| 查看: 3073 | 回复: 27 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
springimu木虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
遇到审稿专家的据稿的负面审稿意见，大家都是如何巧妙回答？
|
||
|
昨天收到文章修改稿的审稿意见： 编辑的意见： Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision 基本上是些客套话！就是让根据审稿意见修改！ 下面的话是三个审稿人的建议，很简单，怎么回答呢？ Reviewer #2: The authors gave a positive answer to the concerns made by the reviewers, including those raised my myself. I think the manuscript can contribute to better understanding****（正面评价） Reviewer #3: Though the paper is interesting, the authors has not yet considered my comments, this will mislead readers in this hot topic. I suggest a rejection , and encourge the authors to present their work in international conference for open discussion.（  负面评价）Reviewer #4: The authors largely improved their manuscript that now is worth of publication. Many compliments to them !（正面评价） 如何巧妙应答审稿专家的据稿的负面审稿意见？ 高手们帮帮忙！！ 回答楼主们的意见：审稿意见给的是 Rivse 不知道是大修还是小修？ 怎么办? [ Last edited by springimu on 2010-2-5 at 15:56 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
什么时候开奖？
已经有4人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有27人回复
-
为什么余额宝的年化利率越来越低？主要原因有哪些？
已经有3人回复
-
2027广东省杰青
已经有9人回复
-
朋友圈看到的
已经有5人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有110人回复
-
明天放榜？
已经有5人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有11人回复
-
重要消息，中午系统在维护
已经有10人回复
-
投稿咨询
已经有6人回复
rfxu
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1031
- 帖子: 1017
- 在线: 6.7小时
- 虫号: 809123
- 注册: 2009-07-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子化学与物理,材料化学
2楼2010-02-04 17:07:41
