| 查看: 1215 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
[交流]
英译汉已翻译，请求润色。
|
|||
|
It is the locus of this practice, the institution itself, that is the thing most lacking from Bowman’s analysis. The ivory tower, a solid, if lofty, metaphor for the academy, seems here to have melted into air. The matter of institutional context is absent. That disciplines are textual, that the institutional is textual, is not in doubt. There is, how-ever, a reluctance to read these texts as anything more than published scholarship. The greater fabric of the institution, of the contemporary university, the bodies, the buildings, the stuff ideas inhabit and are inscribed within, appears tangential to Bowman. His few remarks about pedagogy, specifically about teaching cultural studies, are disparaging. He mocks the notion that “teaching can consciously educate others and that these others might somehow ‘do something’ with the knowledge cultural studies has given them” (191). 制度本身正是这次实践的原因所在,这是鲍曼（氏）分析中最缺乏的东西。从象牙塔里走出来，一个坚固、高雅的隐喻学问，似乎在这里已经融化了到空中。体制方面的问题不存在。这学科的制度是文本，这是是毫无疑问的。有不愿读作任何事情比公布这些文本奖学金更多。对当代大学机构，建筑物，内在的思想都与鲍曼的观念看起来似乎很远。他很少评论教育学，特别是关于教学中的文化研究，这是一种蔑视。他嘲笑这个概念，即“教育教学能自觉他人，这些人可能会以某种方式来做他们的知识文化研究”(191)。 It is, however, these others, the student body, who usually end up leaving the “cloistered privacy of academic institutions” (125).Bowman is correct to query whether the effects of teaching can be guaranteed, but he appears to underestimate its political potential: the power of the contingent. The things that occur in lectures and seminars can “go unrecognized and are unpredictable in their effects” (McQuillan, 53), but this does not mean we should deny their possibility. Post-Marxism versus Cultural Studies teaches the reader many things. The theorization it offers of post-Marxism’s current failings, for instance, is a tour de force. It does not, however, afford enough attention to pedagogy as a textual practice of freedom, as a form of articulation and an act of intervention. It does not start to do justice to teaching. 学生们最终会离开“与世隔绝隐私的学术机构”(125)。鲍曼的质疑是正确的，教学的效果是否可以得到保证？但他似乎低估了其政治潜力：意外的力量。在讲座和研讨会上发生的事情有可能是“难以识别的，在他们的影响不可预测的”(麦奎伦，53)，但这并不意味着我们应该否认他们的可能性。后马克思主义与文化研究相比，交给读者许多东西。理论化的后马克思主义是当前的失败体，举例来说，它是一个绝技。但是，它没有能够承担起足够的重视，教育学作为自由的原始形式，作为衔接的一种形式和一种干预的方式。他对教学是不公平的。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有8人回复
-
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有9人回复
-
今年春晚有几个节目很不错，点赞！
已经有10人回复
-
情人节自我反思：在爱情中有过遗憾吗？
已经有10人回复
-
基金正文30页指的是报告正文还是整个申请书
已经有5人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
山东征女友，坐标济南
+1/166
-
天津科技大学海洋与环境学院殷焕顺团队招博士生1名---分析化学领域
+1/81
-
一个陌生女人的来信
+1/59
-
代朋友发 88公务员诚征男友
+1/17
-
2026年天津科技大学“新能源催化与膜材料团队”研究生招生
+1/17
-
武汉纺织大学全国重点实验室陈嵘教授团队招收硕士研究生
+1/9
-
天津医科大学基础医学院张恒课题组博士后招聘
+1/8
-
太原理工大学集成电路学院招收2026年博士研究生
+1/8
-
招收2026年入学博士研究生
+1/8
-
南昌大学资源与环境学院刘进教授团队招收2026硕博研究生
+1/6
-
大学教授诚征结婚女友@坐标长春
+1/6
-
全奖博士 英国利物浦大学+台湾清华大学 双博士学位
+1/5
-
澳科大诚招2026年秋季硕士研究生（药物递送/生物材料方向，3月5日18:00报名截止）
+1/5
-
英国南安普顿大学禅铎课题组诚招气候动力方向博士后
+1/5
-
澳洲皇家墨尔本理工RMIT招收大模型安全/隐私PhD
+1/4
-
26申博自荐求博导-生物传感分析方向
+1/3
-
华中科技大学/武汉纺织大学联合招收博士后
+1/3
-
国家优青李洪森教授招收2026年申请考核制博士2名（无需笔试，只需面试）
+1/2
-
南京大学能源与资源学院徐加陵课题组招聘：科研助理、硕士生、博士生
+1/1
-
中国科学技术大学 工程科学学院 国家级人才团队 诚聘博士后
+1/1
2楼2010-12-28 16:32:15
3楼2010-12-28 18:15:47
或者改成求英译汉
|
It is the locus of this practice, the institution itself, that is the thing most lacking from Bowman’s analysis. The ivory tower, a solid, if lofty, metaphor for the academy, seems here to have melted into air. The matter of institutional context is absent. That disciplines are textual, that the institutional is textual, is not in doubt. There is, how-ever, a reluctance to read these texts as anything more than published scholarship. The greater fabric of the institution, of the contemporary university, the bodies, the buildings, the stuff ideas inhabit and are inscribed within, appears tangential to Bowman. His few remarks about pedagogy, specifically about teaching cultural studies, are disparaging. He mocks the notion that “teaching can consciously educate others and that these others might somehow ‘do something’ with the knowledge cultural studies has given them” (191). It is, however, these others, the student body, who usually end up leaving the “cloistered privacy of academic institutions” (125).Bowman is correct to query whether the effects of teaching can be guaranteed, but he appears to underestimate its political potential: the power of the contingent. The things that occur in lectures and seminars can “go unrecognized and are unpredictable in their effects” (McQuillan, 53), but this does not mean we should deny their possibility. Post-Marxism versus Cultural Studies teaches the reader many things. The theorization it offers of post-Marxism’s current failings, for instance, is a tour de force. It does not, however, afford enough attention to pedagogy as a textual practice of freedom, as a form of articulation and an act of intervention. It does not start to do justice to teaching. |
4楼2010-12-29 15:46:34
5楼2011-01-03 18:46:50