| 查看: 3147 | 回复: 11 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
fuhuo木虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
Materials and Design技术审查意见 已有1人参与
|
||
|
本人第一次投递英文文章，有好多不清楚，这是技术审查后的结果： Thank you for submitting your work to Materials and Design. Before we pass on manuscripts to the Journal Editor, who is responsible for the scientific assessment, we perform an initial check against formal technical criteria (structure of submission, adherence to the Guide for Authors and English language usage). We regret to inform you that your manuscript does not meet the journal's required standard. Please make changes/corrections as detailed in the comments below. When you resubmit your manuscript, please also provide a separate sheet listing your responses to the problems that were raised and upload it under the submission item 'Responses to Technical Check Results'. A sample of the "Responses" sheet can be found at: http://www.elsevierscitech.com/l ... Technical_Check.pdf We regret that without a completed "Responses" sheet, your manuscript will not be further processed. Before resubmitting your manuscript, please make sure that every aspect of the manuscript is in accordance with the Guide for Authors which is available at http://ees.elsevier.com/jmad/ top of screen. PLEASE NOTE: Resubmission is not a guarantee that your submission will subsequently proceed to the peer review process, which is a decision to be made at the sole discretion of the journal editor. Yours sincerely, Helen Whyte Journal Manager Materials and Design Comments: 1) A maximum of 3 keywords should be selected from the list of "Keywords for Indexing" which is printed in each journal issue and also available on the journal homepage. And each keyword should be accompanied by the capital letter denoting the category from which the keyword has been selected. 2) Please note, Research Highlights must be formatted as follows: - a list containing 3-5 bullet points - with a maximum of 85 characters per bullet point, including spaces. ********************************************************************************************************************** 是不是Comments中这两点不符合要求，要求文中的关键词要在期刊要求的里面选几个。这封信中没有提到英语问题，是不是说英文没有问题？ Dear editor, Thank you for your useful comments and suggestions on the language and the structure of our manuscript. We have modified the manuscript accordingly, and the detailed corrections are listed below point by point: 1) In its current state, the level of English throughout your manuscript does not meet the journal's required standard. Authors have the responsibility to present their papers in good English which can be understood by the journal's readership. We revised the WHOLE manuscript carefully to avoid language errors. In addition, we asked several colleagues who are skilled authors to check the English. We believe that the language is now acceptable for the review process. 2) Please note that your abstract (250 words) exceeds the maximum length of 150 words for research article. The abstract has been revised and the word count is now 149. 3) Figures should be cited sequentially in the text. Fig. 6 is provided, but not cited; please check and revise accordingly. Now all figures are provided and cited sequentially in the text. 4) The cover letter provided should include the following: the manuscript has not been previously published, is not currently submitted for review to any other journal, and will not be submitted elsewhere before one decision is made. The required information has been included in the cover letter. 5) Type the whole manuscript with uniform lettering and sizing, and with double line spacing, including references, figure captions and tables. We have typed the whole manuscript in uniform lettering and sizing, and with double line spacing. 6) Please note that the reference list must conform strictly to the Guide for Authors. Journal names should be abbreviated and page span should be provided. We have checked all the references and formatted them strictly according to the Guide for Authors. Especially the journal names have been abbreviated and page span provided. 这是后来生成的一个PDF，这6点的要后，都以恢复，且回复前都有一个对号，是不是说明这6点没有问题。 从这两封信看来，论文在技术审查环节就是2点小错误吗？？？希望高给与指点一下！！！谢谢大家。。。。。。。。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
梦想
已经有7人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有4人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有8人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有15人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有6人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有11人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- materials and design审稿人同意，编辑拒稿概率多大？
已经有8人回复
- materials sciences and engineering B 技术审查编页码求助
已经有3人回复
- Materials and Corrosion给小修，有个审稿意见没看懂，望高手们帮忙？
已经有3人回复
- 悲剧啊！技术审查都没有过关，还说我英语水平很烂
已经有10人回复
- Materials and Design修改后再审的意见
已经有5人回复
- Materials science and engineering A 技术审查问题
已经有8人回复
- Materials and Design的技术审查
已经有24人回复
- Materials Letters 技术审查通过后的状态是不是 Editor Invited.
已经有13人回复
- Materials Science & Engineering A投稿的技术审查
已经有7人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- Materials letters投稿技术审查结果求助
已经有30人回复
- Materials and Design 审稿人没意见 编辑让加括号 至今With Editor
已经有7人回复
- 投过Materials Letters的虫友，求助技术审查的修改！
已经有16人回复
删除广告
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
mandolin(金币-5): 2010-10-23 19:30:19
mandolin:编辑内容 2010-10-23 19:30
mandolin(金币-5): 2010-10-23 19:30:19
mandolin:编辑内容 2010-10-23 19:30
| [ Last edited by mandolin on 2010-10-23 at 19:30 ] |
8楼2010-10-23 10:18:31
2楼2010-10-21 10:16:57
yangfangwi
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 760.4
- 散金: 106
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 331
- 在线: 36.1小时
- 虫号: 742673
- 注册: 2009-04-07
- 专业: 金属结构材料
3楼2010-10-22 11:44:31
fuhuo
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1663.6
- 散金: 7
- 帖子: 162
- 在线: 18.8小时
- 虫号: 708853
- 注册: 2009-02-25
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子合成化学
4楼2010-10-22 21:36:01
5
投票:
