| 查看: 619 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
huangli8200新虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
请教审稿意见如何回复，谢谢！
|
||
|
今天一篇文章返回了审稿意见。主编的意见其中有一条是： Also, the experiment involves only two experimental mice, which makes the results more suggestive than quantitative. For this reason, please be careful to not overstate the conclusions. The tentative nature of these results make this paper more of a technical note than a research manuscript, and the revision should be shortened accordingly.最后这一句是不是说文章要回收一些结论（不可做出太多远的夸大的推论），然后还要缩短文章篇幅？这该怎么回复呢？ -- |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组招收博士研究生
已经有9人回复
-
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组｜2027级博士研究生招生公告
已经有9人回复
-
申博发邮件
已经有11人回复
-
实名举报：华南理工大学物理与光电学院副院长李志远婚内两次出轨女学生（博士）
已经有13人回复
-
现代”学阀”该如何界定
已经有7人回复
-
各位大神，目前国内有哪些比较好用的逆合成软件？
已经有12人回复
-
我的奶奶
已经有3人回复
-
国社科系统bug了，是不是要放榜了？
已经有9人回复
2楼2010-02-23 22:30:15
3楼2010-02-23 22:30:18
huangli8200
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 12
- 帖子: 77
- 在线: 13.2小时
- 虫号: 678369
- 注册: 2008-12-20
- 专业: medical imaging
|
笔记没什么意思吧？笔记的影响力太小了吧，不知道申请letter行不行呢?其实主编的全部评语是：Please have the revision of this paper reviewed and edited by someone with a good command of written English. The revision should address each and every comment of the referees, including the need for adequate data analysis and quantitation of experimental results. Also, the experiment involves only two experimental mice, which makes the results more suggestive than quantitative. For this reason, please be careful to not overstate the conclusions. The tentative nature of these results make this paper more of a technical note than a research manuscript, and the revision should be shortened accordingly.其实其中一个实验我做了不仅仅是两只老鼠，是两组老鼠，每组有几只的，审稿人没完全读完文章，自己以为我们只做了两只老鼠的。 [ Last edited by huangli8200 on 2010-2-28 at 01:03 ] |
4楼2010-02-28 00:41:38
huangli8200
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 12
- 帖子: 77
- 在线: 13.2小时
- 虫号: 678369
- 注册: 2008-12-20
- 专业: medical imaging
5楼2010-02-28 10:13:46