| 查看: 5573 | 回复: 76 | |||
| 本帖产生 4 个 ESEPI ,点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
xia_chong金虫 (文坛精英)
|
[交流]
【Discussion】Do you approve animal experiments?
|
||
[ Last edited by xuanxuankaoyan on 2010-10-31 at 16:43 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧?
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的?
已经有18人回复
国自然评审意见
已经有15人回复
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有13人回复
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有14人回复
系统查不到
已经有11人回复

michael_ye
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 254.7
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 180
- 在线: 74.2小时
- 虫号: 3347542
- 注册: 2014-07-31
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 计算机体系结构
77楼2014-09-19 15:24:31
xia_chong
金虫 (文坛精英)
- ESEPI: 43
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.591
- 金币: 10270.8
- 散金: 2377
- 红花: 34
- 沙发: 160
- 帖子: 12455
- 在线: 1941.8小时
- 虫号: 804303
- 注册: 2009-07-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 粒子物理学和场论
- 管辖: English Cafe

4楼2010-10-31 16:32:05
xuanxuankaoyan
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- ESEPI: 39
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.302
- 金币: 10726.6
- 散金: 4772
- 红花: 21
- 沙发: 39
- 帖子: 7428
- 在线: 1088.3小时
- 虫号: 509186
- 注册: 2008-02-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 植物学
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
fangye0413(金币+5, ESEPI+1):yeah,even some merciless,but needed~ 2010-10-31 17:49:52
fangye0413(金币+5, ESEPI+1):yeah,even some merciless,but needed~ 2010-10-31 17:49:52
|
i approve and the reason could be listed as follows: 1.Animals suffer great pain when being tested. that is right. but it deserves. Does that mean that we drop the chance to test animals whereas choose a human beings directly instead? however our human beings suffer great pain as well when we are sick. we can use a large variety of natural resources to develop our knowledge to the unknown world, and eventurally make great contribution to a better understanding of the relationship between our human beings and animals. 2.Animals live unfreely before they are tested. that is also the truth. ok, we free them, and let them do whatever they like to do. What a consequence can you imagin if this happen? it is surely coming to a hug mess, and even can not help us explore the real interest into it. Besides if done like this, it is difficult to explain the treatment variation, and hard to find the reason. 3. Animals would die in most cases. That is belonging to the part of the truth. If possible, I hope this could be assessed right if only it does not matter to the surroundings interruption. Whereas it is really dangerous to release them to be free or to be recycled. Maybe its death could rightly explain how can be safe to these animals when put into the situation similiar to the test, or make it clear that to what extent that we can control them when they come to an extremly dangerous level. [ Last edited by xuanxuankaoyan on 2010-10-31 at 17:30 ] |
5楼2010-10-31 17:22:46
fangye0413
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
快乐家族之水
- ESEPI: 19
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 2.05
- 金币: 13450.6
- 散金: 11919
- 红花: 94
- 沙发: 137
- 帖子: 27945
- 在线: 1588.4小时
- 虫号: 820756
- 注册: 2009-08-03
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: English Cafe

6楼2010-10-31 18:04:06














回复此楼
投票:
30