| 查看: 635 | 回复: 4 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
huangli8200新虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
请教审稿意见如何回复，谢谢！
|
|
|
今天一篇文章返回了审稿意见。主编的意见其中有一条是： Also, the experiment involves only two experimental mice, which makes the results more suggestive than quantitative. For this reason, please be careful to not overstate the conclusions. The tentative nature of these results make this paper more of a technical note than a research manuscript, and the revision should be shortened accordingly.最后这一句是不是说文章要回收一些结论（不可做出太多远的夸大的推论），然后还要缩短文章篇幅？这该怎么回复呢？ -- |
回复此楼
3楼2010-02-23 22:30:18
2楼2010-02-23 22:30:15
huangli8200
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 12
- 帖子: 77
- 在线: 13.2小时
- 虫号: 678369
- 注册: 2008-12-20
- 专业: medical imaging
|
笔记没什么意思吧？笔记的影响力太小了吧，不知道申请letter行不行呢?其实主编的全部评语是：Please have the revision of this paper reviewed and edited by someone with a good command of written English. The revision should address each and every comment of the referees, including the need for adequate data analysis and quantitation of experimental results. Also, the experiment involves only two experimental mice, which makes the results more suggestive than quantitative. For this reason, please be careful to not overstate the conclusions. The tentative nature of these results make this paper more of a technical note than a research manuscript, and the revision should be shortened accordingly.其实其中一个实验我做了不仅仅是两只老鼠，是两组老鼠，每组有几只的，审稿人没完全读完文章，自己以为我们只做了两只老鼠的。 [ Last edited by huangli8200 on 2010-2-28 at 01:03 ] |
4楼2010-02-28 00:41:38
huangli8200
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 12
- 帖子: 77
- 在线: 13.2小时
- 虫号: 678369
- 注册: 2008-12-20
- 专业: medical imaging
5楼2010-02-28 10:13:46