24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1037  |  回复: 4
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者fromto1566将赠送您 4 个金币

fromto1566

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 这种审稿意见还有希望吗?大家帮忙看看已有1人参与

三个审稿人,两个还可以,其中一个问题比较尖锐,大家出出主意吧。

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
Review of “Novel Dual Redundancy EHA Research and Controller Design”

The paper introduces the electro-hydrostatic actuators (EHA) system with a dual redundancy motor pump. A control method is proposed and applied to the system. In addition, a simulation model is built in the commercial Amesim software to simulate several working conditions.
As an overall comment, the paper topic is suitable for the journal, and the control part it is relatively complete. The block diagrams of the motor pump control and the hydraulic cylinder control are given. Based on those block diagrams, a block diagram of the whole system is presented, and the control method is applied on the diagrams. With the simulation model, the function of the control method can be analyzed and compared.
The paper, however, should be rejected or a substantial revision should be provided before it can get published. This reviewer believes that the weaknesses are described by the following points:
1.        The valve is a significant component in the system, but it is not considered in the block diagrams. The response specifications of the valve may have impact on the whole system. Why this component was neglected?
2.        The accumulator is simplified as an anti-cavitation component. What does it mean? More analysis should be performed on this project. The accumulator can not only store energy, but it can also compensate the differential flow rate from asymmetric actuators. This is not clear at all in the paper.
3.        What are the advantages of the dual redundancy motor-pump? These are not clear at all in the paper. Why this layout of EHA was choses with respect to the state of the art which has a single motor-pump? Perhaps the authors should take a standard EHA as baseline of comparison.
4.        No element is present to divide the flow in the considered circuit, so the motion of the actuators is totally constraint by the speed range of the motor(pump)! The system most likely cannot work in practice at low speed, with the schematic represented.
5.        The performance of the system shown in the paper is only the control response, but not the efficiency or the energy flow. For EHAs, efficiency is what most people care about. An energy analysis of the proposed solution should be addressed, or at least a proper reference should be given.

Some other details on the typesetting or expression:
1.        Equation (15), (16) and (17) seem a bit messy for the typesetting.
2.        The working mode in the figure 9 and figure 10 should be clearly defined.
3.        Equation (19), (22), (24) and more have some problems. (maybe the format problem)
4.        Spelling such as electrohydrostatic -> electro-hydrostatic, anticavitation -> anti-cavitation.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sha5241sha

新虫 (著名写手)


fromto1566(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 祝好运 2019-04-05 20:47:39
只要编辑没有给拒稿就有希望

发自小木虫IOS客户端
2楼2019-04-05 10:05:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mlxmiao

木虫 (著名写手)

3楼2019-04-05 13:07:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bobvan

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
只要你能说服这个审稿人,希望是很大的
4楼2019-04-05 14:11:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lupan1981

新虫 (初入文坛)

编辑什么意见?能不能发出来看看?

发自小木虫Android客户端
5楼2019-04-23 11:16:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 fromto1566 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[硕博家园] 硕博巨婴,也许才刚刚开始 +30 SNaiL1995 2024-06-12 65/3250 2024-06-16 02:10 by 青古
[基金申请] 博后面上今天有bug可以看到是否资助? +20 lyfbangong 2024-06-12 31/1550 2024-06-15 21:18 by since—2010
[考博] 上海交大招收材料化学方向科研助理/“申请考核”博士(请勿回复帖子或站内投条) +3 灵梦and紫 2024-06-12 4/200 2024-06-15 20:58 by 1822836277
[论文投稿] 审稿人含糊拒稿,还需要回复吗?如何回复? 20+3 BruceChum 2024-06-15 17/850 2024-06-15 20:19 by arthas_007
[教师之家] 请问事业编制和年薪制冲突吗? +6 ZHONGWU_U 2024-06-14 6/300 2024-06-15 20:16 by Ermito
[基金申请] 博后基金,博管会会提前知道消息吗? +3 yuyiang 2024-06-13 3/150 2024-06-15 19:52 by Lynn212
[教师之家] 我们学院常年位居 各学院 倒数第二。专业撤销的话,在编者有什么补偿? +13 河西夜郎 2024-06-09 14/700 2024-06-15 19:44 by LittleBush
[基金申请] 为什么我的博后基金还在流动站审核中?不会是学院给我卡了吧? +14 王凯12 2024-06-13 26/1300 2024-06-15 15:22 by 好人与坏人
[论文投稿] 求机械类四区sci推荐 5+3 迷茫小旷 2024-06-14 4/200 2024-06-15 11:25 by bobvan
[基金申请] 有没有机械的前辈分享一下评上海优都是什么成果啊 +7 wulala800 2024-06-10 7/350 2024-06-15 09:33 by 晓目崇
[基金申请] 博后基金,以往的结果点不开,怎么回事呢?最后一次机会了,两次都没中前面。 +7 kyukitu 2024-06-14 13/650 2024-06-15 06:46 by 我是王小帅
[食品] 食品博士导师 +6 小李醒yy 2024-06-11 9/450 2024-06-14 23:37 by 小李醒yy
[论文投稿] 审稿问题:为什么荧光激发波长和紫外吸收波长差的大? 10+4 sdawege 2024-06-14 8/400 2024-06-14 22:39 by 东北读书人
[考研] 物理化学一对一辅导 +3 林大diao 2024-06-12 5/250 2024-06-14 20:57 by 林大diao
[找工作] 应届大龄土博教职选择,石河子大学和广西大学 10+4 茅山老道士 2024-06-10 31/1550 2024-06-14 10:40 by ChmistryCHEN
[考博] 还能读上博士吗 +14 小伙走起 2024-06-09 24/1200 2024-06-14 06:32 by 18787065176
[基金申请] 连续两年医学口青年项目初审体会 +11 进击的荣耀 2024-06-09 18/900 2024-06-13 17:27 by 进击的荣耀
[有机交流] 原料反应完了,怎么知道是产物还是中间体 +6 小胡在努力 2024-06-11 8/400 2024-06-13 13:33 by 091602
[基金申请] 博后特助这周出结果吗?往年都是啥时候啊? +13 jsqy 2024-06-12 17/850 2024-06-12 19:55 by Lynn212
[教师之家] 公办双非,学生论文升学就业都不行。一本大学的论文升学就业没问题吧? +5 河西夜郎 2024-06-09 5/250 2024-06-10 17:59 by yyallen2003
信息提示
请填处理意见