| 查看: 4976 | 回复: 76 | ||||
| 本帖产生 4 个 ESEPI ,点击这里进行查看 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
xia_chong兑换贵宾
|
[交流]
【Discussion】Do you approve animal experiments?
|
|||
[ Last edited by xuanxuankaoyan on 2010-10-31 at 16:43 ] |
» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
EC~cabbage and radish soup |
» 猜你喜欢
生物学308分求调剂(一志愿华东师大)
已经有3人回复
求调剂:一志愿:南京大学 专业:0705 总分320 ,本科985,四六级已过
已经有3人回复
环境工程 085701,267求调剂
已经有14人回复
308求调剂
已经有12人回复
求调剂:085600材料与化工,考材科基,总分319
已经有21人回复
311求调剂
已经有8人回复
294分080500材料科学与工程求调剂
已经有13人回复
288求调剂 一志愿哈工大 材料与化工
已经有19人回复
288资源与环境专硕求调剂,不限专业,有学上就行
已经有23人回复
一志愿085600中科院宁波所276分求调剂
已经有17人回复

fangye0413
新虫
快乐家族之水
- ESEPI: 19
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 2.05
- 金币: 13450.6
- 散金: 11919
- 红花: 94
- 沙发: 137
- 帖子: 27945
- 在线: 1588.4小时
- 虫号: 820756
- 注册: 2009-08-03
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: English Cafe

6楼2010-10-31 18:04:06
xia_chong
管理员
- ESEPI: 43
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.591
- 金币: 10270.8
- 散金: 2377
- 红花: 34
- 沙发: 160
- 帖子: 12455
- 在线: 1941.8小时
- 虫号: 804303
- 注册: 2009-07-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 粒子物理学和场论
- 管辖: English Cafe

4楼2010-10-31 16:32:05
xuanxuankaoyan
主管区长
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- ESEPI: 39
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.302
- 金币: 10726.6
- 散金: 4772
- 红花: 21
- 沙发: 39
- 帖子: 7428
- 在线: 1088.3小时
- 虫号: 509186
- 注册: 2008-02-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 植物学
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
fangye0413(金币+5, ESEPI+1):yeah,even some merciless,but needed~ 2010-10-31 17:49:52
fangye0413(金币+5, ESEPI+1):yeah,even some merciless,but needed~ 2010-10-31 17:49:52
|
i approve and the reason could be listed as follows: 1.Animals suffer great pain when being tested. that is right. but it deserves. Does that mean that we drop the chance to test animals whereas choose a human beings directly instead? however our human beings suffer great pain as well when we are sick. we can use a large variety of natural resources to develop our knowledge to the unknown world, and eventurally make great contribution to a better understanding of the relationship between our human beings and animals. 2.Animals live unfreely before they are tested. that is also the truth. ok, we free them, and let them do whatever they like to do. What a consequence can you imagin if this happen? it is surely coming to a hug mess, and even can not help us explore the real interest into it. Besides if done like this, it is difficult to explain the treatment variation, and hard to find the reason. 3. Animals would die in most cases. That is belonging to the part of the truth. If possible, I hope this could be assessed right if only it does not matter to the surroundings interruption. Whereas it is really dangerous to release them to be free or to be recycled. Maybe its death could rightly explain how can be safe to these animals when put into the situation similiar to the test, or make it clear that to what extent that we can control them when they come to an extremly dangerous level. [ Last edited by xuanxuankaoyan on 2010-10-31 at 17:30 ] |
5楼2010-10-31 17:22:46
小泉他爹
专家顾问
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1615.6
- 散金: 20
- 沙发: 5
- 帖子: 833
- 在线: 30.3小时
- 虫号: 1059554
- 注册: 2010-07-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机合成
7楼2010-10-31 19:07:43



















回复此楼
10