应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台» 学术交流区» 论文翻译 » 论文翻译求助完结子版 » 英译汉已翻译，请求润色。
51/1返回列表
查看: 1201  |  回复: 4
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

dmt110

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 英译汉已翻译，请求润色。

It is the locus of this practice, the institution itself, that is the thing most lacking from Bowman’s analysis. The ivory tower, a solid, if lofty, metaphor for the academy, seems here to have melted into air. The matter of institutional context is absent. That disciplines are textual, that the institutional is textual, is not in doubt. There is, how-ever, a reluctance to read these texts as anything more than published scholarship. The greater fabric of the institution, of the contemporary university, the bodies, the buildings, the stuff ideas inhabit and are inscribed within, appears tangential to Bowman. His few remarks about pedagogy, specifically about teaching cultural studies, are disparaging. He mocks the notion that “teaching can consciously educate others and that these others might somehow ‘do something’ with the knowledge cultural studies has given them” (191).
制度本身正是这次实践的原因所在,这是鲍曼（氏）分析中最缺乏的东西。从象牙塔里走出来，一个坚固、高雅的隐喻学问，似乎在这里已经融化了到空中。体制方面的问题不存在。这学科的制度是文本，这是是毫无疑问的。有不愿读作任何事情比公布这些文本奖学金更多。对当代大学机构，建筑物，内在的思想都与鲍曼的观念看起来似乎很远。他很少评论教育学，特别是关于教学中的文化研究，这是一种蔑视。他嘲笑这个概念，即“教育教学能自觉他人，这些人可能会以某种方式来做他们的知识文化研究”(191)。

It is, however, these others, the student body, who usually end up leaving the “cloistered privacy of academic institutions” (125).Bowman is correct to query whether the effects of teaching can be guaranteed, but he appears to underestimate its political potential: the power of the contingent. The things that occur in lectures and seminars can “go unrecognized and are unpredictable in their effects” (McQuillan, 53), but this does not mean we should deny their possibility. Post-Marxism versus Cultural Studies teaches the reader many things. The theorization it offers of post-Marxism’s current failings, for instance, is a tour de force. It does not, however, afford enough attention to pedagogy as a textual practice of freedom, as a form of articulation and an act of intervention. It does not start to do justice to teaching.
学生们最终会离开“与世隔绝隐私的学术机构”(125)。鲍曼的质疑是正确的，教学的效果是否可以得到保证？但他似乎低估了其政治潜力：意外的力量。在讲座和研讨会上发生的事情有可能是“难以识别的，在他们的影响不可预测的”(麦奎伦，53)，但这并不意味着我们应该否认他们的可能性。后马克思主义与文化研究相比，交给读者许多东西。理论化的后马克思主义是当前的失败体，举例来说，它是一个绝技。但是，它没有能够承担起足够的重视，教育学作为自由的原始形式，作为衔接的一种形式和一种干预的方式。他对教学是不公平的。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼 2010-12-28 12:19:00
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zerohead

禁虫 (职业作家)
dmt110(金币+3, 翻译EPI+1):这位大侠，能否抽空全部都帮我修改一下？ 2010-12-29 08:26:07
The ivory tower, a solid, if lofty, metaphor for the academy, seems here to have melted into air.

这一句应该要这样翻：

学术研究机构只是个象牙塔这个文雅又实在的隐喻，在这里好像并不恰当。
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2010-12-28 18:15:47
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 5 个回答

dmt110

至尊木虫 (著名写手)
没有人应答啊？
回复此楼
2楼2010-12-28 16:32:15
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dmt110

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

或者改成求英译汉

It is the locus of this practice, the institution itself, that is the thing most lacking from Bowman’s analysis. The ivory tower, a solid, if lofty, metaphor for the academy, seems here to have melted into air. The matter of institutional context is absent. That disciplines are textual, that the institutional is textual, is not in doubt. There is, how-ever, a reluctance to read these texts as anything more than published scholarship. The greater fabric of the institution, of the contemporary university, the bodies, the buildings, the stuff ideas inhabit and are inscribed within, appears tangential to Bowman. His few remarks about pedagogy, specifically about teaching cultural studies, are disparaging. He mocks the notion that “teaching can consciously educate others and that these others might somehow ‘do something’ with the knowledge cultural studies has given them” (191).

It is, however, these others, the student body, who usually end up leaving the “cloistered privacy of academic institutions” (125).Bowman is correct to query whether the effects of teaching can be guaranteed, but he appears to underestimate its political potential: the power of the contingent. The things that occur in lectures and seminars can “go unrecognized and are unpredictable in their effects” (McQuillan, 53), but this does not mean we should deny their possibility. Post-Marxism versus Cultural Studies teaches the reader many things. The theorization it offers of post-Marxism’s current failings, for instance, is a tour de force. It does not, however, afford enough attention to pedagogy as a textual practice of freedom, as a form of articulation and an act of intervention. It does not start to do justice to teaching.
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2010-12-29 15:46:34
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dmt110

至尊木虫 (著名写手)
问题已解决，请版主归还金币！谢谢！
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2011-01-03 18:46:50
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 5 个回答
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭