| ²é¿´: 1555 | »Ø¸´: 7 | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
whjwd¹ÜÀíÔ±
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÊýѧÂÛÎÄ£¬Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûû¿´¶®£¬ÇóÖú ÒÑÓÐ2È˲ÎÓë
|
|
|
ͶÁËһƪÂÛÎÄ£¬Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÓÐÕâÑùÒ»¶Î£º the denominator in (2.7) decreases, bu the author fails to show that this expression does not vanish in the interval (0£¬1). without this the assertion in line 37 is not valid. ÂÛÎÄÖеÄÏà¹ØÄÚÈÝÈçÏ£º £¨2.7£© it is not difficult to verify that the function on (0,1). hence (2.7) implies that the quotient accordingly, from lemma 2.1 and (2.6), it is deduced that the ratio increasing in (0; 1). û¶Á¶®ÉÏÃæµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬ÇóÖú´ó¼Ò£¬Éó¸åÈËÊÇʲôÒâ˼£¿ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
286Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
290Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
085600£¬320·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
292·Ö£¬²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤£¬ÉêÇëµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
0710ÉúÎïѧÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©¿Æ¼¼£¬085601×Ü·Ö305Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Î÷°²½»´ó²ÄÁÏѧ˶£¨Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þ£©347£¬Çóµ÷¼Áµ½¸ß·Ö×Ó/²ÄÁÏÏà¹Ø×¨Òµ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶322·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
070300»¯Ñ§Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
Guanghao
³¬¼¶°æÖ÷
3Â¥2020-11-21 22:40:35
ruileelucky
Ö÷¹ÜÇø³¤
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 35993.4
- É¢½ð: 265
- ºì»¨: 33
- Ìû×Ó: 15073
- ÔÚÏß: 248Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2308559
- ×¢²á: 2013-03-01
- רҵ: ÐÄÀíÓïÑÔѧ
2Â¥2020-11-21 22:36:06
ballhall
Ö÷¹ÜÇø³¤
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- Ó¦Öú: 15 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 4807.9
- É¢½ð: 44
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 113
- ÔÚÏß: 75.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 14199163
- ×¢²á: 2019-02-18
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ³£Î¢·Ö·½³ÌÓ붯Á¦ÏµÍ³
4Â¥2020-11-22 07:08:17
гÇ×ÓÔø
³¬¼¶°æÖ÷
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- Ó¦Öú: 40 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 15548.2
- É¢½ð: 4471
- ºì»¨: 14
- Ìû×Ó: 9692
- ÔÚÏß: 885.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 4034253
- ×¢²á: 2015-08-23
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Êýѧ
5Â¥2020-11-22 09:19:38














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
²»Ì«¶®£¬£¨2.7£©ÔÚÇø¼ä£¨0,1£©µÄÈ·ÊǼõСÁË£¬ÊÇÐèÒªÖ¤Ã÷·ÖĸÇ÷ÏòÓÚÎÞÇ²»¶®