| 查看: 968 | 回复: 22 | |||
[交流]
审稿意见回来后，如何处理不合理的返修意见？
|
|||
|
我之前投了运筹优化领域的一个期刊ejor，第一轮审稿意见回来后，有三个专家，我按照他们的意见做了相应的修改并提交了回去，现在结果又回来了，第二和三个审稿人的意见是可以接收了。但是第一个审稿人reviewer 1又提出了两个意见，这两个意见我认为是不能改的，我个人认为是reviewer 1没正确理解文章所做出的不合理意见。然后主编看到这种情况，就有了以下的决定。 主编： As you can see from the reports enclosed, the referees hold conflicting views on your paper. In these circumstances, it has been decided that your paper should be reconsidered for publication in the EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH if you will revise it to meet the enclosed referees' comments. (You may wish to argue that some comments are invalid). The most critical comments from Reviewer #1 made me doubt whether I should reconsider your paper, so I need convincing arguments from you and a thorough revision to counterbalance the critical comments. When resubmitting the revised paper, please provide your answers to the referees, separately for each referee. Please also ensure that you have cited recent and relevant publications in EJOR and other OR journals. I am most grateful for your interest and hope that you will not be deterred from resubmitting this paper in the very near future. You are advised to revise and resubmit your manuscript by the Mar 09, 2026. After this time the review process of this submission will be terminated, by withdrawing your paper from the Editorial Manager, and the revised paper will have to be submitted as a new submission. Reviewer #2: All my comments have been suitably addressed. I recommend that this paper be accepted in its present version. I congratulate the authors on a very interesting paper with a solid contribution. Reviewer #3: Thank you for your careful and meticulous revision. In this revision, I find that the manuscript has fully responded to the reviewer comments from the first round. The writing and flow has been substantially improved, and the motivations, contributions, literature review, and conclusions were carefully revised. The parameter settings for the case studies have also been sufficiently justified, and I appreciate the additional figures and plots to help the audience understand the results. The quality of the article has been substantially improved after addressing all the comments from the reviewers. I have no remaining requests for revision, and I appreciate your thorough and professional response. Good luck with your future research. Reviewer #1: Thanks for the efforts that the authors have put into revising the manuscript. However, I feel that my earlier concerns have not been fully addressed. And in my view, the current version has not yet reached the standard required for publication in EJOR. Below, I outline the major points that still need attention. 意见1：。。。。。。 意见2：。。。。。。意见1和2我就不详细列出来了，因为涉及具体的文章内容。 Overall, I like the method proposed by the authors and I can see the value, however, I find that both the depth of analysis and the clarity of presentation still require substantial improvement. 现在我的可选行动方案是： (1) 我不会再修改了，但是给主编发个邮件，解释Reviewer #1的两个个人认为不合理的意见，然后改投另一个期刊。 (2) 我不可能再大修了，但会做一些句子连贯上的小修，然后在Response letter写出个人认为的修改意见的不合理之处，然后再重新提交ejor，我估计会不被接受，所以这时候是不是系统上只有这一次新的submission的拒绝记录(如果不被接受)？因为之前的submission和Reviewer2和3的意见都被删除了？ 如果我采取方案2，然后被拒绝后再去投其它omaga一类的期刊会不会有什么影响？ 谢谢~ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有6人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
中国石油大学（华东）吴传德教授团队（国家杰青）2026硕、博招生
+2/238
-
湖南大学材料院陶益杰老师招收2026年秋季入学博士生一名及联合培养硕士学生一名
+1/186
-
华南师范大学（211）- 光电科学与工程学院 - 申请审核制（2026年4-5月份面试考核）
+2/142
-
香港科技大学（广州）黄加强课题组智能电池方向博士招聘
+1/84
-
山东征女友，坐标济南
+1/62
-
上海交通大学大气环境科学课题组招收2026年入学博士生
+1/44
-
上海交大药学院侯四化课题组招收2名2026年秋季入学申请-考核制博士生
+1/38
-
湖南大学袁达飞课题组招收第二批2026年9月入学的博士研究生一名
+1/36
-
操作求助
+1/33
-
中国科学技术大学环境系招生
+1/21
-
北京工业大学化生学院青年教师或“青年优秀人才”招聘启事
+1/11
-
中科院深圳先进院-免疫治疗方向-招收1名博士生(26年9月入学)
+1/10
-
澳科大药诚招2026年秋季药剂学/生物材料硕士研究生
+1/8
-
2026年 陕西科技大学 环境学院 招收博士生（化学/材料/环境/生物 背景均可）
+1/8
-
哈工大（深圳）物理招收2026年9月入学博士生1个名额
+1/6
-
《中文期刊点评》这个模块，怎么不能点评期刊了呢自动跳转到主页了
+1/5
-
国家“双一流”建设高校-南京林业大学-国家级青年人才团队招聘 2026级博士研究生
+1/5
-
美国密苏里大学“柔性电子”课题组诚招博士研究生
+1/4
-
中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院——招聘博士后
+3/1
-
Advanced Science审稿周期一般要多久
+1/1
3楼2025-09-13 18:21:30
9楼2025-09-13 19:47:59
15楼2025-09-13 21:35:44
16楼2025-09-13 21:36:41
★
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
不积极认真回应审稿人1的问题，很大几率编辑不会接收。建议以充分的文献调研和数据支撑反驳审稿人1意见，一般性的回复作用不大。 发自小木虫手机客户端 |
» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
BayesInter18楼2025-09-13 23:12:15
22楼2025-09-14 14:20:51
简单回复
tzynew2楼
2025-09-13 18:16
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
o 发自小木虫手机客户端
2025-09-13 18:25
回复
2025-09-13 18:47
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zusn6楼
2025-09-13 18:48
回复
我才是肖牧冲7楼
2025-09-13 19:18
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫手机客户端
2025-09-13 19:34
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
elainzaizai10楼
2025-09-13 19:54
回复
miaojiabing11楼
2025-09-13 20:50
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
没有感觉的鱼12楼
2025-09-13 20:57
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫IOS客户端
明天会更好12313楼
2025-09-13 21:05
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫手机客户端
ygxzxd14楼
2025-09-13 21:27
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
?? 发自小木虫IOS客户端
psylhh17楼
2025-09-13 22:58
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
LifePursuit19楼
2025-09-14 00:23
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
嗯 发自小木虫手机客户端
nono200920楼
2025-09-14 09:40
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
·
庚辰辛丑21楼
2025-09-14 13:57
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
lfy800823楼
2025-09-14 15:40
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
