| ²é¿´: 1558 | »Ø¸´: 7 | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
whjwdÖ÷¹ÜÇø³¤
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÊýѧÂÛÎÄ£¬Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûû¿´¶®£¬ÇóÖú ÒÑÓÐ2È˲ÎÓë
|
|
|
ͶÁËһƪÂÛÎÄ£¬Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÓÐÕâÑùÒ»¶Î£º the denominator in (2.7) decreases, bu the author fails to show that this expression does not vanish in the interval (0£¬1). without this the assertion in line 37 is not valid. ÂÛÎÄÖеÄÏà¹ØÄÚÈÝÈçÏ£º £¨2.7£© it is not difficult to verify that the function on (0,1). hence (2.7) implies that the quotient accordingly, from lemma 2.1 and (2.6), it is deduced that the ratio increasing in (0; 1). û¶Á¶®ÉÏÃæµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬ÇóÖú´ó¼Ò£¬Éó¸åÈËÊÇʲôÒâ˼£¿ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
270Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
085601²ÄÁϹ¤³ÌÕÒµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
266·Ö£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸µçÆø¹¤³Ì£¬±¾¿Æ²ÄÁÏ£¬Çó²ÄÁÏרҵµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
286Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
266·ÖÇó²ÄÁÏ»¯¹¤Ò±½ð¿óÒµµÈרҵµÄµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼ÁÍÆ¼ö ²ÄÁÏ 304
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
805600ר˶²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤348·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
295²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
гÇ×ÓÔø
¶Ò»»¹ó±ö
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- Ó¦Öú: 40 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 15548.2
- É¢½ð: 4471
- ºì»¨: 14
- Ìû×Ó: 9692
- ÔÚÏß: 885.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 4034253
- ×¢²á: 2015-08-23
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Êýѧ
7Â¥2020-11-22 09:47:45
ruileelucky
ר¼Ò¹ËÎÊ
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 35993.4
- É¢½ð: 265
- ºì»¨: 33
- Ìû×Ó: 15073
- ÔÚÏß: 248Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2308559
- ×¢²á: 2013-03-01
- רҵ: ÐÄÀíÓïÑÔѧ
2Â¥2020-11-21 22:36:06
Guanghao
ר¼Ò¹ËÎÊ
3Â¥2020-11-21 22:40:35
ballhall
¶Ò»»¹ó±ö
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- Ó¦Öú: 15 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 4807.9
- É¢½ð: 44
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 113
- ÔÚÏß: 75.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 14199163
- ×¢²á: 2019-02-18
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ³£Î¢·Ö·½³ÌÓ붯Á¦ÏµÍ³
4Â¥2020-11-22 07:08:17














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
²»Ì«¶®£¬£¨2.7£©ÔÚÇø¼ä£¨0,1£©µÄÈ·ÊǼõСÁË£¬ÊÇÐèÒªÖ¤Ã÷·ÖĸÇ÷ÏòÓÚÎÞÇ²»¶®