24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

flyskysky

银虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 243.6
帖子: 454
在线: 1.7小时
虫号: 216661
注册: 2006-03-11
性别: GG
专业: 应用有机化学

[交流] 求助审稿回复的list该怎么写，同时祈福能顺利接受

审稿回来了，好像reviewer觉得还行，但是对于怎么回复，因为是第一次发稿，心里面实在没有底！
”
Reviewer #2: In this manuscript, authors report synthesis and crystal structures of new ferrocenyl nitroxides, and describe relationships between their structures and antioxidation activities.  These compounds and their physicochemical properties are interesting, but, the antioxidation activities should be examined,essentially, taking account for the toxicity of these compounds.

This manuscript must be corrected and improved in many points listed below.  Authors should consider about these points, deeply, and must revise their manuscript, majorly.

In Fig. 2, figure caption shows that ellipsoids of the ORTEP views are given at a 50 % probability level.  However, the shapes and sizes of atoms are different from those of refined structures.  Please see the checkCIF file of 4, showing the real ORTEP views at a 50 % probability level.  In Fig. 2, these atoms might be described with isotropic refinement parameters.  For exactly reporting these results, authors must take care of describing data details.  In this state, the manuscript does not meet the standard report in any journal.

Text p2,line 2
electrochemistry properties ----> electrochemical properties （我已经改成了electrochemical properties）

Text p2, 2.2, 2nd paragraph, line 3
essentially geometrically ----> (should be corrected) （我已经改好了）

Text p2, 2.2, 2nd paragraph, line 6
S-trans double system ----> ? （我已经改好了）

Text p2, 2.2, 3rd paragraph, line 3
The intermolecular hydrogen bonds in 4b are not clearly shown in the sentences and Fig. 1. （已经对句子进行了改正）

Text p3, 2.2, 3rd paragraph, line 8
The tortion angles within TEMPO are not clearly shown in the sentences.  The angle values shoud be checked, again.
C-C-C-N2 ----> C14-C15-C16-N2 ?
C-N2-C-C ----> C16-N2-C17-C18 and C17-N2-C16-C15 ?
O2-N2-C-C ----> O2-N2-C17-C18 and O2-N2-C16-C15  ?“
我已经注明了

对与reviewer的comments我已经一一作出了修改。
但是编辑同时要求please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised

这个list该怎么写呢！是要列出编辑的建议，一个一个回答，
象
Answer to referee 1 comments:
1.
2.
但这样未免太繁复了。

还是直接标明在第几页几行作出了修改呢，这样倒是简单些，但不知道符合不符合要求！

心里面很着急啊，请虫友们给我一个建议，最好能给我一些句例，不胜感谢！

回复此楼