| 查看: 630 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
xinren08铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
|
[交流]
请帮忙看一下审稿意见,谢谢!
|
||
|
审稿意见如下: Author has suggested and analyzed an iterative method for co-coercive strucured variational inequalities. Using the standard technique, author considered the convergence analysis, which is a routine excercise. No creativity is involved. (1) Numerical results are not encouraging. From the tables, it is clear the proposed method is not efficient. (2)Refrences are not update, which is a serious drawback. Author must include the recent references to make it useful. (3)There is no introduction to the variational inequalities and related problems. Author must this fact into consideration. In short, a major revision is needed. 总体感觉这个审稿意见比较笼统。问大家两个问题: 1. 第2条是说参考文献太旧了吗?其中“Author must include the recent references to make it useful. ”是什么意思? 2. 第3条的“Author must this fact into consideration. ”是什么意思? 谢谢!! |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有7人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有8人回复
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有22人回复
是这周出结果还是下周出结果?
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有49人回复
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜?
已经有5人回复
各位道友,我要去昆明玩几天,回来见。
已经有7人回复
filecode
已经有10人回复
2楼2009-09-25 10:57:38
3楼2009-09-25 11:03:07
4楼2009-09-25 11:05:57
5楼2009-09-25 11:12:33
小蚂蚁1980
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5104.6
- 散金: 2001
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 1611
- 在线: 176.8小时
- 虫号: 158156
- 注册: 2006-01-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 理论和计算化学
6楼2009-09-25 12:21:58










回复此楼