| 查看: 4974 | 回复: 76 | |||
| 本帖产生 4 个 ESEPI ,点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
xia_chong金虫 (文坛精英)
|
[交流]
【Discussion】Do you approve animal experiments?
|
||
[ Last edited by xuanxuankaoyan on 2010-10-31 at 16:43 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
生物学296求调剂
已经有10人回复
288资源与环境专硕求调剂,不限专业,有学上就行
已经有19人回复
086000生物与医药 初试274求调剂
已经有4人回复
315求调剂
已经有7人回复
288求调剂 一志愿哈工大 材料与化工
已经有11人回复
求调剂
已经有9人回复
309求调剂
已经有16人回复
322求调剂:一志愿湖南大学 材料与化工(085600),已过六级。
已经有10人回复
330分求调剂
已经有6人回复
317求调剂
已经有13人回复

plum8736
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
快乐家族--科比的偶像
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.009
- 金币: 6122.4
- 散金: 105
- 红花: 2
- 沙发: 15
- 帖子: 4025
- 在线: 297.9小时
- 虫号: 576849
- 注册: 2008-06-21
- 专业: 高分子合成化学
★ ★
xia_chong(金币+2):Thanks for your opinion! Sometimes, some scientists do animal experiments for personal ideas, which might not be related to human's nature. That's not what we want. 2010-11-16 18:07:34
xia_chong(金币+2):Thanks for your opinion! Sometimes, some scientists do animal experiments for personal ideas, which might not be related to human's nature. That's not what we want. 2010-11-16 18:07:34
|
I approve! plz answer my question first: do u like eating meats? Before we eat them, we have to kill them... And it is natural rule, experiment is just like a totally different way we kill and "eat" them, we r in the food chain. Yes, some animals r cute and lovely, like piglet. But we have to do the nature forces us to do. |
44楼2010-11-16 17:45:56
xia_chong
金虫 (文坛精英)
- ESEPI: 43
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.591
- 金币: 10270.8
- 散金: 2377
- 红花: 34
- 沙发: 160
- 帖子: 12455
- 在线: 1941.8小时
- 虫号: 804303
- 注册: 2009-07-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 粒子物理学和场论
- 管辖: English Cafe

4楼2010-10-31 16:32:05
xuanxuankaoyan
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- ESEPI: 39
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.302
- 金币: 10726.6
- 散金: 4772
- 红花: 21
- 沙发: 39
- 帖子: 7428
- 在线: 1088.3小时
- 虫号: 509186
- 注册: 2008-02-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 植物学
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
fangye0413(金币+5, ESEPI+1):yeah,even some merciless,but needed~ 2010-10-31 17:49:52
fangye0413(金币+5, ESEPI+1):yeah,even some merciless,but needed~ 2010-10-31 17:49:52
|
i approve and the reason could be listed as follows: 1.Animals suffer great pain when being tested. that is right. but it deserves. Does that mean that we drop the chance to test animals whereas choose a human beings directly instead? however our human beings suffer great pain as well when we are sick. we can use a large variety of natural resources to develop our knowledge to the unknown world, and eventurally make great contribution to a better understanding of the relationship between our human beings and animals. 2.Animals live unfreely before they are tested. that is also the truth. ok, we free them, and let them do whatever they like to do. What a consequence can you imagin if this happen? it is surely coming to a hug mess, and even can not help us explore the real interest into it. Besides if done like this, it is difficult to explain the treatment variation, and hard to find the reason. 3. Animals would die in most cases. That is belonging to the part of the truth. If possible, I hope this could be assessed right if only it does not matter to the surroundings interruption. Whereas it is really dangerous to release them to be free or to be recycled. Maybe its death could rightly explain how can be safe to these animals when put into the situation similiar to the test, or make it clear that to what extent that we can control them when they come to an extremly dangerous level. [ Last edited by xuanxuankaoyan on 2010-10-31 at 17:30 ] |
5楼2010-10-31 17:22:46
fangye0413
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
快乐家族之水
- ESEPI: 19
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 2.05
- 金币: 13450.6
- 散金: 11919
- 红花: 94
- 沙发: 137
- 帖子: 27945
- 在线: 1588.4小时
- 虫号: 820756
- 注册: 2009-08-03
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: English Cafe

6楼2010-10-31 18:04:06



















回复此楼