应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 交流 » 这个审稿意见能接收吗？
51/1返回列表
查看: 2080  |  回复: 19
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

kqp1982

木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 这个审稿意见能接收吗？

Ms. Ref. No.:  *********
Title:****************
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects

Dear******,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript.

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.

Please submit your revised manuscript in 21 days. If you need more time to complete the revisions, please let me know.\

*****
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects

Reviewers' comments:



Reviewer #1: *****I found the study interesting as it may lead to heat exchangers with enhanced efficiencies (see Daniel et al., Science, vol. 291, p 633 (2001)), although many points deserve to be elucidated.

Finally I understand that it must be frustrating for the authors, but the English has to be comprehensively revised for a publication. A lot of expressions are awkward and sometimes the message gets confused.
I would therefore recommend the publication of a comprehensively revised version of the paper.
Minor details:
I am not sure that the fabrication process of the surfaces sketched in figure 1 is very clear.
Is Figure 3 really necessary? (maybe the supplementary information section would be more suitable).  




Reviewer #2: The paper "****" by **** deals with the fabrication and test of  **** materials. The originality of the present work is the fabrication of the **** materials.
This paper is interesting. However, major improvements have to be made to it before publication can be envisaged. I list some of them:
1. ***?
2. ****.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼 2010-12-14 11:05:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
★ ★
kqp1982(金币+2):谢谢你 2010-12-14 11:58:51
猪会飞(金币+2):鼓励有价值的回帖交流 2010-12-14 16:19:47
引用回帖:
Originally posted by kqp1982 at 2010-12-14 11:12:10:


恩，是大修，有个问题不好回答

我投稿的时候也碰到过这样的问题。比如说我的实验不够系统，建议再补点数据什么的。由于没有实验条件，所以我的回答是，感谢审稿人的宝贵建议，研究将在以后的工作中进一步完善。有时候指出我的某个参数说法不对，因为不常用，没办法，只好找些文献来支持。只要态度诚恳，工作细致，切忌不懂装懂，一般都能接受，祝福楼主！
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
6楼2010-12-14 11:20:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 20 个回答

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
★ ★
kqp1982(金币+1):谢谢参与
猪会飞(金币+1):欢迎来投稿版交流 2010-12-14 16:19:06
引用回帖:
Originally posted by kqp1982 at 2010-12-14 11:05:27:
Ms. Ref. No.:  *********
Title:****************
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects

Dear******,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that th ...

从审稿意见来看，两位审稿专家都是倾向于发表的，只要按照要求仔细修改和认真回复就可以了。从审稿意见来看是要大修，如果时间不够的话赶紧联系编辑请求宽限时间。

[ Last edited by paperhunter on 2010-12-14 at 11:11 ]
赞一下(2人) 回复此楼
2楼2010-12-14 11:10:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kqp1982

木虫 (著名写手)
自己先顶，求助达人
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2010-12-14 11:10:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kqp1982

木虫 (著名写手)
引用回帖:
Originally posted by paperhunter at 2010-12-14 11:10:18:

从审稿意见来看，两位审稿专家都是倾向于发表的，只要按照要求仔细修改和认真回复就可以了。从审稿意见来看是要大修，如果时间不够的话赶紧联系编辑请求宽限时间。

[ Last edited by paperhunter on 2010-1 ...

恩，是大修，有个问题不好回答
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2010-12-14 11:12:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 20 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭