| 查看: 1226 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
[交流]
英译汉已翻译，请求润色。
|
|||
|
It is the locus of this practice, the institution itself, that is the thing most lacking from Bowman’s analysis. The ivory tower, a solid, if lofty, metaphor for the academy, seems here to have melted into air. The matter of institutional context is absent. That disciplines are textual, that the institutional is textual, is not in doubt. There is, how-ever, a reluctance to read these texts as anything more than published scholarship. The greater fabric of the institution, of the contemporary university, the bodies, the buildings, the stuff ideas inhabit and are inscribed within, appears tangential to Bowman. His few remarks about pedagogy, specifically about teaching cultural studies, are disparaging. He mocks the notion that “teaching can consciously educate others and that these others might somehow ‘do something’ with the knowledge cultural studies has given them” (191). 制度本身正是这次实践的原因所在,这是鲍曼（氏）分析中最缺乏的东西。从象牙塔里走出来，一个坚固、高雅的隐喻学问，似乎在这里已经融化了到空中。体制方面的问题不存在。这学科的制度是文本，这是是毫无疑问的。有不愿读作任何事情比公布这些文本奖学金更多。对当代大学机构，建筑物，内在的思想都与鲍曼的观念看起来似乎很远。他很少评论教育学，特别是关于教学中的文化研究，这是一种蔑视。他嘲笑这个概念，即“教育教学能自觉他人，这些人可能会以某种方式来做他们的知识文化研究”(191)。 It is, however, these others, the student body, who usually end up leaving the “cloistered privacy of academic institutions” (125).Bowman is correct to query whether the effects of teaching can be guaranteed, but he appears to underestimate its political potential: the power of the contingent. The things that occur in lectures and seminars can “go unrecognized and are unpredictable in their effects” (McQuillan, 53), but this does not mean we should deny their possibility. Post-Marxism versus Cultural Studies teaches the reader many things. The theorization it offers of post-Marxism’s current failings, for instance, is a tour de force. It does not, however, afford enough attention to pedagogy as a textual practice of freedom, as a form of articulation and an act of intervention. It does not start to do justice to teaching. 学生们最终会离开“与世隔绝隐私的学术机构”(125)。鲍曼的质疑是正确的，教学的效果是否可以得到保证？但他似乎低估了其政治潜力：意外的力量。在讲座和研讨会上发生的事情有可能是“难以识别的，在他们的影响不可预测的”(麦奎伦，53)，但这并不意味着我们应该否认他们的可能性。后马克思主义与文化研究相比，交给读者许多东西。理论化的后马克思主义是当前的失败体，举例来说，它是一个绝技。但是，它没有能够承担起足够的重视，教育学作为自由的原始形式，作为衔接的一种形式和一种干预的方式。他对教学是不公平的。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
298-一志愿中国农业大学-求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
297求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
302求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
266求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
化学工程321分求调剂
已经有17人回复
-
344求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
312求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
一志愿天津大学化学工艺专业（081702）315分求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
288求调剂，一志愿华南理工大学071005
已经有4人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有13人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
南京大学智能驱动与感知材料实验室诚招博士/硕士/科研助理/访问学生
+1/279
-
南京医科大学生殖医学与子代健康国重实验室-董飞宏课题组-学术硕士招生
+1/95
-
温州大学吕晶晶课题组2026年招生
+1/81
-
福建师范大学招收2026年化学、材料硕士3-4名
+1/78
-
河南工学院诚聘优秀凝聚态物理和电子科学与技术相关专业硕博研究生
+2/42
-
南开大学罗景山教授课题组招聘博士后（光/电催化、钙钛矿光伏方向）
+2/34
-
澳大利亚西澳大学（UWA）张金强课题组招收全奖博士生（化工新能源方向）
+1/32
-
华南师范大学（211）申请审核制博士招生- 电子、自动化、机械、生物学、物理相关专业
+1/25
-
青岛科技大学可持续高分子团队 考研招生
+1/7
-
26年博士招生
+1/6
-
上海第二工业大学-朱大海课题组招生（过线就能调剂）
+1/5
-
双一流天津工业大学电信学院李鸿强教授招收2026年申请审核制博士3名
+1/5
-
博后即将出站，求稳定的教职
+1/3
-
国家杰青低维材料与器件力学团队2026年招收博士研究生
+1/3
-
深圳大学蔡兴科课题组博士后及研究助理招聘
+1/2
-
125603工业工程与管理调剂
+1/2
-
上海交通大学化学化工学院张智涛课题组诚聘博士后
+1/2
-
Top-88悉尼科技大学数据科学/AI 招收2027年入学 校奖 博士生1到2名(国际和本地学生）
+1/2
-
中国科学院地球化学研究所招科研助理
+1/1
-
【2026年春季补录】厦门大学田中群院士/易骏教授纳米光子学团队招收2026年入学博士生
+1/1
2楼2010-12-28 16:32:15
3楼2010-12-28 18:15:47
或者改成求英译汉
|
It is the locus of this practice, the institution itself, that is the thing most lacking from Bowman’s analysis. The ivory tower, a solid, if lofty, metaphor for the academy, seems here to have melted into air. The matter of institutional context is absent. That disciplines are textual, that the institutional is textual, is not in doubt. There is, how-ever, a reluctance to read these texts as anything more than published scholarship. The greater fabric of the institution, of the contemporary university, the bodies, the buildings, the stuff ideas inhabit and are inscribed within, appears tangential to Bowman. His few remarks about pedagogy, specifically about teaching cultural studies, are disparaging. He mocks the notion that “teaching can consciously educate others and that these others might somehow ‘do something’ with the knowledge cultural studies has given them” (191). It is, however, these others, the student body, who usually end up leaving the “cloistered privacy of academic institutions” (125).Bowman is correct to query whether the effects of teaching can be guaranteed, but he appears to underestimate its political potential: the power of the contingent. The things that occur in lectures and seminars can “go unrecognized and are unpredictable in their effects” (McQuillan, 53), but this does not mean we should deny their possibility. Post-Marxism versus Cultural Studies teaches the reader many things. The theorization it offers of post-Marxism’s current failings, for instance, is a tour de force. It does not, however, afford enough attention to pedagogy as a textual practice of freedom, as a form of articulation and an act of intervention. It does not start to do justice to teaching. |
4楼2010-12-29 15:46:34
5楼2011-01-03 18:46:50
