| 查看: 1241 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
[交流]
英译汉已翻译，请求润色。
|
|||
|
It is the locus of this practice, the institution itself, that is the thing most lacking from Bowman’s analysis. The ivory tower, a solid, if lofty, metaphor for the academy, seems here to have melted into air. The matter of institutional context is absent. That disciplines are textual, that the institutional is textual, is not in doubt. There is, how-ever, a reluctance to read these texts as anything more than published scholarship. The greater fabric of the institution, of the contemporary university, the bodies, the buildings, the stuff ideas inhabit and are inscribed within, appears tangential to Bowman. His few remarks about pedagogy, specifically about teaching cultural studies, are disparaging. He mocks the notion that “teaching can consciously educate others and that these others might somehow ‘do something’ with the knowledge cultural studies has given them” (191). 制度本身正是这次实践的原因所在,这是鲍曼（氏）分析中最缺乏的东西。从象牙塔里走出来，一个坚固、高雅的隐喻学问，似乎在这里已经融化了到空中。体制方面的问题不存在。这学科的制度是文本，这是是毫无疑问的。有不愿读作任何事情比公布这些文本奖学金更多。对当代大学机构，建筑物，内在的思想都与鲍曼的观念看起来似乎很远。他很少评论教育学，特别是关于教学中的文化研究，这是一种蔑视。他嘲笑这个概念，即“教育教学能自觉他人，这些人可能会以某种方式来做他们的知识文化研究”(191)。 It is, however, these others, the student body, who usually end up leaving the “cloistered privacy of academic institutions” (125).Bowman is correct to query whether the effects of teaching can be guaranteed, but he appears to underestimate its political potential: the power of the contingent. The things that occur in lectures and seminars can “go unrecognized and are unpredictable in their effects” (McQuillan, 53), but this does not mean we should deny their possibility. Post-Marxism versus Cultural Studies teaches the reader many things. The theorization it offers of post-Marxism’s current failings, for instance, is a tour de force. It does not, however, afford enough attention to pedagogy as a textual practice of freedom, as a form of articulation and an act of intervention. It does not start to do justice to teaching. 学生们最终会离开“与世隔绝隐私的学术机构”(125)。鲍曼的质疑是正确的，教学的效果是否可以得到保证？但他似乎低估了其政治潜力：意外的力量。在讲座和研讨会上发生的事情有可能是“难以识别的，在他们的影响不可预测的”(麦奎伦，53)，但这并不意味着我们应该否认他们的可能性。后马克思主义与文化研究相比，交给读者许多东西。理论化的后马克思主义是当前的失败体，举例来说，它是一个绝技。但是，它没有能够承担起足够的重视，教育学作为自由的原始形式，作为衔接的一种形式和一种干预的方式。他对教学是不公平的。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
298求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
生物学308分求调剂（一志愿华东师大）做过分子实验
已经有7人回复
-
288求调剂，一志愿华南理工大学071005
已经有11人回复
-
一志愿深大085601材料工程专业（专硕）300分可以调剂去哪
已经有13人回复
-
一志愿郑州大学085600求调剂
已经有24人回复
-
327求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
327求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
材料考研求调剂总分280
已经有28人回复
-
308求调剂
已经有14人回复
-
材料专硕调剂
已经有13人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
铟锡化合物半导体材料与器件团队推介
+1/191
-
供应有机合成一整套设备，有机合成实验室常用产品。
+1/96
-
四川农业大学（211和双一流）土木学院2026年市政工程（学硕）调剂2名
+1/91
-
安徽省大别山中医药研究院 接收中药调剂生（中药、药学等10开头代码均可）
+1/77
-
西南石油大学大学土木工程招收调剂，081400土木工程，085901土木工程均有名额！
+5/60
-
招收2026级公共卫生与预防医学专业（学硕）调剂生1名
+1/43
-
延安大学化学与化工学院接收调剂生（化学、化工学硕和材料与化工专硕）
+5/40
-
武汉纺织大学学硕调剂
+2/38
-
喀什大学环境生态修复功能材料与技术团队接收2026年调剂研究生
+1/36
-
延安大学化学与化工学院接收化学专业调剂生（工科、理学均可调剂）
+5/20
-
华南师范大学光电科学与工程学院魏嵬课题组招收硕士调剂生
+1/13
-
同济大学环境学院 肖倩特聘研究员课题组 招聘硕士/博士（长期有效）
+1/10
-
南通大学-交通与土木工程学院 招调剂学生
+1/8
-
河南理工大学化学化工学院招收材料、化工类专业调剂研究生
+1/7
-
22408 360 本科六篇论文 计算机/AI交叉 数模带队两省一 AI竞赛国一
+1/6
-
齐鲁工业大学 国家重点实验室-新能源、锂离子电池、材料、化学方向
+1/5
-
齐齐哈尔大学李莉课题组诚招2026级考研调剂生（学硕和专硕）
+1/4
-
齐鲁工业大学 全国重点实验室-浙江大学衢州研究院联培-锂离子电池、材料化学方向5名
+1/4
-
大连工业大学食品交叉科学研究院招收调剂研究生
+1/2
-
武汉大学国家特聘青年教授侯绍聪课题组招收多名物理/化学/材料/电子/电气等专业博生生
+1/2
2楼2010-12-28 16:32:15
3楼2010-12-28 18:15:47
或者改成求英译汉
|
It is the locus of this practice, the institution itself, that is the thing most lacking from Bowman’s analysis. The ivory tower, a solid, if lofty, metaphor for the academy, seems here to have melted into air. The matter of institutional context is absent. That disciplines are textual, that the institutional is textual, is not in doubt. There is, how-ever, a reluctance to read these texts as anything more than published scholarship. The greater fabric of the institution, of the contemporary university, the bodies, the buildings, the stuff ideas inhabit and are inscribed within, appears tangential to Bowman. His few remarks about pedagogy, specifically about teaching cultural studies, are disparaging. He mocks the notion that “teaching can consciously educate others and that these others might somehow ‘do something’ with the knowledge cultural studies has given them” (191). It is, however, these others, the student body, who usually end up leaving the “cloistered privacy of academic institutions” (125).Bowman is correct to query whether the effects of teaching can be guaranteed, but he appears to underestimate its political potential: the power of the contingent. The things that occur in lectures and seminars can “go unrecognized and are unpredictable in their effects” (McQuillan, 53), but this does not mean we should deny their possibility. Post-Marxism versus Cultural Studies teaches the reader many things. The theorization it offers of post-Marxism’s current failings, for instance, is a tour de force. It does not, however, afford enough attention to pedagogy as a textual practice of freedom, as a form of articulation and an act of intervention. It does not start to do justice to teaching. |
4楼2010-12-29 15:46:34
5楼2011-01-03 18:46:50
