24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1090  |  回复: 22
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

BayesInter

专家顾问 (正式写手)


[交流] 审稿意见回来后,如何处理不合理的返修意见?

我之前投了运筹优化领域的一个期刊ejor,第一轮审稿意见回来后,有三个专家,我按照他们的意见做了相应的修改并提交了回去,现在结果又回来了,第二和三个审稿人的意见是可以接收了。但是第一个审稿人reviewer 1又提出了两个意见,这两个意见我认为是不能改的,我个人认为是reviewer 1没正确理解文章所做出的不合理意见。然后主编看到这种情况,就有了以下的决定。

主编:
As you can see from the reports enclosed, the referees hold conflicting views on your paper. In these circumstances, it has been decided that your paper should be reconsidered for publication in the EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH if you will revise it to meet the enclosed referees' comments. (You may wish to argue that some comments are invalid).

The most critical comments from Reviewer #1 made me doubt whether I should reconsider your paper, so I need convincing arguments from you and a thorough revision to counterbalance the critical comments.

When resubmitting the revised paper, please provide your answers to the referees, separately for each referee.  Please also ensure that you have cited recent and relevant publications in EJOR and other OR journals.

I am most grateful for your interest and hope that you will not be deterred from resubmitting this paper in the very near future.

You are advised to revise and resubmit your manuscript by the Mar 09, 2026. After this time the review process of this submission will be terminated, by withdrawing your paper from the Editorial Manager, and the revised paper will have to be submitted as a new submission.

Reviewer #2: All my comments have been suitably addressed. I recommend that this paper be accepted in its present version. I congratulate the authors on a very interesting paper with a solid contribution.

Reviewer #3: Thank you for your careful and meticulous revision. In this revision, I find that the manuscript has fully responded to the reviewer comments from the first round. The writing and flow has been substantially improved, and the motivations, contributions, literature review, and conclusions were carefully revised. The parameter settings for the case studies have also been sufficiently justified, and I appreciate the additional figures and plots to help the audience understand the results.
The quality of the article has been substantially improved after addressing all the comments from the reviewers. I have no remaining requests for revision, and I appreciate your thorough and professional response.
Good luck with your future research.

Reviewer #1: Thanks for the efforts that the authors have put into revising the manuscript. However, I feel that my earlier concerns have not been fully addressed. And in my view, the current version has not yet reached the standard required for publication in EJOR. Below, I outline the major points that still need attention.
意见1:。。。。。。
意见2:。。。。。。意见1和2我就不详细列出来了,因为涉及具体的文章内容。
Overall, I like the method proposed by the authors and I can see the value, however, I find that both the depth of analysis and the clarity of presentation still require substantial improvement.

现在我的可选行动方案是:
(1) 我不会再修改了,但是给主编发个邮件,解释Reviewer #1的两个个人认为不合理的意见,然后改投另一个期刊。
(2) 我不可能再大修了,但会做一些句子连贯上的小修,然后在Response letter写出个人认为的修改意见的不合理之处,然后再重新提交ejor,我估计会不被接受,所以这时候是不是系统上只有这一次新的submission的拒绝记录(如果不被接受)?因为之前的submission和Reviewer2和3的意见都被删除了?

如果我采取方案2,然后被拒绝后再去投其它omaga一类的期刊会不会有什么影响?

谢谢~
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

BayesInter

专家顾问 (正式写手)


引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by felicity6056 at 2025-09-13 19:47:59
这个问题不好解决。

请说出你的观点,你可以详尽地说,谢谢!
发自小木虫手机客户端
15楼2025-09-13 21:35:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 23 个回答

stoult

木虫 (职业作家)



BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
3楼2025-09-13 18:21:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
这个问题不好解决。
9楼2025-09-13 19:47:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
tzynew2楼
2025-09-13 18:16   回复  
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
o 发自小木虫手机客户端
zusn6楼
2025-09-13 18:48   回复  
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫手机客户端
2025-09-13 20:57   回复  
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫IOS客户端
2025-09-13 19:18   回复  
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫手机客户端
holypower4楼
2025-09-13 18:25   回复  
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫IOS客户端
2025-09-13 19:54   回复  
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫IOS客户端
ygxzxd14楼
2025-09-13 21:27   回复  
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
?? 发自小木虫IOS客户端
2025-09-13 21:05   回复  
BayesInter(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫手机客户端
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 研究生招生 +3 徐海涛11 2026-03-10 7/350 2026-03-12 14:26 by 徐海涛11
[考研] 085600 材料与化工 295 求调剂 +10 dream…… 2026-03-10 12/600 2026-03-12 13:46 by dream……
[考研] 0703化学一志愿211 总分320求调剂 +3 玛卡巴卡啊哈 2026-03-11 3/150 2026-03-11 22:25 by peike
[考研] 工科0856专硕化学工程269能调剂吗 +9 我想读研11 2026-03-10 9/450 2026-03-11 16:42 by 看开一点
[考研] 083000环境科学与工程调剂 +8 mingmingry 2026-03-09 9/450 2026-03-11 10:23 by 沙漠之狐994
[考研] 293求调剂,一志愿陕师大生物学 +3 ??????.?.??? 2026-03-09 3/150 2026-03-11 10:02 by 学员8dgXkO
[基金申请] 提交后的基金本子,已让学校撤回了,可否换口子提交 +3 dut_pfx 2026-03-10 3/150 2026-03-11 08:38 by kudofaye
[考研] 306求调剂 +3 唐薏薏 2026-03-09 3/150 2026-03-10 22:30 by peike
[考研] 308求调剂 +4 是Lupa啊 2026-03-08 7/350 2026-03-10 18:25 by 清风月
[考研] 327分求调剂086 +4 西红柿?小帅 2026-03-09 7/350 2026-03-10 14:47 by ruiyingmiao
[考研] 一志愿:武汉理工,材料工程,英二数二 总分314 +3 2202020125 2026-03-10 4/200 2026-03-10 13:54 by xiongyaxuan
[考研] 0703化学调剂 +7 小奶苍 2026-03-07 7/350 2026-03-10 05:17 by anny19840123
[考研] 320求调剂 +4 魏zy 2026-03-08 4/200 2026-03-09 16:14 by ruiyingmiao
[考研] 材料调剂 +4 xxxcm 2026-03-08 7/350 2026-03-09 10:11 by EBSD
[教师之家] 交大前校长王树国:现在最先进的科技并不在大学实验室,而是在企业研究院 +4 zju2000 2026-03-08 6/300 2026-03-08 19:15 by zju2000
[考研] 求调剂,不管什么专业,我是可塑造的人才一枚,希望遇到知己老师捞捞我 +4 13102137290 2026-03-06 5/250 2026-03-07 21:21 by lissomchan
[考研] 一志愿中国石油大学(华东) 本科齐鲁工业大学 求调剂 +3 snw石 2026-03-07 3/150 2026-03-07 20:01 by houyaoxu
[考研] 诚求调剂,323分 有专利/科研/实习经历 +6 橙子cyx 2026-03-06 8/400 2026-03-07 19:06 by 新篇章DFSS
[考研] 287求调剂 +3 看看我. 2026-03-05 6/300 2026-03-06 10:40 by Iveryant
[考研] 316求调剂 +3 林小星发大财 2026-03-05 5/250 2026-03-06 09:05 by Iveryant
信息提示
请填处理意见