| 查看: 460 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
xinren08铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
|
[交流]
请帮忙看一下审稿意见，谢谢！
|
||
|
审稿意见如下： Author has suggested and analyzed an iterative method for co-coercive strucured variational inequalities. Using the standard technique, author considered the convergence analysis, which is a routine excercise. No creativity is involved. （1） Numerical results are not encouraging. From the tables, it is clear the proposed method is not efficient. （2）Refrences are not update, which is a serious drawback. Author must include the recent references to make it useful. （3）There is no introduction to the variational inequalities and related problems. Author must this fact into consideration. In short, a major revision is needed. 总体感觉这个审稿意见比较笼统。问大家两个问题： 1. 第2条是说参考文献太旧了吗？其中“Author must include the recent references to make it useful. ”是什么意思？ 2. 第3条的“Author must this fact into consideration. ”是什么意思？ 谢谢！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
复试调剂
已经有23人回复
-
求调剂学校
已经有15人回复
-
085801电气专硕272求调剂
已经有19人回复
-
材料工程281还有调剂机会吗
已经有44人回复
-
一志愿华中农业071010，320求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
289 分105500药学专硕求调剂(找B区学校)
已经有3人回复
-
山东省基金2026
已经有12人回复
-
药学求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
一志愿沪9，生物学326求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
307中医考研调剂
已经有3人回复
小蚂蚁1980
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5099.6
- 散金: 2001
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 1610
- 在线: 176.7小时
- 虫号: 158156
- 注册: 2006-01-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 理论和计算化学
6楼2009-09-25 12:21:58
2楼2009-09-25 10:57:38
3楼2009-09-25 11:03:07
4楼2009-09-25 11:05:57
