| 查看: 691 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
xinren08铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
|
[交流]
请帮忙看一下审稿意见，谢谢！
|
||
|
审稿意见如下： Author has suggested and analyzed an iterative method for co-coercive strucured variational inequalities. Using the standard technique, author considered the convergence analysis, which is a routine excercise. No creativity is involved. （1） Numerical results are not encouraging. From the tables, it is clear the proposed method is not efficient. （2）Refrences are not update, which is a serious drawback. Author must include the recent references to make it useful. （3）There is no introduction to the variational inequalities and related problems. Author must this fact into consideration. In short, a major revision is needed. 总体感觉这个审稿意见比较笼统。问大家两个问题： 1. 第2条是说参考文献太旧了吗？其中“Author must include the recent references to make it useful. ”是什么意思？ 2. 第3条的“Author must this fact into consideration. ”是什么意思？ 谢谢！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
申博发邮件
已经有8人回复
-
各位大神，目前国内有哪些比较好用的逆合成软件？
已经有9人回复
-
国社科系统bug了，是不是要放榜了？
已经有7人回复
-
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组｜2027级博士研究生招生公告
已经有8人回复
-
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组招收博士研究生
已经有8人回复
小蚂蚁1980
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5104.6
- 散金: 2001
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 1611
- 在线: 176.8小时
- 虫号: 158156
- 注册: 2006-01-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 理论和计算化学
6楼2009-09-25 12:21:58
2楼2009-09-25 10:57:38
3楼2009-09-25 11:03:07
4楼2009-09-25 11:05:57