24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 469  |  回复: 6
当前主题已经存档。

eveb

木虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 大家帮忙看一下二审意见.几个疑问请高手指点,谢谢

文章经过初审让大修.大修后经二审,意见如下
Reviewer #1: The paper has been clearly improved. However, the effects of bFGF gene silencing on glioma cell proliferation remain rather low.
Minor point: the authors should label the x-axis of the diagram in Fig. 4.

Reviewer #2: The authors have responded to most of the reviewers comments, but serious reservations remain.
The biggest issue is that the effects observed are fairly modest, and do not provide convincing evidence that this approach will lead anywhere in glioma therapy.
This could potentially be rescued by survival studies, or combinations with chemotherapeutics as suggested in the previous round of comments. The use of glioma stem-like cells may also help, as these may be more responsive to this approach.

MINOR POINTS
1. the cell line should be referred to as LN229 rather than L229.
2. Exposure for the scratch assay shown in figure 2 is very uneven.

现有个疑问.请高指点一下评阅人的这几句话用回答吗

Reviewer #1: The paper has been clearly improved. However, the effects of bFGF gene silencing on glioma cell proliferation remain rather low.

Reviewer #2: The authors have responded to most of the reviewers comments, but serious reservations remain.
The biggest issue is that the effects observed are fairly modest, and do not provide convincing evidence that this approach will lead anywhere in glioma therapy.

This could potentially be rescued by survival studies, or combinations with chemotherapeutics as suggested in the previous round of comments. The use of glioma stem-like cells may also help, as these may be more responsive to this approach.

还是只回答下面的几点就可以
Minor point: the authors should label the x-axis of the diagram in Fig. 4.
MINOR POINTS
1. the cell line should be referred to as LN229 rather than L229.
2. Exposure for the scratch assay shown in figure 2 is very uneven.

高手指点.谢谢
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

今天来灌水

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)


eveb(金币+1,VIP+0):2 10-27 15:20
前面两点也要做出说明或解释!
2楼2009-10-27 12:07:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

weiswallow

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)


eveb(金币+1,VIP+0): 10-27 15:20
不管是什么,只要是审稿意见,都必须要认真回答与解释
学无止境
3楼2009-10-27 13:54:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liwenbin0929

新虫 (正式写手)


eveb(金币+1,VIP+0): 10-27 15:21
楼上两位说的很对,对审稿人提出的异议必须做回复,要修改的地方也肯定是要改的。态度决定一切
4楼2009-10-27 13:59:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

realmadrider

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)


eveb(金币+1,VIP+0): 10-27 15:21
引用回帖:
还是只回答下面的几点就可以
Minor point: the authors should label the x-axis of the diagram in Fig. 4.
MINOR POINTS
1. the cell line should be referred to as LN229 rather than L229.
2. Exposure for the scratch assay shown in figure 2 is very uneven.

这些都是MINOR的问题,前面的才是MAJOR的问题,好好回答审稿人的问题
5楼2009-10-27 14:22:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

awenxm

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)


eveb(金币+1,VIP+0): 10-27 15:21
对的, 都要回答或解释

对与前面的,需要解释一下,
对于minor points则需要修改
6楼2009-10-27 14:24:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ljl8209

木虫 (知名作家)



eveb(金币+1,VIP+0): 10-27 21:21
都要认真回答的  前面的更重要一些, 后面的应该容易搞定
7楼2009-10-27 17:09:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 eveb 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见