| 查看: 2802 | 回复: 27 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
springimu木虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
遇到审稿专家的据稿的负面审稿意见,大家都是如何巧妙回答?
|
||
|
昨天收到文章修改稿的审稿意见: 编辑的意见: Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision 基本上是些客套话!就是让根据审稿意见修改! 下面的话是三个审稿人的建议,很简单,怎么回答呢? Reviewer #2: The authors gave a positive answer to the concerns made by the reviewers, including those raised my myself. I think the manuscript can contribute to better understanding****(正面评价) Reviewer #3: Though the paper is interesting, the authors has not yet considered my comments, this will mislead readers in this hot topic. I suggest a rejection , and encourge the authors to present their work in international conference for open discussion.( 负面评价 )Reviewer #4: The authors largely improved their manuscript that now is worth of publication. Many compliments to them !(正面评价) 如何巧妙应答审稿专家的据稿的负面审稿意见? 高手们帮帮忙!! 回答楼主们的意见:审稿意见给的是 Rivse 不知道是大修还是小修? 怎么办? [ Last edited by springimu on 2010-2-5 at 15:56 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有10人回复
今年春晚有几个节目很不错,点赞!
已经有12人回复
情人节自我反思:在爱情中有过遗憾吗?
已经有13人回复
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层,如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有12人回复
基金正文30页指的是报告正文还是整个申请书
已经有5人回复

yiweitiande
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 7605.7
- 散金: 491
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 1179
- 在线: 499小时
- 虫号: 290971
- 注册: 2006-10-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 药物化学

13楼2010-02-12 06:17:31
rfxu
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1031
- 帖子: 1017
- 在线: 6.7小时
- 虫号: 809123
- 注册: 2009-07-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子化学与物理,材料化学
2楼2010-02-04 17:07:41
redcrag
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1778.2
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 1163
- 在线: 45小时
- 虫号: 254694
- 注册: 2006-05-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学

3楼2010-02-04 18:29:51
feitian1984
银虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 326.8
- 散金: 444
- 帖子: 816
- 在线: 42.6小时
- 虫号: 940460
- 注册: 2010-01-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 海洋地质学
5楼2010-02-04 18:39:16













负面评价
回复此楼