24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1142  |  回复: 13
当前主题已经存档。

snailove

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

[交流] Macromolecules被拒,是否可补全数据再投?

2月8号投ma,昨天回来结果。一个审稿人拒,一个审稿人说小修。
想请教下,将第一个审稿人说的不足的地方补一下,把数据表证得漂亮点,该改的地方改一下,是否可以再投ma?
2个审稿人的意见如下:
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
> Reviewer: 1
>
> Recommendation: Publish as is, or with minor revisions as
> noted.
>
> Comments:
> The paper is generally interesting.  I do not have any
> serious issues.  It should be published with minor
> changes.  Some typographical errors need to be
> corrected.  For example, on page 6 (line 48)
> ‘leaving’ needs to be changed to ‘living’.
> Other queries are as follows:
> 1)    In section… “Synthesis of
> starch-based xanthate agent – Authors state that the
> “reaction mixture was allowed to react for 24
> hrs.”  It is not clear if that was at 100C or at room
> temperature?
> It is not clear how the films were prepared for the contact
> angle.  Were they conditioned at ASTM conditions or
> were they bone dry?  The contact angle will certainly
> be dependent on the condition of the films.
>
>
> Additional Questions:
> Do these findings represent a significant advance in the
> polymer field?: Yes
>
> Please rate the overall quality and clarity of the
> manuscript: Good
>
> Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes
>

> Reviewer: 2
>
> Recommendation: Do not publish.
> Comments:
> The manuscript by Lu et al on the synthesis of starch
> derivatives is potentially very interesting. However, I feel
> that it has too many analytical gaps to be suitable for
> synthesis in Macromolecules.
> The weak point of the manuscript is the analysis of the
> polymer prepared.
> The authors only showed the increase of the molecular
> weight in Figure 4, but this is not sufficient to prove the
> livingness of the system. The high PDIs suggest already that
> the polymerization is not perfect. The GPC curves should be
> displayed to show the shape (and potential formation of high
> molecular weight products). In addition, it is common
> procedure to cleave the arms from the backbone to confirm
> that the molecular weight of the arm is close to the
> theoretical value.
> Other comments:
> Scheme 1: The authors should consider that two products are
> formed when adding on to the double bond. I don’t think it
> has an effect on the polymerization though.
> Figure 2: There is a CH2 group missing in the structure of
> the NMR shown. The missing group is also not assigned
> I recommend showing the NMR of the hydrolyzed product to
> confirm that all the groups have been hydrolyzed. FT-IR
> analysis is only complementary
> Unfortunately, I cannot recommend publication this time,
> but I recommend the authors to spend more time on further
> investigations. This could be potentially nice work

  第二个审稿人最后一句话是否可以理解为如果再补全数据,把数据做更漂亮可以再投ma试试?

  希望有经验的虫友给些建议,万分感谢。
PS: 编辑的意见是拒绝.编辑采纳了第二个审稿人的意见.

[ Last edited by snailove on 2010-3-16 at 23:09 ]
回复此楼
Impossibleisnothing,nothingisimpossible.
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

王超

木虫 (正式写手)

snailove(金币+2):谢谢你的建议 2010-03-16 15:20
应该可以,支持!
相识是缘分
2楼2010-03-16 13:08:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sunke

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

snailove(金币+2):谢谢你的建议. 2010-03-16 15:20
补全数据再投吧,接受的可能还是很大的。
3楼2010-03-16 13:26:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sunke

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

snailove(金币+2):谢谢你的建议. 2010-03-16 15:20
忘记送上祝福了哈
4楼2010-03-16 13:26:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yhz2005

木虫 (职业作家)

村长

snailove(金币+2):谢谢你的建议. 2010-03-16 15:20
可以的,我们这边就有这种的,最后中了
别拿村长不当干部!
5楼2010-03-16 14:08:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wazyg

木虫 (正式写手)

snailove(金币+2):谢谢你的建议. 2010-03-16 15:20
这个可以投
祝福楼主!
6楼2010-03-16 14:13:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tayin

木虫 (正式写手)

snailove(金币+1):谢谢你的建议. 2010-03-16 21:08
希望很大,不试试怎么知道呢
7楼2010-03-16 20:11:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yf0534

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

snailove(金币+1):谢谢,托你吉言! 2010-03-16 23:21
同意楼上的建议,不过编辑的意见如何呢,这个时候主要看编辑了
8楼2010-03-16 22:04:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

feiyulian

金虫 (著名写手)

snailove(金币+1):谢谢,托你吉言! 2010-03-16 23:21
那么关键是编辑给你的决定是什么?修改后再投,还是拒稿?楼主说清楚点
9楼2010-03-16 22:18:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hitechceram

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

SCI

snailove(金币+1):谢谢,托你吉言! 2010-03-16 23:22
 感觉第二个审稿人的意见更专业,值得楼主借鉴。好好修改,重投没有问题的,因为审稿人认为你的工作很有意义。
10楼2010-03-16 22:22:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 snailove 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 cHIDTWCTtLlG 2026-08-19 5/250 2026-08-19 17:30 by oCMhZAsgNFoO
[基金申请] 欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律 +53 医学老男孩 2026-08-13 117/5850 2026-08-19 17:12 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] filecode=后面第一个是大写字母 +10 wangze12014 2026-08-14 12/600 2026-08-19 16:56 by 苦难博士
[教师之家] 为什么余额宝的年化利率越来越低?主要原因有哪些? +4 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-15 4/200 2026-08-19 16:23 by allmydream
[基金申请] 今天放榜吗? +12 布布和一二 2026-08-19 13/650 2026-08-19 14:33 by 陈晨晨陈啊
[基金申请] 今天基金会出结果吗?20260819 +8 kkkl_v 2026-08-19 8/400 2026-08-19 12:34 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 朋友圈看到的 +6 wangzilk 2026-08-18 8/400 2026-08-19 10:55 by Haru815
[基金申请] 时间戳变了,能看出什么问题? +10 基诺咪客 2026-08-17 14/700 2026-08-19 10:34 by 基诺咪客
[基金申请] 快农历七夕节了,轻松一下,男人悄悄话,女施主请不要进来。 +6 Tide man 2026-08-14 7/350 2026-08-19 09:56 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 什么时候开奖? +6 CrisMessi 2026-08-18 6/300 2026-08-19 08:06 by Equinoxhua
[基金申请] 重要消息,中午系统在维护 +10 yuleib84 2026-08-18 11/550 2026-08-19 07:30 by 羽毛枫f
[基金申请] 明天放榜? +5 Shxjjxjkx 2026-08-18 5/250 2026-08-18 18:14 by -大大大大大-
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了8-15 +14 archvillain 2026-08-15 26/1300 2026-08-18 13:37 by phantomgost
[基金申请] 今天维护系统维护 祝所有人 高中 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-18 9/450 2026-08-18 13:01 by 家与远方
[基金申请] 哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜? +13 Ldrop2023 2026-08-13 16/800 2026-08-18 12:25 by 淀粉搬运工
[基金申请] 感觉是下周放榜了 +6 angus9576 2026-08-17 11/550 2026-08-17 23:57 by angus9576
[基金申请] 今天系统多次维护,明天很可能放榜! +8 zju2000 2026-08-16 9/450 2026-08-17 12:20 by lmz0216
[精细化工] 招聘 金属平磨液,抛光液研发工程师 +3 小天0311 2026-08-14 3/150 2026-08-16 07:31 by H9PLUS
[基金申请] 各位道友,我要去昆明玩几天,回来见。 +7 Tide man 2026-08-14 8/400 2026-08-15 01:11 by arzu_hma
[基金申请] 重要来源:本周末出结果 +10 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-12 10/500 2026-08-13 15:46 by likettle
信息提示
请填处理意见