24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3879)
>导师招生 (405)
>硕博家园 (247)
>虫友互识 (237)
>文献求助 (110)
>招聘信息布告栏 (98)
>考博 (89)
>博后之家 (39)
>休闲灌水 (27)
>基金申请 (21)
>论文投稿 (18)
>找工作 (16)
>公派出国 (15)
>有机交流 (14)
>考研 (13)
>教师之家 (12)

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

springimu

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 4129.2
散金: 695
红花: 4
帖子: 1417
在线: 129.8小时
虫号: 491937
注册: 2008-01-07
性别: GG
专业: 生物信息学

[交流] 遇到审稿专家的据稿的负面审稿意见，大家都是如何巧妙回答？

昨天收到文章修改稿的审稿意见：
编辑的意见：
Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision
基本上是些客套话！就是让根据审稿意见修改！
下面的话是三个审稿人的建议，很简单，怎么回答呢？

Reviewer #2: The authors gave a positive answer to the concerns made by the reviewers, including those raised my myself. I think the manuscript can contribute to better understanding****（正面评价）
Reviewer #3: Though the paper is interesting, the authors has not yet considered my comments, this will mislead readers in this hot topic. I suggest a rejection , and encourge the authors to present their work in international conference for open discussion.（

负面评价

）
Reviewer #4: The authors largely improved their manuscript that now is worth of publication. Many compliments to them !（正面评价）
如何巧妙应答审稿专家的据稿的负面审稿意见？
高手们帮帮忙！！

回答楼主们的意见：审稿意见给的是 Rivse
不知道是大修还是小修？
怎么办?

[ Last edited by springimu on 2010-2-5 at 15:56 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

国社科系统bug了，是不是要放榜了？已经有10人回复
现代”学阀”该如何界定已经有9人回复
课题组招2027级博士上海工程技术大学激光智能制造方向已经有4人回复
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组 2027级博士研究生招生已经有3人回复
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组｜2027级博士研究生招生公告已经有11人回复
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组-博士研究生已经有10人回复
申博发邮件已经有11人回复
各位大神，目前国内有哪些比较好用的逆合成软件？已经有12人回复
我的奶奶已经有3人回复

因为陌生,所以勇敢;因为距离,所以美丽

1楼 2010-02-04 17:03:03

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

Doctorcbw

木虫 (职业作家)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.45
金币: 2804.1
散金: 357
红花: 8
帖子: 3682
在线: 479.4小时
虫号: 663997
注册: 2008-11-28
性别: GG
专业: 控制理论与方法

★
springimu(金币+1):谢谢参与

文章现在怎么样了  我的文章意见如下：
下面是编辑的意见：
Dear Dr. **

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.

下面是审稿人的意见：
In the present form the article is not suitable for pub-
lication in Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications. I suggest that the
authors revise and resubmit the article.The authors should carefully review the manuscript before a new submission.

然后给了6个corrections are needed  还说英语差: