| 查看: 444 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
xinren08铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
|
[交流]
请帮忙看一下审稿意见，谢谢！
|
||
|
审稿意见如下： Author has suggested and analyzed an iterative method for co-coercive strucured variational inequalities. Using the standard technique, author considered the convergence analysis, which is a routine excercise. No creativity is involved. （1） Numerical results are not encouraging. From the tables, it is clear the proposed method is not efficient. （2）Refrences are not update, which is a serious drawback. Author must include the recent references to make it useful. （3）There is no introduction to the variational inequalities and related problems. Author must this fact into consideration. In short, a major revision is needed. 总体感觉这个审稿意见比较笼统。问大家两个问题： 1. 第2条是说参考文献太旧了吗？其中“Author must include the recent references to make it useful. ”是什么意思？ 2. 第3条的“Author must this fact into consideration. ”是什么意思？ 谢谢！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
322求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
290求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
346分，工科0854求调剂，专硕
已经有5人回复
-
293求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
086000调剂
已经有6人回复
-
一志愿085802 323分求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
求调剂
已经有17人回复
-
电气专硕320求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
材料相关专业344求调剂双非工科学校或课题组
已经有5人回复
-
335求调剂
已经有12人回复
2楼2009-09-25 10:57:38
3楼2009-09-25 11:03:07
4楼2009-09-25 11:05:57
5楼2009-09-25 11:12:33
小蚂蚁1980
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5099.6
- 散金: 2001
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 1610
- 在线: 176.7小时
- 虫号: 158156
- 注册: 2006-01-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 理论和计算化学
6楼2009-09-25 12:21:58
