24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

eseayl

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

应助: 29 (小学生)
金币: 17469.2
散金: 1913
红花: 36
帖子: 3126
在线: 2883小时
虫号: 590286
注册: 2008-08-31
专业: 地层学

[交流] 终于盼来apl修改，有条意见判解答已有14人参与

评价状态是
Reviewer Comments:
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Publish in APL with mandatory revision (minor)
Paper Interesting: Yes
Original Paper: Yes
Sufficient Physics: Yes
Well Organized: Yes
Clear and Error Free: No
Conclusions Supported: Yes
Appropriate Title: Yes
Good Abstract: Yes
Satisfactory English: No
Adequate References: Yes
Clear Figures: Yes
OVERALL RATING: Good

审稿人意见整体比较积极，the manuscript is worth to be published in Applied Physics Letters.但是看来要好好改改语言，虽然给别人看过都说看的还是流畅的（从审稿人推荐我加入一篇文章看得出来是日本人，不知道日本人是不是对中国人的语言要求高）。就不知道接收的希望大不大了。还有下面的一条意见不知道如何操作：Too many acronyms are used throughout the manuscript, which makes the text hard to understand. preferably, acronyms should be used as a minimum. As a goal and guideline, the authors could reduce the number of acronyms by 50%. 不知道这个术语是不是指我用的术语缩写太多，需要减少，还是术语本身太多（如果这样，就不知道怎么操作了），大家指点一下。希望沾沾15天接收的那位帅哥的喜气，顺利过关。

回复此楼