| 查看: 1392 | 回复: 8 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
[交流]
求助一段英语翻译
|
|||
|
A previous cLC method, involving large injection volumes (20 μL) and on-column focusing techniques, provided a suitable sensitivity using an Inertsil? C8 capillary column, DAD and gradient elution. This method showed that composition of the focusing solution, mobile phase and pH have remarkable effects on HA separation. In order to improve this separation, an isocratic cLC method compatible with MS detection was developed and the influence of several chromatographic factors on separation quality evaluated. Different reversed-phase packings such as Luna? C8, Luna? C18, Synergi? Max-RP (C12) and Synergi Fusion (C18 and polar embedded group) were tested using UV-DAD detection. These columns were chosen due to their high efficiencies and bonded phase surface coverage. Considering the different particle sizes, flow rate was set at 15 μL min?1 for both Synergi Fusion? and Synergi? Max-RP, 12 and 9 μL min?1 for Luna? C8 and Luna? C18 columns respectively. Chromatographic conditions were optimized using experimental design methodologies such as central composite design. Factors and ranges selected for the optimization of mobile phase composition were ACN (11.6–28.4%), ammonium acetate concentration (13.2–46.8 mM) and buffer pH (3.6–4.4). Response variables were expressed in terms of resolution, calculated at baseline, between the worst resolved peak pair NH–H (Rs,min), and retention time of the last eluting peak (tend). From the obtained equations, it could be concluded that Rs,min was significantly affected by both ACN percentage and pH while tend only by ACN. In addition, the ammonium acetate concentration had no significant effect on separation. Chromatographic separation efficiency was optimized for Rs,min ≥ 2 and minimum tend value. Luna? C8 capillary column provided poor resolution. Luna? C18 and Synergi? Max-RP columns provided similar Rs,min to Synergi? Fusion but higher efficiencies. However, Synergi? Max-RP column provided poor peak symmetry. Therefore, Luna? C18 column was selected for further optimization with the quadrupole MS detector. Taking into account the instrumental limitations of the MS capillary nebulizer, the ammonium acetate concentration in the mobile phase was fixed to 5 mM. Chromatographic separation was optimized using multifactorial design. Factors and ranges selected were ACN (12–18%) and pH (3.6–4.1). For the injection, buffered focusing solutions with 5% MeOH were used. Table 1 includes the values of the experimental responses (Rs,min and tend), which were fitted into the following normalized polynomial equations: (1)Rs,min=1.74?0.51pH?1.35ACN?0.06pH2+0.39pH ACN+0.40ACN2 (2)tend=12.18+0.18pH?11.02ACN+0.76pH2?0.94pH ACN+4.83 ACN2 Determination coefficients were 0.988 and 0.992 for Rs,min and tend respectively, showing the reliability of the equations. In the studied domain, both ACN percentage and pH affected significantly to Rs,min (p values 0.0000 and 0.0002 respectively) (Eq. (1)) while ACN (%) affected only tend (p value 0.0000 and 0.0005 for the single and quadratic term respectively) (Eq. (2)). As can be expected, the interactions between factors (ACN-pH) were significant only for Rs,min response (p = 0.0033). In Fig. 1 it can be observed that the ACN percentage decrease in the mobile phase increases Rs,min and tend. However, when pH decreases, Rs,min increases and tend does not change significantly. The chromatographic separation efficiency was optimized by maximizing Rs,min and minimizing tend values which maximized the desirability function over the selected region. The maximum desirability function yielded a tend = 13.6 min and Rs,min = 2.2 at pH 3.6 and 14.5% ACN. The estimated response surfaces predicted that Rs,min > 2 and tend in the range 12.5–15.0 min could be obtained at pH 3.6–3.7 and 13–15% ACN. As a compromise, pH 3.6 and 13% ACN were selected as optimum values. Under these conditions tend = 15.0 min and Rs,min = 2.3 were expected and experimentally assessed. Finally, ammonium formate 5 mM was also tested and selected to avoid problems into the capillary MS nebulizer. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料调剂
已经有4人回复
-
面上模板改不了页边距吧？
已经有6人回复
-
307求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
317一志愿华南理工电气工程求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
272求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
化工专硕348，一志愿985求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
292求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
290求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
295求调剂
已经有5人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
单曲循环久了很多都会变
+1/396
-
寻找那个能让“稳定生活”变得“更有趣”的你
+1/154
-
坐标广州，征女友
+2/136
-
【最后机会】深圳大学26级土木工程博士急招
+5/95
-
【全奖博士招生】美国科罗拉多大学科罗拉多斯普林斯分校----固体与结构力学
+1/83
-
长春工业大学化学工程学院招收26年硕士调剂生
+1/80
-
【最后机会】深圳大学2026级土木工程博士急招
+5/70
-
26国自然面上，大家是否还写研究方案？
+1/70
-
南通大学生物医药方向国家级人才团队招聘教师
+3/56
-
博洛尼亚大学能源材料课题组2个博后位置招聘（PNRR & MSCA）
+1/52
-
大连工业大学杰青/长江团队招收储能电池方向博士
+1/38
-
湖南大学材料科学与工程学院招收博士研究生
+1/36
-
现在科研环境这么差，我想这样试试
+1/32
-
中山大学公卫学院招收2026年4月申请-考核制的博士生补录取（化学生物学、蛋白质组学）
+3/28
-
211大学【2026学博】补招
+1/27
-
南京林业大学化工院勇强/赖晨欢教授团队招收申请考核制博士1名
+1/26
-
“教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划”入选团队招收材料，化学与化工博士研究生
+1/13
-
加拿大卡尔顿大学【招博后】【心理学人工智能】
+1/12
-
26届计算机、电子信息类、电科、控制、通信考研T j信息pp骏：74+08+76+6+20/
+1/4
-
大连理工大学 蒋孟男课题组（国家级高层次青年人才）诚招博士后/科研助理
+1/1
2楼2010-12-03 00:41:36
3楼2010-12-03 18:43:09
4楼2010-12-04 14:47:24
5楼2010-12-07 16:12:49
6楼2010-12-07 16:14:54
7楼2010-12-07 17:28:31
★ ★
ringzhu(金币-2):本版严禁机器翻译。。。。 2010-12-08 13:07:33
zxc578642(金币+35, 翻译EPI+1): 2010-12-11 00:08:34
ringzhu(金币-2):本版严禁机器翻译。。。。 2010-12-08 13:07:33
zxc578642(金币+35, 翻译EPI+1): 2010-12-11 00:08:34
|
先前的分类号方法，涉及到大注射量（20μL）和柱上聚焦技术，提供了合适的灵敏度使用Inertsil？ C8的毛细管柱，爸爸和梯度洗脱。这种方法表明，聚焦解决方案，流动相组成和pH值对医管局分离成效显着。为了改善这种分离，一等度分类号兼容MS检测法的开发和几种因素对色谱分离质量的影响进行评估。 不同的反相填料，如Luna？ C8的，Luna？ C18时，Synergi？马克斯反相（十二）和Synergi融合（C18和极性嵌入组）进行了测试使用紫外二极管阵列检测。这些列被选为由于其高效率和键合相表面覆盖。考虑到不同颗粒大小，流量率定为15微升分钟？Synergi融合为1？和Synergi？马克斯余段，12分钟和第9微升？负责卢纳1？ C8和卢娜？ C18柱分别。 色谱条件进行了优化，采用中心组合设计，如实验设计方法。因素和流动相组成的优化选择范围为乙腈（11.6-28.4％），醋酸铵浓度（13.2-46.8毫米）和缓冲液pH值（3.6-4.4）。响应变量中表达了在基准计算的决议而言，最糟糕的解决高峰之间的配对的NH -的H（卢比，分钟），并保留最后洗脱峰（倾向）的时间。从得到的方程，可以得出结论，卢比，最小显着比例都乙腈和pH的影响，而往往只乙腈。此外，醋酸铵浓度无显着影响的分离。 色谱分离效率进行优化卢比，≥2分和最低倾向于价值。卢纳？ C8的毛细管柱提供的分辨率较低。卢纳？ C18和Synergi？马克斯反相柱提供了类似的卢比，分钟，以Synergi？融合，但更高的效率。然而，Synergi？马克斯穷人提供的反相柱峰的对称性。因此，卢娜？ C18柱被选定为四极杆质谱检测器的进一步优化。 考虑到MS的毛细管雾化器的工具的限制，在流动相中醋酸铵浓度为5毫米。色谱分离采用多因素进行了优化设计。被选定的因素和范围乙腈（12-18％）和pH值（3.6-4.1）。对于注射液，缓冲聚焦5％甲醇被用来解决方案。 表1包括对实验的反应值（卢比，min和靠拢），分为以下规范化多项式拟合方程： （1）卢比，最小= 1.74？0.51pH？1.35ACN？0.06pH2 0.39 pH值乙腈+0.40 ACN2 （2）= 12.18 +0.18 pH值趋向？11.02ACN 0.76 pH值为2？0.94pH乙腈4.83 ACN2 决定系数分别为卢比，最小为0.988和0.992，往往分别显示了该方程的可靠性。在所研究的领域，都乙腈率和pH值的影响显着卢比，分（P值分别为0.0000和0.0002）（式（1）），而乙腈（％）仅影响往往（P值0.0000和0.0005为单和二次任期分别）（式（2））。正如可以预料，因素之间（乙腈- pH值）有显着的相互作用只有卢比，最小反应（P = 0.0033）。在图。 1可以观察到，在增加流动相乙腈比例下降卢比，min和趋向。然而，当pH值降低，卢比，最小升幅，而且往往没有明显变化。 色谱分离效率的最大化卢比，min和价值观趋于优化，最大限度地减少对选定的区域最大化的可取性功能。最大的可取性功能产生了往往和Rs = 13.6分，3.6分，在pH = 2.2和14.5％乙腈。估计响应面预测，遥感，分“2和范围12.5-15.0分钟往往可以在pH值3.6-3.7和13-15％乙腈获得。作为一种妥协，pH值3.6和13％乙腈被选定为最佳值。在这种情况往往和Rs = 15.0分钟，2.3分=预期和实验评估。最后，甲酸铵5毫米进行了试验，并选择了避免陷入毛细管质谱雾化器的问题。 |
8楼2010-12-08 10:42:12
9楼2010-12-14 21:32:45
