24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 5339  |  回复: 49
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

dchangkun007

金虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 投稿后一周,被退回修改,说语言不过关已有32人参与

大约一周前投的Elsevier的european polymer journal,今天被退回了,第一关技术审查就没过,编辑列了几条,第一条就是
“There are a number of grammatical errors and instances of badly worded/constructed sentences.”。其他几点是形式上的小问题。有语法错误啊!我认真改了几遍呢,还请一个已经发过几篇SCI的同学帮我改的。“badly worded/constructed sentences”是什么意思呢?是语言和结构上都很不好的句子?有人早就告诉我说这个杂志对语言要求很高,果不其然啊。怎么办呢?继续自己改呢?还是找专业公司?还是改投?有点没信心了。
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lzzxf

银虫 (小有名气)

看看给我的Comments: 11条啊 呵呵,崩溃吧
>
>1) In its current state, the level of English throughout your manuscript does not meet the journals desired standard. There are a number of grammatical errors and instances of badly worded/constructed sentences. Please check the manuscript and refine the language carefully.
>
>2) Letters to the Editor should not be more than five double-spaced manuscript pages (including references, but not including Figures) in length. Figure is allowed to put at the end of the manuscript for Letters.
>
>3) Please avoid abbreviations in article title.
>
>4) Delete "In summary...." in the conclusion. (You are supposed to be giving your conclusions, not a summary of the paper.)
>
>5) Complete addresses of three potential referees should be provided. Referees should represent at least two regions of the world.
>
>6) Abbreviations should be defined the first time they are used, BOTH in the abstract and in the main text, such as CNT in the abstract and NPs in the text. But, never define abbreviations (XRD and TEM) in an abstract unless they are used later IN THE ABSTRACT. Please delete these and make sure they are defined when first used in the text. As a result of this, one should avoid abbreviations in an abstract.
>
>7) The word "nanocomposites" is not allowed in CARBON. Replace all references to nanocomposites with "composites".
>
>8) Please avoid use of plural noun as an adjective; for example 'organic fragments route' is wrong, but 'organic fragment route' is right.
>
>9) Please use either Schematic or  Diagram. Never say "Schematic diagram"; both the words (as nouns) mean the same thing.  
>
>10) Please pay attention to the correct use of the word "respectively". This word is used to indicate that two or more lists are linked in the order in which they are mentioned. For example, in the sentence "The products were named Precursor 2 (P2), Precursor 3 (P3), and Precursor 4 (P4) according to the volume ratio of NH4OH, respectively" delete "respectively". Please make changes accordingly throughout the whole manuscript.
>
>11) In the sentence "The structural and morphological characterizations of the Si/CNT composites have been carried out using powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscope (TEM)", instrument and techniques are mixed and confused.
>
46楼2010-04-27 13:57:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 50 个回答

努力着

荣誉版主 (职业作家)

低调隐士


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
实在不行就找你们学校的留学生帮忙改改吧。我们的语言表达还是跟母语有很大差距的。
现在elsevier很多都有技术审查,说不定几个期刊合用一组技术审查呢,改投弄到同样的人手里,更不好了。
2楼2010-04-19 23:00:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dchangkun007

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by 努力着 at 2010-04-19 23:00:08:
实在不行就找你们学校的留学生帮忙改改吧。我们的语言表达还是跟母语有很大差距的。
现在elsevier很多都有技术审查,说不定几个期刊合用一组技术审查呢,改投弄到同样的人手里,更不好了。

你说得对,还要仔细改啊!
3楼2010-04-19 23:20:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ashao

银虫 (著名写手)

理文编辑or泰格斯吧
4楼2010-04-19 23:28:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见