24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1036  |  回复: 4
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者fromto1566将赠送您 4 个金币

fromto1566

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 这种审稿意见还有希望吗?大家帮忙看看已有1人参与

三个审稿人,两个还可以,其中一个问题比较尖锐,大家出出主意吧。

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
Review of “Novel Dual Redundancy EHA Research and Controller Design”

The paper introduces the electro-hydrostatic actuators (EHA) system with a dual redundancy motor pump. A control method is proposed and applied to the system. In addition, a simulation model is built in the commercial Amesim software to simulate several working conditions.
As an overall comment, the paper topic is suitable for the journal, and the control part it is relatively complete. The block diagrams of the motor pump control and the hydraulic cylinder control are given. Based on those block diagrams, a block diagram of the whole system is presented, and the control method is applied on the diagrams. With the simulation model, the function of the control method can be analyzed and compared.
The paper, however, should be rejected or a substantial revision should be provided before it can get published. This reviewer believes that the weaknesses are described by the following points:
1.        The valve is a significant component in the system, but it is not considered in the block diagrams. The response specifications of the valve may have impact on the whole system. Why this component was neglected?
2.        The accumulator is simplified as an anti-cavitation component. What does it mean? More analysis should be performed on this project. The accumulator can not only store energy, but it can also compensate the differential flow rate from asymmetric actuators. This is not clear at all in the paper.
3.        What are the advantages of the dual redundancy motor-pump? These are not clear at all in the paper. Why this layout of EHA was choses with respect to the state of the art which has a single motor-pump? Perhaps the authors should take a standard EHA as baseline of comparison.
4.        No element is present to divide the flow in the considered circuit, so the motion of the actuators is totally constraint by the speed range of the motor(pump)! The system most likely cannot work in practice at low speed, with the schematic represented.
5.        The performance of the system shown in the paper is only the control response, but not the efficiency or the energy flow. For EHAs, efficiency is what most people care about. An energy analysis of the proposed solution should be addressed, or at least a proper reference should be given.

Some other details on the typesetting or expression:
1.        Equation (15), (16) and (17) seem a bit messy for the typesetting.
2.        The working mode in the figure 9 and figure 10 should be clearly defined.
3.        Equation (19), (22), (24) and more have some problems. (maybe the format problem)
4.        Spelling such as electrohydrostatic -> electro-hydrostatic, anticavitation -> anti-cavitation.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sha5241sha

新虫 (著名写手)


fromto1566(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 祝好运 2019-04-05 20:47:39
只要编辑没有给拒稿就有希望

发自小木虫IOS客户端
2楼2019-04-05 10:05:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mlxmiao

木虫 (著名写手)

3楼2019-04-05 13:07:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bobvan

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
只要你能说服这个审稿人,希望是很大的
4楼2019-04-05 14:11:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lupan1981

新虫 (初入文坛)

编辑什么意见?能不能发出来看看?

发自小木虫Android客户端
5楼2019-04-23 11:16:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 fromto1566 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[硕博家园] 硕博巨婴,也许才刚刚开始 +28 SNaiL1995 2024-06-12 62/3100 2024-06-16 00:16 by 小龙虾biubiubiu
[基金申请] 面青地会评时间 +5 tanjydd 2024-06-15 5/250 2024-06-15 23:08 by andywei1028
[基金申请] Nature 11日发文,中国著名学者们称造假迫不得已 +5 babu2015 2024-06-14 5/250 2024-06-15 20:40 by lc231001
[基金申请] 博后基金,博管会会提前知道消息吗? +3 yuyiang 2024-06-13 3/150 2024-06-15 19:52 by Lynn212
[考博] 希望能25博士入学,可提前一年做科研助理 +4 干饭版小太阳 2024-06-09 8/400 2024-06-15 18:36 by 独孤老狗
[有机交流] 车间生产,真空度很高,温度很高,但减压蒸馏速度很慢。 10+12 召唤鬼泣lL 2024-06-13 35/1750 2024-06-15 16:14 by 老钱秀
[基金申请] BO4的YQ答辩通知发布了吗? +6 博学笃行 2024-06-11 6/300 2024-06-15 16:04 by 悲催科研狗
[论文投稿] 求机械类四区sci推荐 5+3 迷茫小旷 2024-06-14 4/200 2024-06-15 11:25 by bobvan
[基金申请] 有没有机械的前辈分享一下评上海优都是什么成果啊 +7 wulala800 2024-06-10 7/350 2024-06-15 09:33 by 晓目崇
[论文投稿] 投了一篇4区的SCI,审稿人一个拒稿,一个小修,编辑给了大修。 +9 安稳22123 2024-06-13 10/500 2024-06-14 23:45 by jurkat.1640
[食品] 食品博士导师 +6 小李醒yy 2024-06-11 9/450 2024-06-14 23:37 by 小李醒yy
[考研] 物理化学一对一辅导 +3 林大diao 2024-06-12 5/250 2024-06-14 20:57 by 林大diao
[基金申请] 工材E口JQ有消息了吗 +4 babyduck 2024-06-11 4/200 2024-06-14 17:23 by firepick
[硕博家园] 关于硕博连读的一些疑问? +4 Lwenter 2024-06-14 4/200 2024-06-14 14:32 by ou0551
[基金申请] 博士后面上项目状态还是专家评审吗 10+9 Thatcheremu 2024-06-13 55/2750 2024-06-13 21:23 by 乌合麒麟
[基金申请] 连续两年医学口青年项目初审体会 +11 进击的荣耀 2024-06-09 18/900 2024-06-13 17:27 by 进击的荣耀
[考博] 博导选择 +3 bing85977 2024-06-12 3/150 2024-06-13 15:34 by 我是邱尧
[基金申请] C口食品 +6 好好不过分 2024-06-09 19/950 2024-06-13 12:26 by zydemon525
[论文投稿] with editor日期变更 +3 慎独的小花卷 2024-06-12 8/400 2024-06-13 11:00 by 慎独的小花卷
[论文投稿] 摩擦磨损论文投稿 +3 jmysan 2024-06-12 3/150 2024-06-13 08:36 by 莱茵润色
信息提示
请填处理意见