| 查看: 568 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
huangli8200新虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
请教审稿意见如何回复，谢谢！
|
||
|
今天一篇文章返回了审稿意见。主编的意见其中有一条是： Also, the experiment involves only two experimental mice, which makes the results more suggestive than quantitative. For this reason, please be careful to not overstate the conclusions. The tentative nature of these results make this paper more of a technical note than a research manuscript, and the revision should be shortened accordingly.最后这一句是不是说文章要回收一些结论（不可做出太多远的夸大的推论），然后还要缩短文章篇幅？这该怎么回复呢？ -- |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
2026年国自然面上资助率
已经有3人回复
-
微信指数没变化，科研之友没阅读
已经有16人回复
-
小木虫看见有人已经知道结果了
已经有17人回复
-
系统今天又提示维护了，估计离放榜不远了
已经有12人回复
-
今年的WR进展到哪一步了？
已经有9人回复
-
产物和副产物价值比较
已经有5人回复
-
时间戳他又来了
已经有17人回复
-
这个自发加氧反应的机理是什么？
已经有7人回复
-
J-J-W不为人知的一面
已经有19人回复
-
没消息就是被刷了呗
已经有14人回复
2楼2010-02-23 22:30:15
3楼2010-02-23 22:30:18
huangli8200
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 12
- 帖子: 77
- 在线: 13.2小时
- 虫号: 678369
- 注册: 2008-12-20
- 专业: medical imaging
|
笔记没什么意思吧？笔记的影响力太小了吧，不知道申请letter行不行呢?其实主编的全部评语是：Please have the revision of this paper reviewed and edited by someone with a good command of written English. The revision should address each and every comment of the referees, including the need for adequate data analysis and quantitation of experimental results. Also, the experiment involves only two experimental mice, which makes the results more suggestive than quantitative. For this reason, please be careful to not overstate the conclusions. The tentative nature of these results make this paper more of a technical note than a research manuscript, and the revision should be shortened accordingly.其实其中一个实验我做了不仅仅是两只老鼠，是两组老鼠，每组有几只的，审稿人没完全读完文章，自己以为我们只做了两只老鼠的。 [ Last edited by huangli8200 on 2010-2-28 at 01:03 ] |
4楼2010-02-28 00:41:38
huangli8200
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 12
- 帖子: 77
- 在线: 13.2小时
- 虫号: 678369
- 注册: 2008-12-20
- 专业: medical imaging
5楼2010-02-28 10:13:46