| 查看: 596 | 回复: 11 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
flyskysky银虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
求助审稿回复的list该怎么写，同时祈福能顺利接受
|
||
|
审稿回来了，好像reviewer觉得还行，但是对于怎么回复，因为是第一次发稿，心里面实在没有底！ ” Reviewer #2: In this manuscript, authors report synthesis and crystal structures of new ferrocenyl nitroxides, and describe relationships between their structures and antioxidation activities. These compounds and their physicochemical properties are interesting, but, the antioxidation activities should be examined,essentially, taking account for the toxicity of these compounds. This manuscript must be corrected and improved in many points listed below. Authors should consider about these points, deeply, and must revise their manuscript, majorly. In Fig. 2, figure caption shows that ellipsoids of the ORTEP views are given at a 50 % probability level. However, the shapes and sizes of atoms are different from those of refined structures. Please see the checkCIF file of 4, showing the real ORTEP views at a 50 % probability level. In Fig. 2, these atoms might be described with isotropic refinement parameters. For exactly reporting these results, authors must take care of describing data details. In this state, the manuscript does not meet the standard report in any journal. Text p2,line 2 electrochemistry properties ----> electrochemical properties （我已经改成了electrochemical properties） Text p2, 2.2, 2nd paragraph, line 3 essentially geometrically ----> (should be corrected) （我已经改好了） Text p2, 2.2, 2nd paragraph, line 6 S-trans double system ----> ? （我已经改好了） Text p2, 2.2, 3rd paragraph, line 3 The intermolecular hydrogen bonds in 4b are not clearly shown in the sentences and Fig. 1. （已经对句子进行了改正） Text p3, 2.2, 3rd paragraph, line 8 The tortion angles within TEMPO are not clearly shown in the sentences. The angle values shoud be checked, again. C-C-C-N2 ----> C14-C15-C16-N2 ? C-N2-C-C ----> C16-N2-C17-C18 and C17-N2-C16-C15 ? O2-N2-C-C ----> O2-N2-C17-C18 and O2-N2-C16-C15 ?“ 我已经注明了 对与reviewer的comments我已经一一作出了修改。 但是编辑同时要求please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised 这个list该怎么写呢！是要列出编辑的建议，一个一个回答， 象 Answer to referee 1 comments: 1. 2. 但这样未免太繁复了。 还是直接标明在第几页几行作出了修改呢，这样倒是简单些，但不知道符合不符合要求！ 心里面很着急啊，请虫友们给我一个建议，最好能给我一些句例，不胜感谢！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
303求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
311求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
307求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
课题组接收材料类调剂研究生
已经有4人回复
-
295复试调剂
已经有3人回复
-
一志愿中南大学理学化学
已经有4人回复
-
298求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
291分工科求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
284求调剂
已经有6人回复
cxksama
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
玉树临风小纯洁
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 30 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 8.522
- 金币: 35361.3
- 散金: 8440
- 红花: 100
- 沙发: 10
- 帖子: 10344
- 在线: 1656.3小时
- 虫号: 536545
- 注册: 2008-03-31
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机材料化学
- 管辖: 论文投稿
★
flyskysky(金币+1,VIP+0):thank you! 8-3 19:15
flyskysky(金币+1,VIP+0):thank you! 8-3 19:15
|
点对点逐条回复，越详细越好，包括你文章中改了语言的地方同样点对点指出。 我这里写过我用过的response：http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1288302 其实列举的方法和你差不多。 [ Last edited by lby1258 on 2009-8-1 at 14:17 ] |
9楼2009-08-01 14:03:12
努力着
荣誉版主 (职业作家)
低调隐士
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 2.114
- 金币: 10831.9
- 散金: 1152
- 红花: 22
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 4586
- 在线: 369.1小时
- 虫号: 161721
- 注册: 2006-01-09
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 信息安全
- 管辖: 学术会议交流
好好改，一定没问题的，Bless!等着你的好消息 3楼2009-08-01 00:06:07
zhangyoufa
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
小发哥
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 15018.1
- 散金: 2517
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 9202
- 在线: 678.5小时
- 虫号: 296782
- 注册: 2006-11-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 半导体材料
4楼2009-08-01 00:17:04
sirljz
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
Well spend every day！
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.282
- 金币: 6260.8
- 散金: 42
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 1216
- 在线: 36.2小时
- 虫号: 614600
- 注册: 2008-09-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属结构材料
5楼2009-08-01 00:26:16
