| 查看: 469 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
xinren08铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
|
[交流]
请帮忙看一下审稿意见，谢谢！
|
||
|
审稿意见如下： Author has suggested and analyzed an iterative method for co-coercive strucured variational inequalities. Using the standard technique, author considered the convergence analysis, which is a routine excercise. No creativity is involved. （1） Numerical results are not encouraging. From the tables, it is clear the proposed method is not efficient. （2）Refrences are not update, which is a serious drawback. Author must include the recent references to make it useful. （3）There is no introduction to the variational inequalities and related problems. Author must this fact into consideration. In short, a major revision is needed. 总体感觉这个审稿意见比较笼统。问大家两个问题： 1. 第2条是说参考文献太旧了吗？其中“Author must include the recent references to make it useful. ”是什么意思？ 2. 第3条的“Author must this fact into consideration. ”是什么意思？ 谢谢！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
急需调剂
已经有8人回复
-
申博/考博
已经有4人回复
-
化工学硕294分，求导师收留
已经有37人回复
-
求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
260求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿华中农业071010，320求调剂
已经有19人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
求博导｜生物质基多孔碳/超级电容方向，已有相关成果，寻能源材料/碳材料方向老师
已经有3人回复
-
二苯甲酮酸类衍生物
已经有6人回复
-
接受任何调剂
已经有4人回复
2楼2009-09-25 10:57:38
3楼2009-09-25 11:03:07
4楼2009-09-25 11:05:57
5楼2009-09-25 11:12:33
小蚂蚁1980
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5099.6
- 散金: 2001
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 1610
- 在线: 176.7小时
- 虫号: 158156
- 注册: 2006-01-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 理论和计算化学
6楼2009-09-25 12:21:58
