| 查看: 1099 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
审稿意见返回,大家帮看看还有接受的可能吗? 已有6人参与
|
|||
|
We regret to advise you that your manuscript has not been accepted for publication in Optics Express. The reviewer comments are included below. Reviewer 1 > > > > This article has many deficiencies. A few of them are > > listed above. This article can not be published in Optics > > Express. > > > > - English usage > > - lack of important references > > - confusion between y-axis and z-axis (in Fig. 1, for > > instance) > > - confusion in the geometrical parameters : the period is > > 'Lambda' in section 2 and in the beginning of section 3, 'T' > > in the following (eq. (9)), and 'd' in the description of > > the Fabry-Perot-like model. > > - the description of RCWA method is well known and useless > > - the parameters of the Drude model for silver are not > > given > > > > Even more importantly, I believe that the definition of the > > wave-vector kz of the Fabry-Perot model is wrong (page 6). 重看了自己的论文,果然犯了最后一条意见的错误, 如果根据意见重改, OE接受的可能有多大? |
» 猜你喜欢
磺酰氟产物,毕不了业了!
已经有4人回复
论文终于录用啦!满足毕业条件了
已经有16人回复
求个博导看看
已经有19人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志(返修),总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
帮忙看看审稿意见(有关氢键键能)
已经有7人回复
急,请大家帮忙看看这个审稿意见,困惑.......
已经有13人回复
SCI审稿意见回来了,编辑给的moderate revision,麻烦大家帮分析一下,有BB
已经有28人回复
帮忙看看这个审稿意见是什么意思
已经有4人回复
【求助】有劳虫友高手帮忙看看acs审稿意见,多谢!
已经有5人回复
投稿有答复了,些许激动请大家帮忙看看,谢谢大家!(在13楼增加第二封审稿意见)
已经有32人回复
审稿人给的意见 有点看不懂。帮帮忙 谢谢
已经有9人回复
投了一篇文章,审稿结果是“major revision”,帮忙看看评审意见,有戏没?
已经有32人回复
【求助】麻烦帮忙看看我的审稿意见怎么回复啊,关于SEI膜
已经有13人回复
文章的审稿意见,大家帮忙看看!
已经有6人回复
请大家帮忙看看如何回复审稿意见
已经有4人回复
帮忙看看如何回复审稿人意见,急!!!
已经有5人回复
6楼2010-11-23 22:51:21







回复此楼