| ²é¿´: 4896 | »Ø¸´: 76 | ||||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 4 ¸ö ESEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | ||||
xia_chong½ð³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
|
[½»Á÷]
¡¾Discussion¡¿Do you approve animal experiments?
|
|||
[ Last edited by xuanxuankaoyan on 2010-10-31 at 16:43 ] |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
EC~cabbage and radish soup |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
0703»¯Ñ§/290Çóµ÷¼Á/±¾¿Æ¾Àú·á¸»/¹¤¿ÆÒ²¿É
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
284Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì085602 305·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
¿¼Ñе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
292Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ Î÷±±´óѧ ×Ü·Ö282 Ó¢ÓïÒ»62 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
315·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
»·¾³×¨Ë¶324·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁÍÆ¼ö
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ѰÕÒµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
291 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´

plum8736
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
¿ìÀÖ¼Ò×å--¿Æ±ÈµÄżÏñ
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.009
- ½ð±Ò: 6122.4
- É¢½ð: 105
- ºì»¨: 2
- ɳ·¢: 15
- Ìû×Ó: 4025
- ÔÚÏß: 297.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 576849
- ×¢²á: 2008-06-21
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ӻϳɻ¯Ñ§
¡ï ¡ï
xia_chong(½ð±Ò+2):Thanks for your opinion! Sometimes, some scientists do animal experiments for personal ideas, which might not be related to human's nature. That's not what we want. 2010-11-16 18:07:34
xia_chong(½ð±Ò+2):Thanks for your opinion! Sometimes, some scientists do animal experiments for personal ideas, which might not be related to human's nature. That's not what we want. 2010-11-16 18:07:34
|
I approve! plz answer my question first: do u like eating meats? Before we eat them, we have to kill them... And it is natural rule, experiment is just like a totally different way we kill and "eat" them, we r in the food chain. Yes, some animals r cute and lovely, like piglet. But we have to do the nature forces us to do. |
44Â¥2010-11-16 17:45:56
·ÉµÄÖí
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
Öí¼Ò×塪¡ª·ÉµÄÖí
- ESEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.265
- ½ð±Ò: 9534.7
- É¢½ð: 1075
- ºì»¨: 15
- ɳ·¢: 911
- Ìû×Ó: 19560
- ÔÚÏß: 842.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1020793
- ×¢²á: 2010-05-17
- רҵ: ÉúÎïÎïÀí»¯Ñ§

2Â¥2010-10-31 16:30:02
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.2):ÇÀÁ˸öС°åµÊ£¬¸ø¸öºì°ü
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.2):ÇÀÁ˸öС°åµÊ£¬¸ø¸öºì°ü
|
3Â¥2010-10-31 16:31:08
xia_chong
½ð³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- ESEPI: 43
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.591
- ½ð±Ò: 10270.8
- É¢½ð: 2377
- ºì»¨: 34
- ɳ·¢: 160
- Ìû×Ó: 12455
- ÔÚÏß: 1941.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 804303
- ×¢²á: 2009-07-06
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Á£×ÓÎïÀíѧºÍ³¡ÂÛ
- ¹ÜϽ: English Cafe

4Â¥2010-10-31 16:32:05
xuanxuankaoyan
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- ESEPI: 39
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.302
- ½ð±Ò: 10726.6
- É¢½ð: 4772
- ºì»¨: 21
- ɳ·¢: 39
- Ìû×Ó: 7428
- ÔÚÏß: 1088.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 509186
- ×¢²á: 2008-02-22
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ö²Îïѧ
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
fangye0413(½ð±Ò+5, ESEPI+1):yeah,even some merciless,but needed~ 2010-10-31 17:49:52
fangye0413(½ð±Ò+5, ESEPI+1):yeah,even some merciless,but needed~ 2010-10-31 17:49:52
|
i approve and the reason could be listed as follows: 1.Animals suffer great pain when being tested. that is right. but it deserves. Does that mean that we drop the chance to test animals whereas choose a human beings directly instead? however our human beings suffer great pain as well when we are sick. we can use a large variety of natural resources to develop our knowledge to the unknown world, and eventurally make great contribution to a better understanding of the relationship between our human beings and animals. 2.Animals live unfreely before they are tested. that is also the truth. ok, we free them, and let them do whatever they like to do. What a consequence can you imagin if this happen? it is surely coming to a hug mess, and even can not help us explore the real interest into it. Besides if done like this, it is difficult to explain the treatment variation, and hard to find the reason. 3. Animals would die in most cases. That is belonging to the part of the truth. If possible, I hope this could be assessed right if only it does not matter to the surroundings interruption. Whereas it is really dangerous to release them to be free or to be recycled. Maybe its death could rightly explain how can be safe to these animals when put into the situation similiar to the test, or make it clear that to what extent that we can control them when they come to an extremly dangerous level. [ Last edited by xuanxuankaoyan on 2010-10-31 at 17:30 ] |
5Â¥2010-10-31 17:22:46
fangye0413
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
¿ìÀÖ¼Ò×å֮ˮ
- ESEPI: 19
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 2.05
- ½ð±Ò: 13450.6
- É¢½ð: 11919
- ºì»¨: 94
- ɳ·¢: 137
- Ìû×Ó: 27945
- ÔÚÏß: 1588.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 820756
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-03
- רҵ: »·¾³¹¤³Ì
- ¹ÜϽ: English Cafe

6Â¥2010-10-31 18:04:06
СȪËûµù
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1615.6
- É¢½ð: 20
- ɳ·¢: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 833
- ÔÚÏß: 30.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1059554
- ×¢²á: 2010-07-17
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÓлúºÏ³É
xuanxuankaoyan:approval or rejection? I can't find the answer. 2010-11-01 19:16:54
| Yes, they are meaningful for humans. |
7Â¥2010-10-31 19:07:43
coolucker
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
Сľ³æ¸ç¸ç
- Ó¦Öú: 5 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.049
- ½ð±Ò: 3114.3
- É¢½ð: 540
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 2521
- ÔÚÏß: 347.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 722147
- ×¢²á: 2009-03-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÓлúºÏ³É
¡ï
xia_chong(½ð±Ò+1):Yes, but it is very hard to find a good replacement. 2010-11-01 08:39:45
xia_chong(½ð±Ò+1):Yes, but it is very hard to find a good replacement. 2010-11-01 08:39:45
|
To some extent, It a good way for our research. On the other hand, we should develope more state-of-the-art methods to replace animal experiments. |

8Â¥2010-10-31 23:57:48
coolucker
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
Сľ³æ¸ç¸ç
- Ó¦Öú: 5 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.049
- ½ð±Ò: 3114.3
- É¢½ð: 540
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 2521
- ÔÚÏß: 347.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 722147
- ×¢²á: 2009-03-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÓлúºÏ³É

9Â¥2010-10-31 23:59:32
2006jinfj
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
´óÊ¥
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 5100.8
- É¢½ð: 8
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 1007
- ÔÚÏß: 318.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 409999
- ×¢²á: 2007-06-22
- רҵ: ÎÞ»ú·Ç½ðÊô²ÄÁÏ
see
¡ï
xuanxuankaoyan(½ð±Ò+1):if you have to make a choice, which would you take? 2010-11-01 09:54:51
xuanxuankaoyan(½ð±Ò+1):if you have to make a choice, which would you take? 2010-11-01 09:54:51
It is hard to simply approve or reject these experiments.![]() |

10Â¥2010-11-01 08:45:57


















»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
see~~~
6