情有可能是“难以识别的，在他们的影响不可预测的”(麦奎伦，53)，但这并不意味着我们应该否认他们的可能性。后马克思主义与文化研究相比，交给读者许多东西。理论化的后马克思主义是当前的失败体，举例来说，它是一个绝技。但是，它没有能够承担起足够的重视，教育学作为自由的原始形式，作为衔接的一种形式和一种干预的方式。他对教学是不公平的。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
271材料工程求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
281求调剂（0805）
已经有16人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
材料工程专硕调剂
已经有6人回复
-
一志愿天大材料与化工（085600）总分338
已经有4人回复
-
085700资源与环境308求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
求材料调剂
已经有8人回复
-
294求调剂材料与化工专硕
已经有5人回复
-
一志愿华中科技大学，080502，354分求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿吉林大学材料学硕321求调剂
已经有6人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
持续创业者，A8离异男征婚，事业遇到瓶颈，寻找创业生活伴侣
+1/485
-
祈福2026国基面上项目
+5/350
-
中国科学院杭州医学研究-常皓研究员课题组博士后招聘
+1/288
-
南京医科大学生殖医学与子代健康国重实验室-董飞宏课题组-学术硕士招生
+1/95
-
济南大学林秀娟教授招收材料类博士生
+1/87
-
福建师范大学招收2026年化学、材料硕士3-4名
+1/78
-
愿遇见你，遇见不止擦肩而过的缘分
+1/75
-
湘潭大学化工学院国家级人才团队2026年博士研究生招生
+1/64
-
山东师范大学有机化学专业胡忠燕老师课题组招收2026届硕士研究生以及调剂生
+1/40
-
湘潭大学“过程强化与绿色化工”创新团队补招2026年秋入学博士生
+1/35
-
催化方向推荐一个极好的博导
+1/35
-
西北工业大学光子学研究团队诚聘博士后！
+2/34
-
天津工业大学航空航天博士招生
+1/32
-
北京航空航天大学招生微流控与智能打印技术方向博士研究生
+2/26
-
学术/专业硕士调剂——化学、资源与环境
+1/15
-
南开大学罗景山教授课题组招收2026年入学博士生（光/电催化方向）
+2/14
-
香港大学David Srolovitz教授课题组招聘「香江学者」博士后
+1/7
-
上海科技大学招收有机化学方向招收2026级工程博士
+1/6
-
巴塞罗那自治大学（UAB）-巴塞罗那材料研究所（ICMAB）招收博士研究生
+1/2
-
Top-88悉尼科技大学数据科学/AI 招收2027年入学 校奖 博士生1到2名(国际和本地学生）
+1/1
2楼2010-12-28 16:32:15
3楼2010-12-28 18:15:47
或者改成求英译汉
|
It is the locus of this practice, the institution itself, that is the thing most lacking from Bowman’s analysis. The ivory tower, a solid, if lofty, metaphor for the academy, seems here to have melted into air. The matter of institutional context is absent. That disciplines are textual, that the institutional is textual, is not in doubt. There is, how-ever, a reluctance to read these texts as anything more than published scholarship. The greater fabric of the institution, of the contemporary university, the bodies, the buildings, the stuff ideas inhabit and are inscribed within, appears tangential to Bowman. His few remarks about pedagogy, specifically about teaching cultural studies, are disparaging. He mocks the notion that “teaching can consciously educate others and that these others might somehow ‘do something’ with the knowledge cultural studies has given them” (191). It is, however, these others, the student body, who usually end up leaving the “cloistered privacy of academic institutions” (125).Bowman is correct to query whether the effects of teaching can be guaranteed, but he appears to underestimate its political potential: the power of the contingent. The things that occur in lectures and seminars can “go unrecognized and are unpredictable in their effects” (McQuillan, 53), but this does not mean we should deny their possibility. Post-Marxism versus Cultural Studies teaches the reader many things. The theorization it offers of post-Marxism’s current failings, for instance, is a tour de force. It does not, however, afford enough attention to pedagogy as a textual practice of freedom, as a form of articulation and an act of intervention. It does not start to do justice to teaching. |
4楼2010-12-29 15:46:34
5楼2011-01-03 18:46:50
