| 查看: 3070 | 回复: 19 | |||
[交流]
这个审稿意见能接收吗？
|
|
Ms. Ref. No.: ********* Title:**************** Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects Dear******, Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Please submit your revised manuscript in 21 days. If you need more time to complete the revisions, please let me know.\ ***** Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: *****I found the study interesting as it may lead to heat exchangers with enhanced efficiencies (see Daniel et al., Science, vol. 291, p 633 (2001)), although many points deserve to be elucidated. Finally I understand that it must be frustrating for the authors, but the English has to be comprehensively revised for a publication. A lot of expressions are awkward and sometimes the message gets confused. I would therefore recommend the publication of a comprehensively revised version of the paper. Minor details: I am not sure that the fabrication process of the surfaces sketched in figure 1 is very clear. Is Figure 3 really necessary? (maybe the supplementary information section would be more suitable). Reviewer #2: The paper "****" by **** deals with the fabrication and test of **** materials. The originality of the present work is the fabrication of the **** materials. This paper is interesting. However, major improvements have to be made to it before publication can be envisaged. I list some of them: 1. ***? 2. ****. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有5人回复
-
看板上这么多中的，有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉……
已经有3人回复
-
我不理解！
已经有23人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有10人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有10人回复
-
怎么查啊
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 俩审稿意见，一个指出语法错误，不提接收否，另一个没看懂，可以申述吗
已经有3人回复
- Opt. Lett处于 in preproduction review但是未收到审稿意见~
已经有11人回复
- 幼小的心理很难接受审稿人有点武断的意见，求建议
已经有17人回复
- 论文被拒，但编辑说按审稿人的意见修改后再重新提交还是有可能会接受
已经有25人回复
- 这样的审稿意见退休后直接接受的可能性大不？
已经有11人回复
- 会议论文同意接收后，怎么对待审稿意见？
已经有9人回复
- 三个审稿意见中有一个不赞成发表，接受的几率大吗？
已经有13人回复
- food hydrocolloids 小修，多长时间能接受，（附审稿意见）
已经有11人回复
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345452
- 帖子: 127555
- 在线: 8880.9小时
- 虫号: 971012
2楼2010-12-14 11:10:18
3楼2010-12-14 11:10:44
4楼2010-12-14 11:12:10
5楼2010-12-14 11:18:31
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345452
- 帖子: 127555
- 在线: 8880.9小时
- 虫号: 971012
6楼2010-12-14 11:20:40
7楼2010-12-14 11:22:53
8楼2010-12-14 11:22:57
9楼2010-12-14 11:27:39
10楼2010-12-14 11:30:27
11楼2010-12-14 11:46:26
12楼2010-12-14 11:47:48
13楼2010-12-14 11:52:21
14楼2010-12-14 12:00:20
15楼2010-12-14 12:07:02
16楼2010-12-14 12:22:21
17楼2010-12-14 12:36:23
18楼2010-12-14 12:37:02
19楼2010-12-14 15:29:06
20楼2010-12-14 15:29:58
投票:
