24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1446  |  回复: 13
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

carno

木虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 国外评阅人的回复,各位牛人帮忙小弟看看,还有戏不?已有11人参与

This manuscript, as-written, is not yet ready for IJMP. The subject matter is suitable, though it is much better suited to a journal such as Hydrometallurgy. The manuscript is full of grammatical errors to the point of being very distracting to the reader. I made corrections in the initial part just to highlight the type of changes that authors must make. It would be best if the authors seek professional service for fixing the English.
Also this manuscript does not appear to be a full length research paper. It is at best a Technical Note. Lee et al (2005) used dithionite. And the current authors used thiosulfate. So this is nothing revolutionary. The authors have not articulated the novelty of their work. Is thiosulfate better than dithionite? What are the advantages of thiosulfate?
My recommendation is that the authors should thoroughly revise the manuscript and submit it as a technical note.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hunter666

银虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
语言有问题,文章没创新性,不够research article 的深度,他建议修改好后投technical note。
DEFAULT!
5楼2010-07-20 11:02:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 carno 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见