| 查看: 499 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
huangli8200新虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
请教审稿意见如何回复，谢谢！
|
||
|
今天一篇文章返回了审稿意见。主编的意见其中有一条是： Also, the experiment involves only two experimental mice, which makes the results more suggestive than quantitative. For this reason, please be careful to not overstate the conclusions. The tentative nature of these results make this paper more of a technical note than a research manuscript, and the revision should be shortened accordingly.最后这一句是不是说文章要回收一些结论（不可做出太多远的夸大的推论），然后还要缩短文章篇幅？这该怎么回复呢？ -- |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有9人回复
-
版面费该交吗
已经有9人回复
-
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有13人回复
-
面上可以超过30页吧？
已经有4人回复
-
“人文社科而论，许多学术研究还没有达到民国时期的水平”
已经有5人回复
-
什么是人一生最重要的？
已经有4人回复
2楼2010-02-23 22:30:15
3楼2010-02-23 22:30:18
huangli8200
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 12
- 帖子: 77
- 在线: 13.2小时
- 虫号: 678369
- 注册: 2008-12-20
- 专业: medical imaging
|
笔记没什么意思吧？笔记的影响力太小了吧，不知道申请letter行不行呢?其实主编的全部评语是：Please have the revision of this paper reviewed and edited by someone with a good command of written English. The revision should address each and every comment of the referees, including the need for adequate data analysis and quantitation of experimental results. Also, the experiment involves only two experimental mice, which makes the results more suggestive than quantitative. For this reason, please be careful to not overstate the conclusions. The tentative nature of these results make this paper more of a technical note than a research manuscript, and the revision should be shortened accordingly.其实其中一个实验我做了不仅仅是两只老鼠，是两组老鼠，每组有几只的，审稿人没完全读完文章，自己以为我们只做了两只老鼠的。 [ Last edited by huangli8200 on 2010-2-28 at 01:03 ] |
4楼2010-02-28 00:41:38
huangli8200
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 12
- 帖子: 77
- 在线: 13.2小时
- 虫号: 678369
- 注册: 2008-12-20
- 专业: medical imaging
5楼2010-02-28 10:13:46