| 查看: 2807 | 回复: 27 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
springimu木虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
遇到审稿专家的据稿的负面审稿意见，大家都是如何巧妙回答？
|
||
|
昨天收到文章修改稿的审稿意见： 编辑的意见： Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision 基本上是些客套话！就是让根据审稿意见修改！ 下面的话是三个审稿人的建议，很简单，怎么回答呢？ Reviewer #2: The authors gave a positive answer to the concerns made by the reviewers, including those raised my myself. I think the manuscript can contribute to better understanding****（正面评价） Reviewer #3: Though the paper is interesting, the authors has not yet considered my comments, this will mislead readers in this hot topic. I suggest a rejection , and encourge the authors to present their work in international conference for open discussion.（  负面评价）Reviewer #4: The authors largely improved their manuscript that now is worth of publication. Many compliments to them !（正面评价） 如何巧妙应答审稿专家的据稿的负面审稿意见？ 高手们帮帮忙！！ 回答楼主们的意见：审稿意见给的是 Rivse 不知道是大修还是小修？ 怎么办? [ Last edited by springimu on 2010-2-5 at 15:56 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
308求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
NSFC申报书里申请人简历中代表性论著还需要在申报书最后的附件里面再上传一遍吗
已经有14人回复
-
材料与化工一志愿南昌大学327求调剂推荐
已经有6人回复
-
化学调剂0703
已经有7人回复
-
327求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
调剂
已经有8人回复
-
梁成伟老师课题组欢迎你的加入
已经有7人回复
-
伙伴们，祝我生日快乐吧
已经有24人回复
-
中科院材料273求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
材料工程专硕274一志愿211求调剂
已经有5人回复
rfxu
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1031
- 帖子: 1017
- 在线: 6.7小时
- 虫号: 809123
- 注册: 2009-07-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子化学与物理,材料化学
2楼2010-02-04 17:07:41
