24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

springimu

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 4129.2
散金: 695
红花: 4
帖子: 1417
在线: 129.8小时
虫号: 491937
注册: 2008-01-07
性别: GG
专业: 生物信息学

[交流] 遇到审稿专家的据稿的负面审稿意见，大家都是如何巧妙回答？

昨天收到文章修改稿的审稿意见：
编辑的意见：
Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision
基本上是些客套话！就是让根据审稿意见修改！
下面的话是三个审稿人的建议，很简单，怎么回答呢？

Reviewer #2: The authors gave a positive answer to the concerns made by the reviewers, including those raised my myself. I think the manuscript can contribute to better understanding****（正面评价）
Reviewer #3: Though the paper is interesting, the authors has not yet considered my comments, this will mislead readers in this hot topic. I suggest a rejection , and encourge the authors to present their work in international conference for open discussion.（

负面评价

）
Reviewer #4: The authors largely improved their manuscript that now is worth of publication. Many compliments to them !（正面评价）
如何巧妙应答审稿专家的据稿的负面审稿意见？
高手们帮帮忙！！

回答楼主们的意见：审稿意见给的是 Rivse
不知道是大修还是小修？
怎么办?

[ Last edited by springimu on 2010-2-5 at 15:56 ]

回复此楼