| 查看: 1971 | 回复: 22 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
审稿意见回来后，如何处理不合理的返修意见？
|
|||
|
我之前投了运筹优化领域的一个期刊ejor，第一轮审稿意见回来后，有三个专家，我按照他们的意见做了相应的修改并提交了回去，现在结果又回来了，第二和三个审稿人的意见是可以接收了。但是第一个审稿人reviewer 1又提出了两个意见，这两个意见我认为是不能改的，我个人认为是reviewer 1没正确理解文章所做出的不合理意见。然后主编看到这种情况，就有了以下的决定。 主编： As you can see from the reports enclosed, the referees hold conflicting views on your paper. In these circumstances, it has been decided that your paper should be reconsidered for publication in the EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH if you will revise it to meet the enclosed referees' comments. (You may wish to argue that some comments are invalid). The most critical comments from Reviewer #1 made me doubt whether I should reconsider your paper, so I need convincing arguments from you and a thorough revision to counterbalance the critical comments. When resubmitting the revised paper, please provide your answers to the referees, separately for each referee. Please also ensure that you have cited recent and relevant publications in EJOR and other OR journals. I am most grateful for your interest and hope that you will not be deterred from resubmitting this paper in the very near future. You are advised to revise and resubmit your manuscript by the Mar 09, 2026. After this time the review process of this submission will be terminated, by withdrawing your paper from the Editorial Manager, and the revised paper will have to be submitted as a new submission. Reviewer #2: All my comments have been suitably addressed. I recommend that this paper be accepted in its present version. I congratulate the authors on a very interesting paper with a solid contribution. Reviewer #3: Thank you for your careful and meticulous revision. In this revision, I find that the manuscript has fully responded to the reviewer comments from the first round. The writing and flow has been substantially improved, and the motivations, contributions, literature review, and conclusions were carefully revised. The parameter settings for the case studies have also been sufficiently justified, and I appreciate the additional figures and plots to help the audience understand the results. The quality of the article has been substantially improved after addressing all the comments from the reviewers. I have no remaining requests for revision, and I appreciate your thorough and professional response. Good luck with your future research. Reviewer #1: Thanks for the efforts that the authors have put into revising the manuscript. However, I feel that my earlier concerns have not been fully addressed. And in my view, the current version has not yet reached the standard required for publication in EJOR. Below, I outline the major points that still need attention. 意见1：。。。。。。 意见2：。。。。。。意见1和2我就不详细列出来了，因为涉及具体的文章内容。 Overall, I like the method proposed by the authors and I can see the value, however, I find that both the depth of analysis and the clarity of presentation still require substantial improvement. 现在我的可选行动方案是： (1) 我不会再修改了，但是给主编发个邮件，解释Reviewer #1的两个个人认为不合理的意见，然后改投另一个期刊。 (2) 我不可能再大修了，但会做一些句子连贯上的小修，然后在Response letter写出个人认为的修改意见的不合理之处，然后再重新提交ejor，我估计会不被接受，所以这时候是不是系统上只有这一次新的submission的拒绝记录(如果不被接受)？因为之前的submission和Reviewer2和3的意见都被删除了？ 如果我采取方案2，然后被拒绝后再去投其它omaga一类的期刊会不会有什么影响？ 谢谢~ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
能否申诉？
已经有8人回复
-
梦想
已经有5人回复
-
中青基了要发朋友圈吗？
已经有7人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
-
29号明天会评吗
已经有4人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有10人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有12人回复
-
面上意见出来了
已经有19人回复
-
为什么到现在没收到通知？
已经有5人回复
-
有没有仍没收到信息的
已经有8人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
开心就散金
+5/1740
-
面上中了，散金币。
+5/1415
-
云南大学丁军桥团队2027年博士招生
+1/945
-
八年奋战，面上中了，同时一个读了8年的博士（中途接手）答辩通过了，都是涉险过关
+2/344
-
天平合规性问题
+1/104
-
【半导体薄膜代工】ALD/CVD/磁控溅射/热蒸发全工艺
+1/94
-
原子层沉积（ALD）磁控溅射PECVD等微纳代工服务：18817872921
+1/91
-
东南大学能源与环境学院-林日琛教授课题组-27级博士招生
+1/86
-
征友避雷上海【荀玄武】
+1/80
-
很认可这句话
+1/78
-
深圳大学刘翼振课题组诚聘博士后（CRISPR分子诊断）
+1/36
-
中南大学化学化工学院喻桂朋教授团队诚聘博士后（复合材料方向）
+1/15
-
中南大学化学化工学院喻桂朋教授团队诚聘博士后（复合材料方向）
+1/13
-
湖南大学张旺课题组招收推免硕士
+1/9
-
北京师范大学（珠海）化学传感与成像课题组2026年研究生（统招/推免）招生
+1/7
-
湖南大学张旺课题组招收研究助理
+1/7
-
多重蛋白检测定量技术赋能心血管疾病基础与转化研究
+1/5
-
抗体筛选研发岗位
+1/4
-
项目助理招聘启事
+1/2
-
香港大学智能制造实验室招收27年春秋季入学全奖博士和硕士研究生
+1/1
3楼2025-09-13 18:21:30
9楼2025-09-13 19:47:59
简单回复
tzynew2楼
2025-09-13 18:16
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
o 发自小木虫手机客户端
zusn6楼
2025-09-13 18:48
回复
没有感觉的鱼12楼
2025-09-13 20:57
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫IOS客户端
我才是肖牧冲7楼
2025-09-13 19:18
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫手机客户端
2025-09-13 18:25
回复
elainzaizai10楼
2025-09-13 19:54
回复
ygxzxd14楼
2025-09-13 21:27
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
?? 发自小木虫IOS客户端
明天会更好12313楼
2025-09-13 21:05
回复
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫手机客户端
投票: